Will women be sorry in 10-20 years?

Topic by FreeGhost

FreeGhost

Home Forums MGTOW Central Will women be sorry in 10-20 years?

Tagged: 

This topic contains 69 replies, has 39 voices, and was last updated by Knights Templar Rising  Knights Templar Rising 4 years, 7 months ago.

Viewing 10 posts - 61 through 70 (of 70 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #49252
    +1
    Peterfa
    peterfa
    Participant
    833

    This is my field. I know these things so let me answer this. No.

    The rebellion of the wicked is mighty and you cannot penetrate. I come from a dysfunctional family, I’ve been to dysfunctional schools and been abused by the system. I’ve been bullied around by so many people it’s not funny. I know dysfunction.

    The fact is almost nobody from dysfunctional systems chance. They just repeat their filth that they learned in childhood. They take up their roles and repeat them endlessly. The codependent looks for more losers to enable, the jerks look for their codependents and so on.

    They won’t be sorry, they’ll be happy because they’ll have their sadistic dreams met. They just want to feel like victims and that they will. It’ll make them very happy. They’re mentally damaged and they like it.

    The government will step in like the government always does and provide them with their restitution since apparently the government failed to produce quality men who will serve them unconditionally, work hard, and give them the money, and not complain when they are refused sex, but instead watch while they screw the losers who never work.

    No, they won’t be sorry. They’ll be happy. They’re hoping for men to go their own way so they can feel victims.

    Your duty as a man in the Chivalry code is to provide them with their happiness. It’s your job. Now, go and make them happy, and let them be sorry in 10/20 years.

    #49300
    +3
    Sam Raven
    Sam Raven
    Participant
    181

    In a social experiment they flashed hundreds of images of one half of the sexes on large groups of people of the opposite sex, so images of women in front of men, images of men in front of women, then asked them if they found each image attractive or not attractive and to indicate as such.

    Men found 80% of the women attractive.

    Women found 20% of the men attractive.

    With numbers like these, I don’t really care about them feeling sorry.

    #49306
    Sam Raven
    Sam Raven
    Participant
    181

    This just in. Laugh riot article: Kiwi females frustrated with the 91-to-100 ratio unable to satisfy their hypergamy. The poor things.

    Many paragraphs of MGTOW comedy gold. Im almost tempted to turn this into a “spot the bulls~~~” pop quiz …. if anyone can squeegee away the hamsters off that page long enough to read it. Because – as you know – “marrying down” is simply OUT of the f~~~ing question.

    Yeah keep eating that regret cake, they can grow fat and greasy on it.

    What put me off was they were using ‘green language’ word games by referring to those who stay single as ‘singletons’. There is a very similar word to that called ‘simpleton’ that describes someone of lower intelligence.

    Bet on it they created that word with a derogatory purpose in mind.

    “I used to look at men who wolf whistle at women from building sites as being a bit crude and to be ignored,” she says, sighing.

    “Now I sometimes find myself thinking some of them are actually quite good looking.”

    That’s part of the problem with women. They don’t even know what they want.

     

     

     

    #49320
    +2

    Will they regret things in 10 or 20 years?  Probably not.  They won’t take personal responsibility for their “bad decisions”, particularly when they were lusting after and on the carousel with Mr. Right With The $$$ and Fancy Car in high school.  Never mind that there might have been Mr. Nerd With Future Potential admiring them from afar.

     

    Of course, if the latter actually does make something of himself, he will be the one they “always” wanted.  Pig’s ear, I say.

     

    #49414
    +1
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35862

    The government will step in like the government always does and provide them with their restitution

    I’ll be amazed if the government can afford to provide them with a partially eaten half of a ham sammich in 20 years. Eighteen trillion in debt (and rising) after all.

    #49421
    +4
    BONE
    BONE
    Participant
    448

    Probably not, but society will be so far down the drain it won’t even matter anyway, 10-20 years? s~~~ I’ll give it about 5 at the rate things are going.

    #49540
    +1
    Peterfa
    peterfa
    Participant
    833

    @sidecare, they’ll tax the next generation, or the one that comes after that. A government that’s 18 trillion is obviously scrappy. What would a poor government not do?

    They’ll initiate a “Privilege Tax,” a, “Potential Rapist,” tax, or, “Because f~~~ you, that’s why,” tax and target it towards men, specifically. Then we’ll be barred from leaving our homes unless accompanied by a woman, and strictly forbidden from leaving the country. If we don’t work, we get thrown in the mines and become indebted forever to the company store.

    Of course that will collapse. You can’t cheat nature.

    #49548
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35862

    they’ll tax the next generation, or the one that comes after that.

    And then they’ll learn you can’t get blood from a turnip.’

    But this isn’t really about money. It’s about wealth and productivity. It doesn’t matter what laws they pass or how many paper dollars or qualtoos or whatever they forcibly shuffle around when there’s nothing left to buy with them. When you reward indolence by punishing productivity indolence only expands and productivity STOPS.

    #49558
    +1
    Beer
    Beer
    Participant
    11832

    Sidecar – Isn’t it amazing how so many people can’t understand that?  The more they give to the lazy people, the stupid people, and the f~~~ ups, the more people just say f~~~ it, I’m gonna be a lazy stupid f~~~ up because I’ll have the same standard of living sponging the system as I’d have at a s~~~ty job, only I work 0 hours instead of 40.

    I don’t know how many times I’ve had that debate in college…only to have some complete idiot be like “That is so stupid…nobody WANTS to be on welfare.”  Are you f~~~ing kidding me?  Everyone with no skills or education, who is too lazy to do straight up labor that will actually pay an uneducated/unskilled person decent money, that is stuck in a job making less than 30k a year at a full time job f~~~ing dreams of being on welfare…its literally a raise in their standard of living + they work 0 hours instead of 40.

    Funny thing is most the kids that were too stupid to see that are the ones that got buried under six figures of student loans.  The same liberal teachers that convinced them how great our welfare state is also convinced them to borrow a ton of money so college professors/admins could continue to make 100k+ a year….I mean so they could get a good education.

    #75500
    Knights Templar Rising
    Knights Templar Rising
    Participant
    5133

    Most will have extreme post 35 regret.  Past that age, men have given up on LTRs or want younger tail.

    But some are delusional for life.  A friend was perusing a site.  The woman was 56 and overweight, yet demanded that the man be “accomplished” (which around here is code for “six figures”).  Sure honey, an overweight 56yo with a sagging face is going to lock down a well salaried Lawyer… reality check in Aisle 6!

    Sovereignty above all else.

Viewing 10 posts - 61 through 70 (of 70 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.