Woman on Alimony – gives insight into how Women view Men

[RealityBitesParticipant 2198]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/nina-boug-lichtenstein/why-i-resent-the-term-ali_b_7942922.html

 

Pretty ugly stuff: to women: men are just a plow horse or a slave.

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

With a Ph. D. in French and English no wonder she is struggling to make ends meet.

Golly.  When her “dividends” run out, what will she ever do?

But it was when one of our teenage boys recently said to me “Pappa works hard; he supports all of us,” that I felt compelled to make a statement. If nothing else, for my boys: the next generation. Yes, their dad owns a business and that is hard work, no question about it. But a comment like that doesn’t fall easy on a writer and teacher’s ears, or heart, as if the work I do now, not to mention did while married and also running the household, is a walk in the park.

So she is educating her sons to understand that her work is more important, and therefore she should be entitled to up to 80% or her husbands income.

Goodness gracious.  Please give this woman two boards and three nails.

I’m sure the divorce is ever so legitimate.  I mean really.  She must have found it difficult to be happy anymore.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[FermatParticipant 3478]

This kind if mentality alone is why alimony is so painful. They enjoy watching you owe them. Watching you drain away your resources.  It us the best possible outcome for a woman. They get the freedom to bounce on c~~~s then returning home to kids who validate their vile existence while the man gives her money.  It’s a female paradise.  Sickening.

I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Noop … can’t carry on reading it … sorry.

It’s just the same old leech bitching as usual. Why can’t they just shut the fk up and take the money?

No .. they can’t …. after shredding her husband …. a triumph must be made.

One day it will stop … and when she looks in the mirror …. a dried up old husk will stare back.

[BestoftherestParticipant 285]

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln

[big_lou_louParticipant 6]

<span style=”color: #444444; font-family: NotoNashkArabic, Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium; white-space: pre-wrap;”>”The term alimony comes from the Latin word alimona and means “nourishment or sustenance,” and historically has had as its purpose the continued nourishment of the divorced wife, presumed to be lacking the ability to support herself”</span>

Well, since she can’t support herself, I can’t comprehend what is her objection with the term. And her son is right to say that his dad works hard to support them. And the rest of her whiny rant doesn’t dispute that fact : she works hard but yet is unable to sustain herself and her household without assistance. So she receives free money for “decades of investments” that were clearly misguided since they didn’t lead her to financial independence, but she complains about the name of her free monthly check ??? Wow…

[foolsgoldParticipant 5664]

What a c~~~. Makes me glad I’m divorced but I’d much rather be widowed.

[xgreenlanternoxParticipant 253]

big_lou_lou wrote:

<span style=”color: #444444; font-family: NotoNashkArabic, Helvetica, Roboto, Arial, sans-serif; font-size: medium; white-space: pre-wrap;”>”The term alimony comes from the Latin word alimona and means “nourishment or sustenance,” and historically has had as its purpose the continued nourishment of the divorced wife, presumed to be lacking the ability to support herself”</span> Well, since she can’t support herself, I can’t comprehend what is her objection with the term. And her son is right to say that his dad works hard to support them. And the rest of her whiny rant doesn’t dispute that fact : she works hard but yet is unable to sustain herself and her household without assistance. So she receives free money for “decades of investments” that were clearly misguided since they didn’t lead her to financial independence, but she complains about the name of her free monthly check ??? Wow…

Simple female nature my friend. She is the victim, she is owed this from the “horrible struggles and decades of abuse (investments) that she suffered”.

[BestoftherestParticipant 285]

big_lou_lou wrote:

Well, since she can’t support herself, I can’t comprehend what is her objection with the term. And her son is right to say that his dad works hard to support them. And the rest of her whiny rant doesn’t dispute that fact : she works hard but yet is unable to sustain herself and her household without assistance. So she receives free money for “decades of investments” that were clearly misguided since they didn’t lead her to financial independence, but she complains about the name of her free monthly check ??? Wow…

Funny huh.

She thinks she’s above the title of her income stream. Incidentally she is proud that her investment is paying her dividends.    Her logic is lacking and she is just butt hurt she has to carry the word alimony around.  Not the money, not the fact she got it from being a leech, just the name.

"Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Abraham Lincoln

[big_lou_louParticipant 6]

You say female nature, I see pure insanity…

[chirParticipant]

In reality she is just p~~~ed because one of her sons realized that his father works hard and supports all of them.  That sent her off the rails.  You see she may be separated from him but it gnaws at her that he is shoveling the gravel so that she can eat.  (with all of her useless education she cannot do that)  She will always be dependent on him until she marries another man so she can be dependent on him.  Deep down despite all of her laughable education she is still dependent on men and she knows it.  Which is why you can sense in the article she is on her way to becoming a bitter old crone.

Her article had one comment (saved here in case they delete it)

“alimony is a dividend from your investment in marriage? Did your husband not invest in the same marriage? he is not entitled to any dividends but rather to pay them out? You are rationalizing. You are convincing yourself that you are not a useless leach on another person’s hard work but the fact is that you are. Just accept it. You can change it or you can admit you’re a parasite. Don’t try to convince others you earned anything.”

 

It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

[RoyDalParticipant]

@bestoftherest,
Excellent video, thanks for posting it.

To mommies everywhere: A job you can do in your pajamas is not a real job. Get over yourselves!

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[BeerParticipant 11832]

If judges had a clue they’d be like listen c~~~ lips, your husband paid for you to get a phd over the course of your marriage, you aren’t being left with no education or skills.  Alimony had its place 100 years ago when people were married and had multiple kids before 25 and most women were sahms, meaning women generally had little to no work experience or education and the working world actually was biased against them…but today…its just a massive wtf.

From the sounds of it the dad must have already had the business up and running before they met, as it seems she was completely cut out of any ownership of the business…so basically low earning uneducated woman meets successful guy, is well provided for, pops out a few kids, and earns a phd while they are married, divorces him, expects continued access to his resources of which his ability to earn was created before her and would exist without ever having met her.

[Author]

Posts