Women And Manginas Keep Pushing Campaign Against Sex Robots

[HereticParticipant 151]

Campaign targets sex robots for potential to exacerbate sexual violence

You know what I find extremely hypocritical about all this? Is that women have had decent sex toys for more than 50 years or so? And now once men are getting really great sex toys such as sex robots, society wants them gone.

I’ll be really glad when sex robots get a little more advanced and we can just use virtual reality headsets alongside them. That would be f~~~ing awesome.

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

The same has been said about video games, pornography, and rock ‘n roll.

None of these has been proven to be true, especially in light of the fact that rape in the US has been on the decline for some years now.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[Anonymous 3]

Let them spend their time and energy on that, rather than trying to take this site down and otherwise meddling with men’s affairs. We would all be better off if they would just leave us alone.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

They only want to ban sex robots with a vagina. Sex robots with a dido are OK.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[HitmanParticipant]

control .
they fear the robots due to the fact women are replaceable.
they must try and control men.
F~~~ THEM .
how many married men would buy a sex robot?
only the one’s whose wives would “let them “.
not too many..
single guys would buy them and the nightclubs and bars would empty.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Once sex robots are perfected, women lose some of their power and control over men. Women realize that sex robots would make it harder for them to divorce rape men and bleed men of their resources. Sex robots don’t get old and they also have an off switch. What modern bitch can compete with that?

[AttonParticipant]

Smells like gynocentrism.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

Heretic wrote:

You know what I find extremely hypocritical about all this? Is that women have had decent sex toys for more than 50 years or so

This.

Hitman wrote:

control .
they fear the robots due to the fact women are replaceable.
they must try and control men.

But moreso, this.

[Wolf redpillmanSpectator 1658]

Of courses they are because thoses feminist knows their only power is at risk, and that manginas chumps wants every men’s to be as miserable as them by being married and worship some c~~~

[hmskl’dParticipant 6408]

Prior to about the year 1973, students went through their entire educations including college and graduate school doing math, physics and chemistry problems either long hand or using an apparatus called a slide rule. There were no portable hand held calculators .. not even for the most basic addition and subtraction. The first affordable portable calculators in the early 1970’s cost about one hundred dollars and had four functions .. and if you were lucky a single memory and possibly a square root key.
Eventually, if you were willing to spend fairly big money you could get some scientific notation keys.
My point is .. now you can get a decent scientific calculator in the checkout aisle of the supermarket for a few dollars .. basically pocket change.
Such will be the case for advanced companionship .. initially expensive; given time it will not only be the norm but will outperform anything human. The technology is not only going to be affordable and cost effective but will also offer features, bells and whistles that will make human-human relations essentially redundant for many people. The women should be afraid. Nothing they can do will stop the massive development of these virtual and robotic interactions in our daily lives.

[LowKeyParticipant 702]

I daresay this “campaign” is led by women

Women dont offer companionships nowadays so the only thing they can offer a man is sex to which they’re aware and if this flies off they (women) know that their values would be reduce to 0.

Don't let defeat, defeat you; Let defeat be your greatest teacher.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22531]

It would be poetic, if women were able to ban sex robots, that their law was so broad that it banned vibrators as well. And technically a vibrator is a “sex robot”. A vibrator is electronic, it has controls, it moves on command, and its sole function is designed to bring sexual pleasure. As such a vibrator is a “sex robot”.

[Deadly RaverParticipant]

I think the terror is two fold for women, but both sides lead back to one definite outcome: Them losing power over men.

Now, this is the part we are all aware of as MGTOW. An ever increasing number of men would choose the sex robot over a woman these days. One thing they fear the most, ironically, is that the PUA community would be effected by this. MGTOW are men who have already said “No” to relationships with women. For what I’m sure is true for a lot of us, the pussy was never our only goal, and probably wasn’t even the big goal for most of us. Unfortunately, we have learned that love is pretty much dead these days. We don’t care about these women, we don’t show them affection, we don’t bow to them,we won’t give to them, and we don’t cater to them. We won’t even acknowledge them in many cases. We aren’t the enemy no matter how hard they try to make it look like we are. In short, if every MGTOW bought one of these sex bots, it wouldn’t matter.

What matters? This.

The first side: PUAs. Unlike MGTOWs, PUAs are the kind of men who chase after the pussy. These are the men who cater to the wants and desires of these women so that they can get to their ultimate goal, sex. Unfortunately for the ladies, these men aren’t the kind who are going to fix things when they break or hold them when they are hurt, be it physically, mentally, and DOUBLE SQUARE ROOT TIMES 9000+1 DAMN SURE NOT EMOTIONALLY. In the end, the PUAs will use the women the way the women use men.

