Women are not evil…

Topic by Bl4ckSh33p

Bl4ckSh33p

Home Forums MGTOW Central Women are not evil…

This topic contains 40 replies, has 22 voices, and was last updated by Varun  Varun 3 years, 10 months ago.

Viewing 41 post (of 41 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #217933
    +4
    Varun
    Varun
    Participant
    2981

    All creatures have a nature, and that nature always tells them to act in their own interests. The difference is men are told to curb that nature and act to a higher order, whereas women are excused for it and told to just act it out.

    Do you know what happens when a man just acts to his nature and refuses to have any higher order thinking? He becomes a criminal. He takes what he wants, destroys who he wants. The exact same way females act.

    Females perform their acts with manipulation, whereas men perform their acts with action. That female manipulation still requires action, either from other men or through society in general. The male victims are still destroyed with physical actions, from jail time or physical force done by the State.

    So why is that nature not evil, but you would have no issue claiming a man who steals and kills is evil?

    That is right. Criminal acts are nature (bar the psychopathic ones). Animals kill each other for dominance; the young brash lion kills the former old and weak leader and takes over the pride. Is that morally wrong? We don’t feel so. Because lions do not have higher order thinking to give rise to ‘morality for their actions’.

    Rape is more of an act of dominance. I’ve seen animals ‘commit rape’. Do they get prosecuted for their actions? Of course not. That would be absurd.

    A few days ago, a big white duck came into our lawn and started ‘raping’ our female duck. I immediatey got infuriated and threw stones at him (near him, actually) until he left. So was it just for me to feel the need to ‘punish’ that duck for his actions? No! It was his nature to seek out a female. If anything, hurting that duck would have created a row between us and the neighbour who owned that male duck. So I never even aimed for his body.

    If man’s natural instincts should be curbed for the betterment of the society, I don’t see why women’s natural instincts that are detrimenta to the society shoud not be curbed. But of course, they would confuse that with patriarchy and ‘steaing their freedom’.

    A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

Viewing 41 post (of 41 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.