Woman get 90% in divorce, Man pay debts higher then the remaining 10%

Topic by Gnostic

Gnostic

Home Forums Marriage & Divorce Woman get 90% in divorce, Man pay debts higher then the remaining 10%

This topic contains 13 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by Constantine  Constantine 3 years, 3 months ago.

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #319758
    +4
    Gnostic
    Gnostic
    Participant
    2491

    https://www.theguardian.com/money/2016/mar/14/divorce-judge-businesswoman-family-fortune-jane-morris
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Peter Morris, the managing director of a software company with a seven-figure turnover, was left with just £66,000

    Another judge, Judith Hughes QC, ordered the husband last July to pay £77,000 for unpaid maintenance and other debts “from his share”, effectively leaving him with nothing from the marriage.

    Awarding 90% of the family assets to her, the judge had said that she “needs adequate maintenance” because sacrificing her career had left her with a “low earning capacity… in her middle fifties with rusty skills.”
    Advertisement

    He pointed to “the husband’s very substantially larger earning capacity into the future” and his bigger pension pot.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    The man is 51 years old.

    There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

    #319765
    +4

    Anonymous
    42

    Place your b~~~~ in judge Judith Hughes hands via the c~~~ract of marriage and you loose both you b~~~~ in the blast!

    Go ahead and marry your b~~~~ to judge Judith Hughes gavel, what could possibly go wrong? ((((SLAM))))

    #319772
    +3
    Joetech
    joetech
    Participant

    I told ya the UK was F~~~ed upp!!!!!!

    "Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

    #319777
    +1
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    So don’t marry. Look what will happen to you.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #319828
    +3
    Rorschach
    Rorschach
    Participant
    2083

    If you give them crackers, sardines, water, and rags from walmart your a cruel bastard. If you give them a nice lifestyle full of luxury they become “used” to it. So you have to keep up their level of lifestyle after you part ways. Damned if you do, damned if you don’t.

    Hell I wouldn’t mind finding a woman capable of providing ME with a lifestyle for a change. So far the only ones I’ve found want a ring and a baby and mortgage yee-haw.

    The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "save us!"....... and i'll look down and whisper "No."

    #319847
    +2
    Joetech
    joetech
    Participant

    They probably left out the part where he gave his pocket change to the balef for court costs.

    "Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

    #319874
    +3

    Anonymous
    25

    I see a recruitment drive for mgtow

    Let women keep behaving like that, including those in positions of power

    When the majority of men refuse to have anything to do with women, they only have themselves to blame

    #319880
    +3
    ILiveAgain
    ILiveAgain
    Participant

    This is just good PR …. for us.

    I said it before …

    Let this guys corpse hang from the plantation gates as a warning to others.

    Enter and the olny way out is in a box or via mgtower’s tunnel.

    We must thank him for his sacrifice and honour his stupidity for the mgtow cause.

    Would the next idiot step forward. The judge is waiting.

    #319902
    +1

    Anonymous
    42

    Enter and the olny way out is in a box or via mgtower’s tunnel.

    #319906
    +1
    Honorable_Juice_Box
    Honorable_Juice_Box
    Participant
    591

    the judge had said that she “needs adequate maintenance” because sacrificing her career had left her with a “low earning capacity… in her middle fifties with rusty skills.”
    Advertisement

    He pointed to “the husband’s very substantially larger earning capacity into the future” and his bigger pension pot.

    Funny, the judge is essentially saying that the man clearly has the higher potential to earn in the future, while the woman is somehow handicapped. That’s sexist. . .

    #320045
    +2
    NoBrand
    NoBrand
    Participant
    24

    I will never understand why men want to get married in the first place when a tsunami of enforcement laws will come crashing in on them should she decide to end it all. Ok, I know that we are all emotional beings and that some men want children and become naturally attached to them. That’s normal but for me I chose another path. I’m a selfish bastard who likes my freedom and my solitude. I pay a price of course as we are a social species but I learned from my first and only marriage that what Einstein said was true and I’ve known too many people who will also adhere to his message. ” Insanity is doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results”.

    #320363
    +1
    Mr. Spock
    Mr. Spock
    Participant
    10907

    I like how these judges and c~~~s talk about sacrificing a “career” that never happened. She gave up her career….REALLY? As if they know for sure that her “career” was going to be successful.
    I played baseball as a child and gave it up because it interfered with my education. Should I sue the school because I gave up a CHANCE at a career in baseball just to pull good grades?
    F~~~ the c~~~s.

    Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

    #320387
    +1
    Beer
    Beer
    Participant
    11832

    I’m a selfish bastard who likes my freedom and my solitude.

    Are you really even selfish just for not wanting to get f~~~ed over by divorce? Not wanting to hand over 50% or more of your s~~~ just because you have a romantic relationship that doesn’t work isn’t selfish, its common sense.

    I like how these judges and c~~~s talk about sacrificing a “career” that never happened. She gave up her career….REALLY? As if they know for sure that her “career” was going to be successful.

    Yeah its a f~~~ing joke lol. My last gf for example went to college to be a social worker, and was working as a social worker not making a whole ton of money. Odds are 10 or 20 years down the road from now…she’s still not going to be making much money because she went into a low paying field. If we married and he kids and she stayed at home for a few years, then we divorced…as far as I’m concerned she had a free f~~~ing ride for a few years…she should be thanking me, not pointing the finger saying I ruined her career.

    Now let’s also take into account…how many c~~~s stay home against their husbands wishes? I wouldn’t count that as ruining a career. It just happened to a coworker of mine. His wife was a teacher making pretty good money, and just finished up the extra school and training to become a principal and make even more money, then she got pregnant, had the kid, and told him she wasn’t going back to work. Now he’s stuck working every bit of overtime he can get to make ends meet. Poor guy looks worn out as f~~~ every time I see him now. It just gets even worse because if she wants to divorce him a few years down the road, they’re going to base the amount of divorce cash and prizes she gets from him off his last few years earnings that would have been grossly inflated by the fact he was forced to work so much overtime. Poor guy thought he’d have a comfy life making 200k between him and his wife soon as she upgraded from the teacher gig to a principal somewhere, and instead they are now making less as a couple than ever before while he’s putting in more hours than ever and she literally owns his ass for the next 18 years.

    #320746
    +1
    Constantine
    Constantine
    Participant
    4417

    I like how these judges and c~~~s talk about sacrificing a “career” that never happened. She gave up her career….REALLY? As if they know for sure that her “career” was going to be successful.
    I played baseball as a child and gave it up because it interfered with my education. Should I sue the school because I gave up a CHANCE at a career in baseball just to pull good grades?
    F~~~ the c~~~s.

    YES!!! I am sick of these lazy-arse women getting extra “compensation” because they supposedly agreed to put their careers on hold! Who the hell forced them to do this? Were they bullied or pressurised into it? If so, did it occur to them to just say no, or perhaps leave the guy because he was being too forceful? Is that how it was – or did she just stay at home after marrying because she didn’t think that she needed to work anymore?

    Maybe one day – and that is a very serious maybe – pictures like this will become a reality. The problem with these sob stories, like the sad one relayed about Peter Morris, is that they make that day seem not just distant, but about as likely as Nixon rising from the grave and being re-elected.

    Yup

    To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell

Viewing 14 posts - 1 through 14 (of 14 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.