Woman admits that nice guys get the leftovers

[Space CowboyParticipant 1466]

Wait wait wait… So you’re telling me that THEY are telling ME that I am now worthy after years of being told I’m not?. They now choose me?.

I’ll tell you the truth, the assholes and chads that have ran through them for the last few decades now turn her down because she looks like s~~~. They are laughing at her and f~~~ing the new wave of sluts.

The only reasons she would ever choose something she never wanted in her life are these. She wants your MONEY. She wants to look like part of a normal couple. Because Chad won’t have her, she has literally no other option. This is why after initial settling in and securing your resources, she f~~~ing hates you. You remind her that she’s been lied too all her life and that she has FAILED.

Obviously we have to be thankful and jump through hoops to try to please her.

"Have you ever thought about any real freedoms? Freedom from the opinions of others...even from the opinions of yourself?"

[Anonymous 3]

sjt1975 wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

I don’t see why women should be attracted to weak moronic blue pilled “men” who are focused on pleasing women and also doing it wrong.

What’s the problem?

I agree; women shouldn’t be attracted to ‘weak men’. Women should be attracted to ‘good men’ instead (i.e. men who are financially stable, level-headed, caring, and loyal), but they aren’t, due to their f*cked-up biology. There are different types of strength.

WTF is a good man anyway in your mind? A beta workhorse? How is that “good”?

Here is my definition of a good man: strong, authoritative, of strong moral and physical strength, great wisdom and reason. This man is not “equal” to a woman, but stands far above her, because women completely lack in all those traits. This man will physically discipline and otherwise completely dominate the weaker, inferior female.

You read that definition, and you will insist “that is not a good man!” and will repeat the female programming back that is a misogynist etc.

Yet you go through all of history, and prior to feminism “good men” behaved in this manner and were all over the place.

This is the falsity of feminism. This idea that women are equal. How could they be? They are weaker, dumber and immoral. It is absolutely impossible for them to be on equal standing to a capable man. Hence why men had to be dragged down to women’s level. Women could NEVER reach the level of a good man. And most men were indeed good in the past.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

sjt1975 wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

I don’t see why women should be attracted to weak moronic blue pilled “men” who are focused on pleasing women and also doing it wrong.

What’s the problem?

I agree; women shouldn’t be attracted to ‘weak men’. Women should be attracted to ‘good men’ instead (i.e. men who are financially stable, level-headed, caring, and loyal), but they aren’t, due to their f*cked-up biology. There are different types of strength.

WTF is a good man anyway in your mind? A beta workhorse? How is that “good”?

Here is my definition of a good man: strong, authoritative, of strong moral and physical strength, great wisdom and reason. This man is not “equal” to a woman, but stands far above her, because women completely lack in all those traits. This man will physically discipline and otherwise completely dominate the weaker, inferior female.

You read that definition, and you will insist “that is not a good man!” and will repeat the female programming back that is a misogynist etc.

Yet you go through all of history, and prior to feminism “good men” behaved in this manner and were all over the place.

This is the falsity of feminism. This idea that women are equal. How could they be? They are weaker, dumber and immoral. It is absolutely impossible for them to be on equal standing to a capable man. Hence why men had to be dragged down to women’s level. Women could NEVER reach the level of a good man. And most men were indeed good in the past.

I suspect that there are many self-proclaimed MGTOW who actually dream about signing a marriage contract with a woman.
All most them need is a woman who had very few partners, and they’ll fall for her.

I don’t take such s~~~, because my ex wife was conservative, from a good family, and I was her second partner: first being a guy who had been together with her for more than 6 years.
She was even extremely good a cooking and I never changed a single diaper to the children.
As far as I know she never cheated on me.

Still, she used sex as manipulation tool, controlled 80% (at least) of family money while making 40% family money, she had princess complex, “I’m never at fault” attitude, and she had compulsory shopping syndrome.

I never had been divorce raped, I did lost just only about a third of my stuff, and I practically meet the children every time I wish to do it.
Still, law were in her favor, and she could do much more damage if she wished to.

That’s already enough for me.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[sjt1975Participant 2536]

Anonymous wrote:

sjt1975 wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

I don’t see why women should be attracted to weak moronic blue pilled “men” who are focused on pleasing women and also doing it wrong.

What’s the problem?

I agree; women shouldn’t be attracted to ‘weak men’. Women should be attracted to ‘good men’ instead (i.e. men who are financially stable, level-headed, caring, and loyal), but they aren’t, due to their f*cked-up biology. There are different types of strength.

WTF is a good man anyway in your mind? A beta workhorse? How is that “good”?

Here is my definition of a good man: strong, authoritative, of strong moral and physical strength, great wisdom and reason. This man is not “equal” to a woman, but stands far above her, because women completely lack in all those traits. This man will physically discipline and otherwise completely dominate the weaker, inferior female.

You read that definition, and you will insist “that is not a good man!” and will repeat the female programming back that is a misogynist etc.

Yet you go through all of history, and prior to feminism “good men” behaved in this manner and were all over the place.

