Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Will feminists lose title IX after witch hunt against men and the 1/4 rape myth
This topic contains 12 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by jack reacher 3 years, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
“We expect this decision to have a significant impact on the manner in which courts view Title IX cases.”
Feminists made the mere accusation of sexual assault a guilty verdict and you are expelled from school with a sexual assault on your record.
Due to this there has been a skyrocketing increase of false accusations of sexual assault.
They started this from the top using the Dept of Education invented by Jimmy Carter and now used by the feds to funnel money to universities thus controlling universities for fear of loss of subsidies.
The Dept of Education issued an edict that said that you must set up a kangaroo court with expectation of automatic guilt.
Now the cases are making it to the courts and the Universities are being destroyed for lack of due process for the accused students.
Now it seems that the upshot will be court will decide to limit the kinds of cases title IX applies to removing a very potent weapon, threat of a title IX case, off the table because the court will not allow it.
Nice, feminists abused title IX and are now losing it…law of unintended consequences!
#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.
I highly doubt Feminism being effected in any negative way in our Gynocentric society.
Our society has yet to disconnect from the “putting women first above all others” mindset as a whole.
This will certainly open up the few eyes of men and may bring them towards MGTOW.
Anonymous42Imagine how stunned a guy must feel being punished without a trial, all the while being innocent! I bet the blood drains to your feet…
I’ve seen the dangers of this mass paranoia ever since the false allegations in the preschool sex scandals, a media sensation!
That was the first tank buster manmine I saw on the battlefield between woman, law, and men! This s~~~ has been going on for a long long time! It’s a war zone, and men are the target!
Thanks PuffinStuff-
I am amazed Title ix was ever passed in the 1970’s. It enabled witch hunts, with men being wrongfully accused and punished by feminists and their kangaroo courts.
Thank God men started suing the damned universities for this gross injustice. I hope the women get what is coming to them, although I am constantly amazed by womens’ creativity in sticking it to men.
This Is good news.
Sure wish he hadn’t dropped the slander case.
Fewer BS punches’d be thrown if blocked hard enough to break bone.
rhymeaccidental."It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."
It’s funny how useless and lazy they can be until it’s time to take their ex’s money, home, kids, etc. If they applied that ambition, tenacity and ruthlessness in the business world, they might actually accomplish things.
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
Yup, women will just find another loophole to screw men.
I’m not seeing how this implies that title IX could be lost. I don’t think it’s going anywhere. Agreed title IX and associated infrastructure has used to harm men, but will only mean that schools would need to actually operate treating genders equal when confronted with rape cases.
I see how it’s a win, but these types of wins always bug me…because they are still wrong and don’t fix the actual problem.
The Dept of Education is using tax payer money to govern rape allegations. That is wrong and is still wrong. It should be focused on the education level of your nation, and completely unconcerned with criminal cases. Title IX should have nothing to do with criminal cases.
Similarly I see college administrations interference in criminal cases like rape as obstruction of justice. They are advising students to report crimes to them and not to police, the proper authority.
I don’t believe public institutions should have the ability to expel students for activities that do not happen outside of school property. And even then, it should not be about punishing the student, but only about student safety and ability to learn. I don’t see how you can be sure that a student needs to be expelled unless there is clear evidence of the crime or the student has been charged in criminal court. Honestly, I would rather see a student given some sort of restraining order preventing them from entering the campus then the school expelling them.
In short, schools need to get out of the police business COMPLETELY. I am a big believer in systems that operate efficiently. When you have 2 or more departments trying to govern the same thing you always have a mess.
So is this a win? maybe. But it’s not really a step in the right direction to fix the root of the problem.
Ok. Then do it.
Yeah, Title IX. My favourite subject. There is a real dichotomy when it comes to serious allegations such as sexual harassment and sexual assault (rape).
Women know that reporting sexual harassment or sexual assault to the universities Title IX offices is reporting an infraction of the UNIVERSITY CODE OF CONDUCT, and the universities right to administer punishment on the basis of their own standard of proof (PREPONDERANCE OF EVIDENCE). Women know they are not charging a man with a criminal offence. All he’s getting is the boot from school. He’s not going to jail. It is a super revenge tool for the jilted female. So the university ploughs ahead with their kangaroo courts, and claim they are carrying out the Department of Education’s directives. Never mind the consequences to the poor f~~~ing accused.
The real argument is that these allegations of sexual harassment and assault are actually allegations of a criminal nature. If a guy is accused to them they should be dealt with by a proper court of law, not some Mickey Mouse single person arbitrator / investigator / lynch mob, where a guy is many cases not allowed to confront his accuser, not allowed legal representation, not allowed rules of evidence, not allowed right to cross examination. Just plain old not allowed the right to DUE PROCESS guaranteed under the constitution, with the standard of evidence required being WITHOUT REASONABLE DOUBT.
Of course there is Gender Bias. This wholesale refusal to allow DUE PROCESS is a clear gender discrimination. Universities are driven to register an increasing number of cases against men to prove they are doing a good job of protecting female students, and thus qualify for federal funds. F~~~ the poor alleged accused. He can easily afford to loose two or three years of university, loose his reputation (which will always be on his record), loose his ability to register at another university, amongst many other unforeseen consequences. F~~~ him. Who cares. He’s just a stupid f~~~ing mark. Dispensable.
It would seem that they cried wolf one too many times. Much like the ever expanding definition of rape. If even looking at women is considered rape, it will be unenforceable. And I think we’re in a transitional phase, where people are trying to experiment with appeasing these stupid c~~~s, but reality will come knocking like it has with this university. We really can’t get any more gynocentric without serious damage to everything. And when chaos ensues, people will stop taking these little claims as seriously, they will be dismissed as they should be.
Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.
highly doubt Feminism being effected in any negative way in our Gynocentric society.
Our society has yet to disconnect from the “putting women first above all others” mindset as a whole.
This will certainly open up the few eyes of men and may bring them towards MGTOW.
this guy knows what’s up
They are falling into the very pit they themselves dug it seems. Maybe they confused ‘gender equality’ with ‘female equality’. You see, ‘gender equality’ laws were never meant to protect male students…. they only made it sound like that. Now the very aw which they fabricated to protect them, is backfiring upon themseves. Good show!
A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.
Damn right Robert, let the accusation be thoroughly vetted in a court of law, with the benefit of legal representation. If the accuser feels so strongly, and of course she would not want what allegedly happened to her happening to another female, she would take it to a court and let the legal system vindicate her and her allegation.
But then she might actually be exposed for the bigoted, narcisstic fraud she is.- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678