Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Women and states batlle plan for males decimation ?
This topic contains 19 replies, has 17 voices, and was last updated by 
Mango Ingaway 3 years, 10 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Notice : sorry for spelling mistakes (all my English teachers were women (
joke) and the “skilled” too beautiful to be listened).The base of the theory :
Only 10 % of males are necessary in any breeding of mammal. So males are always the surnumerous gender in terms of mammal reproduction.Men have a place in society as useful gender only. This is why our’s ancients created what feminist call patriarchy (ancient knew the danger to be the surnumerous gender and not having the a counter-power)
(explain very well here by a switzerland academic (mangina but a clever one) (unfortunately not translated) http://graduateinstitute.ch/files/live/sites/iheid/files/sites/genre/shared/Genre_docs/2889_Actes2000/11_meillas.pdf)
Based on the fact that feminist ask for :
Surrogacy woldwide ban.
No legal restriction for women on medically assisted procreation services
Rights for women to choose the sex of the baby (my body my choice bla bla bla).
No legal restriction on sperm donation or market
States more and more replace father when mothers are singles (for example in France a new law guarantee since march 2016 to mothers unpaid alimony (of course father still go to jail if they can’t pay but state pay the mothers)Based on the fact that men physical force value won’t be necessary with robots revolution coming, (so men won’t be not anymore a useful gender and only a surnumerous gender).
Based on the fact that school program are designed for women success and more and more boys are not graduate.
Due to overpopulation (10 billion human in 2050 – and less and less ressource), States will necessarily conduct natality regulation BUT combined with gynocentrism, robot, open medically assisted procreation for single women, biotech (especialy the possibility to choose the baby sex) democratic system (were women are the majority of registered voters).
Gynarchie and male decimation is coming ?.
Science fiction ? Delirium ? … what do u think ?
I swear by my life and my love of it that I will never live for the sake of a woman, nor ask a woman to live for mine.
Anonymous54Who will women blame stuff on if theres no Men around.
I agree. You see it in the American deer population.
Americans generally get a tag to shoot a male deer. Then you have to get a special tag to shoot a female deer.
Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.
Gynarchie and male decimation is coming ?.
It’s already here if you ask me.
I think the robots replacing us is a good thing.
At least we’ll be left alone.
And if they want to destroy us by force cause we no longer serve them they can always try.
I got the stakes ready i can be a modern count Dracula if forced.Who will women blame stuff on if theres no Men around.
The dead men.
The way I see this turning out, based on your feminist check list, I can see the future from 2016 being:
No legal restriction for women on medically assisted procreation services.
No legal restriction on sperm donation or market.
Rights for women to choose the sex of the baby (my body my choice bla bla bla).
Based on the fact that men physical force value won’t be necessary with robots revolution coming.A massive spike in single mothers. Since there is no restrictions on IVF (In Vitro Fertilization) and an ample supply of high quality sperm, women won’t need to trap a man to satisfy their BABY RABIES. As they can choose the sex of their spawn, their narcissism and the fact that boys will be less valuable in the workplace, due to robotic/AI automation, they will tend to have daughters.
States more and more replace father when mothers are singles (for example in France a new law guarantee since march 2016 to mothers unpaid alimony (of course father still go to jail if they can’t pay but state pay the mothers)
To pay for all these girls popping out into the world is the good old Government handouts. Without the need for men to make the baby, with their diminished earning power due to robotics, women will see welfare as a more lucrative source of income. So buh-bye father hood.
Based on the fact that school program are designed for women success and more and more boys are not graduate.
As the years roll on and the female population rises, the ever shrinking number of boys who are born, will have to go into the ever shrinking low skill labor sector… or the military, which is the most likely option due the ever increasing threat of…
Due to overpopulation (10 billion human in 2050 – and less and less ressource), States will necessarily conduct natality regulation
If history has taught us anything, it’s that when a nation is faced with it’s very survival, might makes right!
The oil wars will give way to the water wars and of course it’s the men who will be fighting those wars. So the dwindling male population is going to get decimated over the following years of resource wars between nations.
With the lessening population of men to support the technological infrastructure since lets face it, women can’t do that type of work… well not on the scale it would need to be done, the modern world will quickly begin to break down to the days before the industrial revolution, if not worse.
At the end of all this, the world is going to be Furiosa Road (featuring Mad Max… maybe, if there are any men left).
Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.yes there are ways to engineer sex-specific bioweapons that could selectively attack males and cause infertility/sickness/death that can be easily and covertly administered through say mandatory vaccines and later claim it was an accident.
Because robotics are not advanced and cheap enough yet to replace male worker drones to any sizeable extent – the current strategy heavily relies on emasculation of men instead – using sociologic pressures, legal system, media programming to psychologically break down manhood and make strong rebellious men into obedient hen-pecked manginas; and chemical means – using household items, food, water and medicine to mess up your endocrine system until you turn gay or start drooling (or both).