This is the falsity of feminism. This idea that women are equal. How could they be? They are weaker, dumber and immoral. It is absolutely impossible for them to be on equal standing to a capable man. Hence why men had to be dragged down to women’s level. Women could NEVER reach the level of a good man. And most men were indeed good in the past.

I believe that a man with such qualities is a good man, but I didn’t say that a man with such qualities should be a slave to a woman, nor that those are the only qualities/characteristics of a good man. Your definition of a ‘good man’ is also valid. There are lots of combinations of qualities/characteristics that make a man good.

[sjt1975Participant 2536]

Eric Lauder wrote:

sjt1975 wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

I don’t see why women should be attracted to weak moronic blue pilled “men” who are focused on pleasing women and also doing it wrong.

What’s the problem?

I agree; women shouldn’t be attracted to ‘weak men’. Women should be attracted to ‘good men’ instead (i.e. men who are financially stable, level-headed, caring, and loyal), but they aren’t, due to their f*cked-up biology. There are different types of strength.

I don’t fall for such tradcon s~~~.

If you wish to be the workhorse (“financially stable, level-headed, caring, and loyal”) of a woman that’s your choice, but that’s still “women have rights, men have responsibilites”.

Good luck, but MGTOW is another thing: it’s freedom from having responsibilities towards women.

I believe that a man who has those qualities is a good man. All I am saying is that a woman should be attracted to such a good man, but she isn’t. A man with those qualities can still be MGTOW; he just doesn’t enter in to a relationship with a woman.

[Anonymous 2]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Murph wrote:

It’s called “alpha f~~~s, beta bucks”. Women have no respect for manginas, which is why they keep them in the friend zone.

And “men” who stay in the so-called “friend zone” totally lack respect for themselves, so they deserve it.

The problem is, men are conditioned from their earliest days to believe that “nice guys” are what girls want. Many of these men grew up in single mother households and were spoon-fed this “women want nice guys” bulls~~~. They’re also conditioned by society to believe it as well. The problem is, we don’t have men raising men anymore because fathers are considered nothing but walking ATM machines by the government.

Yes, men bring it on themselves when they act like manginas, but keep in mind that nobody chooses to be indoctrinated into believing bulls~~~. These guys didn’t choose to grow up being raised by single mothers who indoctrinated them into believing that being a mangina was how to get a woman. You just have to hope that reality will wake them up sooner or later. Usually, they need to be hit with harsh truth.

I got a guy to stop being a mangina after I told him “How many more times are you going to be the fool pandering to a woman and stroking her ego, and then watching the asshole take her to bed and f~~~ her?” Sure, it angered him at first, but the more he thought about it, the more he realized I was right. I told him “I’m not trying to shame you. I’m trying to wake you up. You’ve been brought up your whole life to believe this ‘nice guy’ s~~~ works when it really doesn’t. I want you to have some respect for yourself and stop letting yourself be a doormat for anyone with a vagina between their legs.”

Using harsh truth is half the battle. The other half is letting them know you’re not trying to insult them, but trying to get them to stop allowing themselves to be taken advantage of. It will make them more open to what you’re saying instead of just dismissing you as an asshole.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

Murph wrote:

It’s called “alpha f~~~s, beta bucks”. Women have no respect for manginas, which is why they keep them in the friend zone.

And “men” who stay in the so-called “friend zone” totally lack respect for themselves, so they deserve it.

The problem is, men are conditioned from their earliest days to believe that “nice guys” are what girls want. Many of these men grew up in single mother households and were spoon-fed this “women want nice guys” bulls~~~. They’re also conditioned by society to believe it as well. The problem is, we don’t have men raising men anymore because fathers are considered nothing but walking ATM machines by the government.

Yes, men bring it on themselves when they act like manginas, but keep in mind that nobody chooses to be indoctrinated into believing bulls~~~. These guys didn’t choose to grow up being raised by single mothers who indoctrinated them into believing that being a mangina was how to get a woman. You just have to hope that reality will wake them up sooner or later. Usually, they need to be hit with harsh truth.

No, most of those manginas are cowards and/or they have a very low level of intelligence.
A guy can be trained to “acting nice” but it doesn’t take too much time to understand that it doesn’t work: when a guy is 15-16 yo his hormones are RAGING and he have to f~~~: if “being nice” doesn’t work then he’s going to try another path, it’s not even a matter of few years, it’s a matter of few months.

I was slightly fat and also shy, banal looking, until 15.
Then I changed: hitted the gym, leather jacket and boots, original hairstyle, even painted my hair.
Changed attitude as well, initially it was just following a plot and not real, but it didn’t matter: it worked.

To those who tried to blabber about that, my answer always was: “I don’t care, I need to have sex”.
And just to be sure, initially I hitted just only on ugly girls and girls who were at least 5 years older than me.
Turned out that average (or even above the average) looking older girls were easier than ugly girls my same age: got it. Never hitted on ugly girls (or women) again since I was about 16.
And so on: try, fail, try again in a slightly different way with another one.
I never paid a drink to a woman but I spent lot of money for women: night clubs, 3-4 nights each week. Never less than 2 nights per week, sometimes even 5 nights per week, always 7 nights per week while in vacation.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts