Women bitching about men only pool sessions at Luton, Bedfordshire

[AnthonyParticipant 2281]

Women are now bitching about men having pools only for them.

I love this quote:

Michael Brown said: “There have been Woman-Only Gyms and Woman-Only sessions for years, the men are playing catch up.

I completely agree. Women have always had women-only tax payer events/things in the past. It’s only time we men get the same luxuries.

But, women, as usual, have a problem with it because they can’t enter it and ruin the damn thing:

Linda McDermott wrote: “Going backwards#lutonwomensrights”

Laukan Creasey added: “They should learn to tolerate other people.”

Well too f~~~ing bad! Women should just learn to “woman up” and deal with it.

It’s f~~~ing hilarious to see women only start to bitch about these things now.

I wish more places had men-only spaces for men to get together and do things. But, women, as usual, will always bitch and complain and try to enter our spaces no matter what.

Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

[The_Mad_PirateParticipant 1278]

Until some beta mangina pussy thirsty politician starts thinking this is “unfair” to women.

"We didn't start the fire. It was always burning. Since the world's been turning" "A world that vilifies men only breeds a generation of men that feel no empathy towards women" “In a woman’s mind , there is really no such thing as a ‘we’. In her eyes, earth allways revolves around her, not the other way around. So thinking that your needs , aspirations or desires are valid enough to be persued, or even that you are entitled achive such goals, is like asking your boss for a pay rise in your very first day at the job.”

[Big BossParticipant 4496]

Cancerous little assholes.

[The_Mad_PirateParticipant 1278]

That is part of the Marxist doctrine… do not let the enemy gather in forces. They start comparing notes.

And part of the moral relativism marxism is built upon “only the outgroup can do wrong , ingroup can never be inmoral or do wrong” , in this case the reason is …. dum dum dum … VAGINA !

"We didn't start the fire. It was always burning. Since the world's been turning" "A world that vilifies men only breeds a generation of men that feel no empathy towards women" “In a woman’s mind , there is really no such thing as a ‘we’. In her eyes, earth allways revolves around her, not the other way around. So thinking that your needs , aspirations or desires are valid enough to be persued, or even that you are entitled achive such goals, is like asking your boss for a pay rise in your very first day at the job.”

[Anonymous 3]

One set of laws for them, one set of laws for us.

I respect anarchists and terrorists more than I do politicians and their apologists. Snowden is a great man, and the US public is clearly unworthy of men like him. It is also unworthy of the great Founding Fathers like Washington, Franklin and Jefferson, who all absolutely would not tolerate today’s government.

They were called terrorists in their time and the UK was busy trying to get everyone to attack those great men. But it was a different time, and the men of those times were smarter and stronger than the men of today.

I doubt it will happen, but one day, one day the world’s general public will find their collective testicles and start attacking the banksters, oligarchs and politician scum, the way they used to through the ages, the way they last did after the original Great Depression, when the banksters would jump out of buildings and kill themselves rather than face the music for their greed, because the ones that didn’t kill themselves were shamed and jailed. Today the bankers just laugh.

[Anonymous 3]

There’s a wrinkle to this that nobody here is mentioning.

This is actually a local authority in England giving in to demands from the local Moslem community. Bear that in mind.

If a group of white men asked for men-only sessions, I think we all know what the likely outcome of that would be.

Men-only facilities are allowed when it involves pandering to the sensitivities of minority groups.

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

After all the women only train carts, women only gyms, women only safe spaces, and they have the nerve to call this backwards?
Women having exclusive things = Progress
Men having exclusive things = A step backwards

F~~~ING WHAT?

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[ConstantineParticipant 4417]

I once had a dream about WWII. In it, the English had created electronic mannequins that wandered around the streets, in order to deceive the Germans when they flew over to drop bombs (which may not have been a bad idea actually, you wouldn’t have been able to tell the difference from that height and with goggles on).

I was telling my dad about it, and he said that – apart from the fact that technology wasn’t advanced enough to create electronic mannequins at that time – the plan would never have worked because almost every country was littered with spies. German spies residing in England would simply have relayed this ploy back to their homecountry, thus foiling the scheme.

These f~~~ing women are proving to be no better than German spies! Watching everything that men do, taking notes, relaying them back to their people, and then attacking with angry SJW rants! They want to monitor and deny everything that men do. Bitches should remember this the next time they claim that the Halocaust would never have happened with women running the country! It would’ve happened, it just wouldn’t have been Jews that were terrorised!

To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

[Anonymous 25]

For ‘cultural reasons’. So, basically it shows that to get what you want you just need a big enough group to shout loud enough. This is what women have been doing for years.

Women get so angry when they are ignored and removed from men’s lives. As mgtow grows, this is their future.

Doubt women could ever change enough to make men want to be around them. That certainly hasn’t happened in Japan.