Now, what happens if these men, even if only a few of them, start saying,”Well, Gonna go bust a nut!” And turns on Sexy Susie program 2.x? Well, HE damn sure ain’t leaving the house. if he’s not leaving the house, he’s not at the bar buying her a beer. If he’s not at the bar buying her a beer………………SHE’S NOT GETTING HIS ATTENTION. That part was in all caps because that’s not even half of how hard it will be hitting the inside of her brain. Remember that videoclip of the woman freaking out because men wouldn’t buy her a drink? Yeah. Imagine if that happened to 100 women? Now imagine it happening over the next 100 days. You get the idea. That’s a lot of dry glasses and unsold booze right there. And, of most importance to those ladies, that’s a lot of unused vagina and wasted makeup. The part that will smash through their psyches and burn through any excuse they try to erect is that THEY DIDN’T GET CHOSEN. If you thought that other chick blew a fuse when it happened to her, multiply that times 100 for 1 weekend. The next Monday, the local restaurants will be filled with “nice guys” getting their shoulders drowned in female tears.

…………………..Unless……………….

The second side: Manginas, White Knights, “blue pill men,” etc. Now, these poor souls here are catching the WORST of deals. Far more often than not, they are being used for their resources, emotional tampons as the phrase goes, being dragged out to do whatever the woman wants because they are such good “friends”.

Face it. They are nothing more than utilities to be used. They might think they are men, but she sure as hell does NOT. Sadly enough, many of them know it in some part of their hearts, Whether it is because of always getting an excuse as to why she can’t go on a date with them, the constant crying about how they can’t find a good man, or how her last date ended with him dumping her after using her for sex, only getting a call from the girl when she needs them for something, or any other instances. Well, these guys feel pain. Sooner or later, they also want something more from their life than being on call for someone who has never shown them even the slightest amount of affection. I mean, she only ever calls you for HER needs, never yours. If that’s the case, they may as well have a high tech doll around.

………And believe me, the more guys who see their friends going that route, the more they will start thinking with their heads too.

Next thing you know, It’s the Manginas who aren’t answering their phones, the White Knights who are breaking dinner dates, or are “Too Tired” to come help move furniture or do anything else that their “Friend” wants them to do, and the blue-pillers who are just plain out saying,”No ma’am. I don’t want to do that.”

That is what they fear the most. If THESE two types of men won’t even give in to them, they are lost. You think desperate men look bad? Wait until the shoe is kicking the ass of the OTHER half. Women are going to get a taste of the THIRST when the number of available men starts drying up. The part that will hurt the most, the most PAINFUL nail that will be stabbed into their hearts will be the inescapable fact that they did it to themselves. That they became so useless that they have been replaced with a barbie doll. At that point, female suicide rates might actually become half of what males are and the women’s suffrage movement will finally have a legit reason to exist.

EDIT: Damn. Got kinda long winded here. Sorry for the paragraphs, but I had a lot to say about this one.

Learn from the past, Control the present, and you will know the Future.

[BadgerParticipant 2277]

Good analysis, Deadly Raver.

Each group you mentioned will no longer be compelled to buy into turning over their life to a woman just for access to sex. It will be a great shift in power and control, and that is what they fear most. As so many have stated here and elsewhere, women need men more than men need women. Men will no longer have to accept their trap into economic slavery for the small return of sex.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

deadly raver, you nailed it.
when the average women can easily be replaced with a fembot, womens power over men will be over.

And dont forget, its a huge and competitive market, i think that in 5 years we will have a fembot in the market and in another 5 years it will be cheap enough for the average guy.

This is going to be hillarious to watch, just seat back and enjoy the show.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

That shows how much irrationals manginas are: widespread female sex robots would mean way less men interested about women, and by so it would mean way more available women for manginas. Manginas would have all to gain and nothing to lose from widespread female sex robots.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22531]

Deadly Raver wrote:

For what I’m sure is true for a lot of us, the pussy was never our only goal, and probably wasn’t even the big goal for most of us. Unfortunately, we have learned that love is pretty much dead these days.

Deadly Raver, you nailed the point. The point for many men is companionship. But, one cannot be a companion with someone that is a greedy, materialist, narcissistic, hedonist, whom is taught to hate and exploit men from before the time she can walk. With society rewarding women for being traitorous, greedy, and hedonistic. And society punishing men for being responsible and loyal.

[narwhalParticipant]

I love the attempt at a rational argument for the anti-sex robot stance.

The campaign claims these robots are potentially harmful and will diminish capacity for empathy and reinforce objectification and unequal power relations.

So, you don’t have empathy for someone unless you want to have sex with them? So I have empathy for another man, does that mean I’m gay? Or perhaps that means I’m only showing empathy towards him to impress a woman? If a woman or man has no desire for sex at all, does that mean they are incapable of empathy? Do children, who have no sexual desires yet, lack empathy?

And I’m sure that if she really believes remove the need to have sexual release with another human beings reduces empathy, then she must also be against any sexual toys of any nature, for men or women. She must be against pornography or the use of my right hand. She must also be against women withholding sex from a man, because that would reduce his ability to empathize for others.

You know what? Using her theory, I just thought of the perfect prisoner rehabilitation program. Line up the sex workers so the prisoners can increase their ability to empathize and be production members of society again!

Ok. Then do it.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

If women lose the stranglehold they have on sex to robots, they will be rendered powerless!
That is what the trollops fear most.

[Author]

Posts