But yeah, if I decide to go back to school – I’m probably going with robotics engineering. With all the robots and automation in the future – some men will only be needed to maintain all that s~~~.
proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome
With the lessening population of men to support the technological infrastructure since lets face it, women can’t do that type of work… well not on the scale it would need to be done, the modern world will quickly begin to break down to the days before the industrial revolution, if not worse.
Yea. A good example of this can be seen beneath New York City. The piping of the city of NYC is over a century old, and decades passed use date. It is estimated that a quarter of the piping in NYC is on the verge of breaking.
And NYC had done nothing to fix this. Instead of fixing the leaks, they are plugging the NYC piping into a new underground source of water (Water Tunnel No. 3), which will increase the water pressure on these weak pipes.
It should also be noted that a fault line runs right through Central Park. One minor quake. One that you might not even feel above ground, tracks so fast under the ground, that is could break many weak pipes under ground.
And civilization cannot function without water.
Now, back to the topic at hand. Feminists want to destroy men to being the point of being less then ten percent of the population and slave labor because they are born men.
If one nation tried this and then sent these men to war. The other side would not even have to fire a shot. Just offer than a deal. The men would likely take it. And the other nation would overrun the feminist nation.
We men are usually very straight forward. Anyone with a brain could cut a deal with a slave class of men. It is not hard. And the price would be very minor. Also, slaves holds no loyalty to their masters.
The whole point of MGTOW is that we men are walking away from a raw deal. Because we feel this society is not worth fighting over. That society is already doomed.
Everyone has a breaking point to their tolerance. Even the most pussy whipped manginas and the most stubborn white knights. And committing genocide with the guarantee they WON’T get pussy afterward is one bridge to far even for them.
Just curious – does anyone have a link to any feminists publicly taking the position that there should only be 10% men?
I know there is at least one study/paper like that, but it was more of an exploration of it. I’m wondering if any of them have actively come out in favor of this position?
"Data, I would be delighted to offer any advice I can on understanding women. When I have some, I'll let you know." --Captain Picard,
As fun this may be for feminists to consider there is a simple natural law that takes precedence over everything:
The law of economics; not on the money side but the labor side and energy side in general.
Fact 1: Robots cannot replace human dexterity and are not predicted to reach that stage for at least half a century.
Fact 2: A robotic workforce of such kind needs a kind of infrastructure that is non existent and impossible to achieve with any foreseeable technology. That infrastructure is the energy infrastructure for the building, running and maintaining such an obscene large number of running machinery.
Fact 2 is the key problem and the impossible wall to surpass, to cut it short humans are very energy efficient in comparison to any machine. The food to energy metabolism of the average human machine is a pittance in comparison to the demand of any foreseeable machine that would do the same job. The idle metabolic rate of the average man is 2 kilocalories which is the equivalent of 8.5 kilojoules per day. 2.000 calories may sound a lot but food with such a caloric content is easy and cheap to procure, an active man who is working an average will require around 4 kilocallories which mean that he will consume the equivalent of 17 kilojoules in a day.
Now who wants to do the math on how energy efficient a machine that does what a human does must be in order to push men out of the loop?
Let me tell you that 1 Watt = 1 joule per second which means that a human who burned 17 kilojoules of energy burned a Watt of energy every 5 seconds (86400/17000), which gives us a consumption of 60W per five minutes.
That’s the equivalent of a just a 60W light-bulb running all day.
Let me tell you that 1 Watt = 1 joule per second which means that a human who burned 17 kilojoules of energy burned a Watt of energy every 5 seconds (86400/17000), which gives us a consumption of 60W per five minutes.
That’s the equivalent of a just a 60W light-bulb running all day.
Clarification because I am an idiot: A 60W light bulb burns 60 Watts every five minutes.
yes there are ways to engineer sex-specific bioweapons that could selectively attack males and cause .
This has already been published in the scientific literature. If you know what to look for.
Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.
Anonymous3Greekdragon is totaly right. There will not be a robotic society because we cannot built efective robots yet (and never will, the way things are going…)
In a Dune like statment I would say that WE (humans) are losing our edge due to the sofness of our enviroment. WE are getting ever less capable, and worst by each generation.
Women and feminism are getting things a lot worst in terms of sofness and unefectivness. In a short number of years everything will crumble.
There is a war going on, but its a feminine war, a war of manipulation and deceive. Men cannot fight this war, and do not have to: it is a self-defeating war.
20 years ago I was teaching physics to 9th grade and one student was using a old book. I found out it was her father’s 4th grade book. It had all the subjects I was teaching and a lot more! And my father at the time had to help his father in the farm while doing the 4th grade. I quit teaching: no professional realization there.
My younger kid barely writes a full sentence and doesnt use commas or paragraphs. But his mother insists in doing papers for him, written at adult level – not even pretending. She is a teacher and claims all teachers know that parents do kid’s work, and only the grade matter.
This will not work for long. We are aproaching game over due do diminishing returns at every level.
Let me tell you that 1 Watt = 1 joule per second which means that a human who burned 17 kilojoules of energy burned a Watt of energy every 5 seconds (86400/17000), which gives us a consumption of 60W per five minutes.
That’s the equivalent of a just a 60W light-bulb running all day.
Clarification because I am an idiot: A 60W light bulb burns 60 Watts every five minutes.Wattage consumption is base on the hour. For example a 60 watt bulb burns 60 watts of electricity per hour. As I understand it a human would burn 720 watts per hour, 3600 seconds per hour divided by 1 watt per 5 seconds = 720 watts per hour. Please correct if wrong.
Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.
Just curious – does anyone have a link to any feminists publicly taking the position that there should only be 10% men?
I know there is at least one study/paper like that, but it was more of an exploration of it. I’m wondering if any of them have actively come out in favor of this position?
Sally Miller-Gearhart in her book “Future – if there is one – is female” stated that men should be reduced and maintaned to 10% of human population.
Mary Daly stated that the evolution of humanity requires a drastic reduction of the percentage of men.
Both Daly and Miller-Gearhart are very respected in academia, pioneers of women’s studies, and girls in women’s studies read their books as academic texts.
Those are serious thoughts by feminists. It’s not like Valerie Solanas or The Femitheist (Solanas was exaggerated and mad, Krista Jane is a good lady who loves provocations), that’s academic feminism.Personally I’m pretty sure it’s going to happen in the west: we are already seeing it with couples using sex-selection: 80% of requests are for girls, and keep in mind that those couples even include a father…I guess the percentage it’s about 90% for single mothers and over 95% for lesbians.
I’m not sure about what will happen with the muslims, or how things will go in India and China.
I think that the new female-dominated society will have to develop genetic-based weapons targetting males if they wish to survive against the future pressure by muslims.SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Anonymous7I hear this crap over and over and it gets old.
No, men are not going anywhere.
Feminism idiology happens right before a society collapses because it is not sustainable. Replace the husband with the government and it’s all downhill like a giant rolling boulder.
There is a time window where it can be fixed: But it won’t be fixed. The gynocentric powers that be will be marching “ever onwards!” towards the inevitable destruction of western society in complete denial.Always will be that way.
Take Rome for example and compare it to the western world today. https://heartiste.wordpress.com/2010/12/27/feminism-responsible-for-the-fall-of-rome/
Who do you think the barbarians will be to take down the west?
Radical muslims. And there they are right on the news every damn day.
We let them in the front door, and Europe thought they were being progressive by doing so.
No. They were letting in militaristic colonists.Do you think that men have the heart today to fight to save what the gynocentric west has become? Do you think men will sacrifice their lives for “this”?
Another reason that men aren’t going to be whittled down to 10% of women is that women don’t do s~~~. They are the managers (you know: The s~~~ty ones), liberal arts “work” like gender studies issues (pfft.), counselors, teachers, customer service workers, blah blah blah.
Men are the engineers, construction workers, plumbers, electricians, developers, builders, the warriors.
Women fear male contraception, enhanced virtual reality, sex robots, and artificial wombs which are all on the way.
So the way I see it, it will all collapse, or women are made redundant, not the other way around.
Robots can’t do what you are envisioning them doing. Customer service? Check. Dreaming up new inventions? Nope. Teaching? Check. Plumbling? Nope. Counselors? Maybe. Check. Electricians? Nope.
Seeing a pattern?
Men are not going to be replaced by robots. Male population is not going to be reduced to 10%.
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
Let me tell you that 1 Watt = 1 joule per second which means that a human who burned 17 kilojoules of energy burned a Watt of energy every 5 seconds (86400/17000), which gives us a consumption of 60W per five minutes.
That’s the equivalent of a just a 60W light-bulb running all day.
Clarification because I am an idiot: A 60W light bulb burns 60 Watts every five minutes.Wattage consumption is base on the hour. For example a 60 watt bulb burns 60 watts of electricity per hour. As I understand it a human would burn 720 watts per hour, 3600 seconds per hour divided by 1 watt per 5 seconds = 720 watts per hour. Please correct if wrong.
Correct, that was a late night mistake by me.
Still at 720 Watt equivalent per hour humans are still very efficient for what we do.
I think a computer with sufficient intelligence, will simply wipe the human race away like a s~~~ stain. Their is no way in hell would have a chance against something that powerful.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
The western liberal tradition of individualism happens to undermine group identities from doing much of anything. There isn’t going to be a war by the state to reduce the population of men. It just isn’t going to happen. A bunch of these fantasies in the MGTOWsphere aren’t going to happen. If you being MGTOW is because you want them to be so, then you are going to burn out.
What I say matters is each man going MGTOW get on with his life and get as strong of a hand as possible, to bargain with the world. A man going MGTOW doing that will be better off.
That is my 2 cents on this. You can do whatever you like.
"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.
No, they need men, so the ycan let men take all the decisions and then blame them for “making the wrong choices”.
A world with 90% females in it?
Females can’t stand each other, I doubt it lmaoIt is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
