Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Women are not evil…
This topic contains 40 replies, has 22 voices, and was last updated by Varun 3 years, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
All creatures have a nature, and that nature always tells them to act in their own interests. The difference is men are told to curb that nature and act to a higher order, whereas women are excused for it and told to just act it out.
Do you know what happens when a man just acts to his nature and refuses to have any higher order thinking? He becomes a criminal. He takes what he wants, destroys who he wants. The exact same way females act.
Females perform their acts with manipulation, whereas men perform their acts with action. That female manipulation still requires action, either from other men or through society in general. The male victims are still destroyed with physical actions, from jail time or physical force done by the State.
So why is that nature not evil, but you would have no issue claiming a man who steals and kills is evil?
That is right. Criminal acts are nature (bar the psychopathic ones). Animals kill each other for dominance; the young brash lion kills the former old and weak leader and takes over the pride. Is that morally wrong? We don’t feel so. Because lions do not have higher order thinking to give rise to ‘morality for their actions’.
Rape is more of an act of dominance. I’ve seen animals ‘commit rape’. Do they get prosecuted for their actions? Of course not. That would be absurd.
A few days ago, a big white duck came into our lawn and started ‘raping’ our female duck. I immediatey got infuriated and threw stones at him (near him, actually) until he left. So was it just for me to feel the need to ‘punish’ that duck for his actions? No! It was his nature to seek out a female. If anything, hurting that duck would have created a row between us and the neighbour who owned that male duck. So I never even aimed for his body.
If man’s natural instincts should be curbed for the betterment of the society, I don’t see why women’s natural instincts that are detrimenta to the society shoud not be curbed. But of course, they would confuse that with patriarchy and ‘steaing their freedom’.
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678