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Anonymous wrote:

There’s a wrinkle to this that nobody here is mentioning.

This is actually a local authority in England giving in to demands from the local Moslem community. Bear that in mind.

If a group of white men asked for men-only sessions, I think we all know what the likely outcome of that would be.

Men-only facilities are allowed when it involves pandering to the sensitivities of minority groups.

this

some poor American tourist got stabbed to death in London last night and our liberal media (bbc leading the way as always) are saying the bloke had “mental health issues”….that is the new media cover term for muslim killers

[AttonParticipant]

Islam is a bitch pommie wimins.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[narwhalParticipant]

Agreed, this is more about catering to Islam/Sharia law then it is about catering to all men in a woman free time. Notice the ‘navel to knee’ rule. An actual swimmer in a speedo would not be allowed. And although it’s not written, do you think a white man with a cross tattoo on his chest wouldn’t be told he needs to leave? What’s with giving women a smaller space for a higher cost? Give them equality.

If the local mosque wanted to rent out the space, and put their own restrictions on it…no problem. A local men’s group, or women’s group, can do the same. In the US anyway, public spaces can be rented out as such. They are going about this all wrong, IMO.

This isn’t about equality, this is about slowly introducing in Sharia Law.

Ok. Then do it.

[RennieParticipant]

What a bunch of shameless hypocrites. That’s one thing I really despise about them. They are incapable of recognizing when they are being hypocritical about something.

“Why has one section of the community in Luton been allowed to dominate and take over the best pool in the borough?

Because you let them into your country, and they’re stronger and more aggressive than the local species. Should’ve thought about that before hand, eh?

Ignoring women is more powerful than many know.

I figured that out probably 10 years ago myself. Dealing with them in silence, was more effective than anything else. Trying to deal with the problem, just seem to encourage them to keep doing it, because they lack the sense to know when to p~~~ off.

Linda McDermott wrote: “Going backwards#lutonwomensrights”

Of course how dare men get the same rights…

Laukan Creasey added: “They should learn to tolerate other people.”

Look who’s talking…The same kind of idiot who created the women’s only places where men aren’t allowed and then you have the nerve to preach tolerance? Buzz off.

[shovelheadriderParticipant 2400]

they do not want hang with a bunch of catty ,bitching women.guys take them to buy lunch at pricey places. There is no hope of help from the gals getting something for nothing and dykes are too much drama.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

It’s pandering to muslims, not to all men.
But, still, it’s a breach of a taboo and an inversion of a tendency.
Yeah, it’s an attack against western values and western culture, and it’s in some ways a worrying thing.
BUT
Feminism is, sadly, a part of western culture, too…think about it for a moment…

Now they’ll have to deal with a resurgence of men-only spaces 😀 and their rhetoric cannot help them 😀 because those men are “oppressed” 😀 Smart western guys can use it at their advantage, it’s just a matter of time: NO WAY THAT THE LAW COULD ALLOW MEN-ONLY SPACES FOR MUSLIMS BUT BANNING MEN-ONLY SPACES FOR ALL MEN IN GENERAL 😀
I already said that a minority (but influential) of muslims can have even good outcomes for ALL men.
It seems I was right.

My formation is feminist: I have read A LOT of feminist literature, I had a gender studies course, with some radfem professors.
Those books, if critically analyzed, speaks to us about the nature of our enemy and about their weaknesses and their tactics.
They’re very flexible: apparently, feminism is all about “bodily autonomy” for women.
Except when it comes to surrogacy: since men would benefit of surrogated motherhood, then feminists (radical feminists and lesbian feminists: they’re the true feminists, the others are just their useful idiots and have no power – it’s radfems who dominates academia) oppose bodily autonomy for women, on the grounds of “dignity”…because they know that there aren’t real principles, and that’s a war.
Same for gender roles: they claim to be against gender roles but feminism is all about attacking western men by using our gender role against ourselves: they play the damsels in distress while asking for female supremacy disguised as special protection for weaker beings (aka women) – that’s how, in example, domestic violence laws and women-only spaces works.

That’s their nature.

Most western men will never be able to deal with such approach. Unless they don’t get some attitudes from other cultures…I’m not saying that we should convert to islam or something: I dislike religion, and I especially dislike islam. I’m saying that we should use, by cherry-picking it, just only the parts that suits us.

Like in this exchange of comments at the bottom of the article:

dave mcrobbie
But no outrage about countrywide women only swimming sessions

jbird65
@dave mcrobbie Probably because they aren’t done for cultural reasons and only because some women feel more comfortable if they know they aren’t being ogled.

Alphawave
It’s because us men don’t feel safe if there are women there as well

See?
The feminist tried to play the victim, saying that women-only spaces are meant for the protection of damsels in distress.
The guys, and those are clearly NOT islamic guys, are using it for protecting an idea: that as long as there are women-only spaces, then even men-only spaces should exist.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts