Wikipedia is sinking.

[PhilandryParticipant 538]

Like every feminist structure, it seems Wikipedia is suffering the consequences.
As I looked for something there today it was screaming desperately for free money to keep going.
It expects me to pay actual money into a feminist led organisation? ROFLMAO!!!!!
Let it die!
Further proof that womyns destroy everything they touch.

Being a man is incredible good luck. Do not waste it on the unlucky.

[ghostParticipant]

This is not the first time I have seen that message. They aren’t going anywhere.

[Anonymous 3]

Wikipedia does a donation drive at the end of every year. How do you think they stay up in the first place?

Also I don’t know why you classify it as feminist. I use it for tech and to check entertainment or athlete records usually. It’s a pretty solid source.

[Anonymous 18]

Every ‘holiday season’ ’tis time for Wiki to ask for money.

They do provide an immensely valuable service for quick referencing. I believe its good to donate if one can.

Hell the bus ride to local library will cost more, and you’d be stuck asking a post-wall librarian ‘where can I find more information on HPV, look I was going down on this girl, and she said she had HPV but I saw no polyps/warts, so ummm …. like you know?’

[NerdTunnelerParticipant]

Wikipedia needs the donations to keep ads away. Several companies have tried to buy wikipedia but has remained resolute to be independent. Once it gets to be company owned or ad motivated, the contents would easily become restricted and biased.

It would have a fate similar to fake news or biased reporting. With the extent wikipedia houses vast information, I think its a noteworthy cause to donate. It is much cheaper than purchasing the old style book encyclopedias that is very expensive…

I stand with feet apart and let my balls hang free...Manginas dont have balls...See how they stand and sit at the whim of their masters...

[ghostParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Also I don’t know why you classify it as feminist. I use it for tech and to check entertainment or athlete records usually. It’s a pretty solid source.

Same here. I find Wikipedia to be very useful. Anyone can update the records on Wikipedia, provided that the information is factual and cited. You can also challenge the information if you have different facts.

Wikipedia is a solid website in my opinion.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22557]

Philandry wrote:

As I looked for something there today it was screaming desperately for free money to keep going.

Those at Wikipedia broke the rule of don’t bite the hand which feeds you.

[AttonParticipant]

Meh they just need a s~~~ ton of money.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

I don’t like Wikipedia, too much info for free is bad for me.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[Anonymous 18]

Carnage wrote:

I don’t like Wikipedia, too much info for free is bad for me.

You are messed up dude. You know that. But don’t gloat, I am just nicer around the holidays.

How do you get to be a physician for such a morose man?

Lol, I would love to walk in a gymnasium of a MGTOW meet up, and play ‘point out Carnage’. Also interested in MG-Tower. I might confuse you two.

😛

[MrMeParticipant 651]

Anonymous wrote:

Carnage wrote:

I don’t like Wikipedia, too much info for free is bad for me.

You are messed up dude. You know that. But don’t gloat, I am just nicer around the holidays.

How do you get to be a physician for such a morose man?

I agree, this guy doesn’t seem to fit the medical profile at all.

[PhilandryParticipant 538]

Wikipedia was often complained about in the early days for articles being trashed or modified because they did not fit the left wing narrative.
Just to be fair I went back and checked a few hot topics, and must admit they seem to have changed their ways somewhat.

Pardon my lack of current research, very amateur.

They might still be leaking though, as any source of popular information is ripe to be bent to the leftist cause.

Being a man is incredible good luck. Do not waste it on the unlucky.

[Anonymous 14]

I think it’s s~~~. They removed the 9/11 Dancing Jews page, changed the definition of Semite awhile back, and push the Russian interference narrative as if it were fact. There are armies of paid people working hard to manipulate that site into Leftist / Hide S~~~ agenda 24/7. Spend some time snooping around to find out what kind of wars have gone on on some of these topics, do it long enough and you will feel violated even clicking on that site in the future.

[MonkParticipant 17027]

The weird thing about Wikipedia is that it doesn’t like original research.

To post anything genuinely new, you have to first host it somewhere else, then link to it. Only then does it becomes ‘real’.

[MonkParticipant 17027]

Anonymous wrote:

There are armies of paid people working hard to manipulate that site into Leftist / Hide S~~~ agenda 24/7. Spend some time snooping around to find out what kind of wars have gone on on some of these topics …

Myself and a few others actually experimented with this, and saw edits and re-edits removed within minutes.

Some entries definately have watchers.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

MrMe wrote:

Numerator wrote:

Carnage wrote:

I don’t like Wikipedia, too much info for free is bad for me.

You are messed up dude. You know that. But don’t gloat, I am just nicer around the holidays.

How do you get to be a physician for such a morose man?

I agree, this guy doesn’t seem to fit the medical profile at all.

Ohhh I wasn’t like this, but I learned.

I used to care about the people, the family, the society, the patients, and I got s~~~ on.

Now I do my job, I’m a diligent doctor, but is for me, I treat you and heal you and tell you what to do to be healthy, if you do good for me (less taxes to pay medical stuff, more working people, better for economy)

If you don’t, better for me (I earn more money out of you).

Im not a bad doctor just a NFG person, I treat you with the intended to heal you, to keep my reputation as a Med up. I have no plans to abuse you, becouse at the end it will come out and I wold get screwed, but is all about ME.

If being a doctor wasn’t my job I wold not give a f~~~ about anyone health, IS NOT MY F~~~ING PROBLEM.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[ghostParticipant]

Carnage wrote:

I treat you and heal you and tell you what to do to be healthy

Say what you want about him, but he is a damn good doctor. No question about it. I would gladly let him treat me if I ever needed medical care.

[Anonymous 18]

Carnage wrote:

If being a doctor wasn’t my job I wold not give a f~~~ about anyone health, IS NOT MY F~~~ING PROBLEM.

Carnage – much respect to you brother.

I am sure you’d have some crazy stories to share. Beers on me if you ever feel like it.

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

Anonymous wrote:

Carnage wrote:

If being a doctor wasn’t my job I wold not give a f~~~ about anyone health, IS NOT MY F~~~ING PROBLEM.

Carnage – much respect to you brother.

I am sure you’d have some crazy stories to share. Beers on me if you ever feel like it.

I don’t drink but I wold accept a tea.

👍

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Philandry wrote:

Like every feminist structure, it seems Wikipedia is suffering the consequences.

This is clearly bulls~~~ that belongs in the trash.

Now when it comes to feminism and wikipedia it really is nothing special on the site (it tends to be in the range of average).

Philandry wrote:

As I looked for something there today it was screaming desperately for free money to keep going.

Wikipedia has been relying on donations since the beginning of the website and at the end of every year they have their donation drive.

Wikipedia has been asking for money for over 10 years now and it is nothing new (ever since the beginning of when i started going online (over 10 years ago now) wikipedia still had their thing.

Philandry wrote:

Further proof that womyns destroy everything they touch.

By what evidence have women control of wikipedia outside of what anyone could post?

Anonymous wrote:

I think it’s s~~~. They removed the 9/11 Dancing Jews page, changed the definition of Semite awhile back, and push the Russian interference narrative as if it were fact. There are armies of paid people working hard to manipulate that site into Leftist / Hide S~~~ agenda 24/7. Spend some time snooping around to find out what kind of wars have gone on on some of these topics, do it long enough and you will feel violated even clicking on that site in the future.

Anyone can contribute to wikipedia thereby s~~~ will happen and that is outside of the owners being liberal.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Author]

Posts