Wife kills husband and jury finds her not guilty of murder!

[bomwaParticipant 488]

I’ve been following this case in the news. The woman bludgeoned her husband to death with a hammer. She then claimed that her husband had her in an abusive relationship for years. She said she felt trapped.

There was no evidence other than her word. And the 17year old girl, that they were in a threeway relationship with, gave evidence that the wife was happy with their arrangement. As far as I can tell, the only evidence that the wife was being abused was her word…

The husband may well have abused her. But I thought that planning to smash someone’s head in with a hammer was the definition of murder! How in the hell can a jury refuse to find her guilty of murder?

She is a DOCTOR! This means that she knows a lethal blow compared to a non-lethal blow. Manslaughter implies that you killed someone but did not intend to kill them. So you intended to hurt them, but accidentally killed them. But how can this be the case with a doctor who has intimate knowledge of what kind of damage leads to death?

http://www.perthnow.com.au/news/western-australia/geraldton-doctor-found-guilty-of-husbands-manslaughter/news-story/41fcd328fcd70a2950793a7e7c4c8908

A GERALDTON doctor has been sentenced to four years in prison for the manslaughter of her husband — but could be released by midyear.

Chamari Liyanage, 35, received the jail term on Monday for the manslaughter of her husband and fellow doctor Dinendra Athukorala in June 2014.

A Supreme Court jury acquitted Liyanage of murder on Monday afternoon.

She will be eligible for parole after serving two years.

After already serving 18 months, Liyanage could be released in four months.

Nine News reported Liyanage broke down minutes after the verdict was handed down.

In 2014, Dr Athukorala’s body was found at the couple’s Geraldton home covered in blood next to a hammer.

Over the course of the three-week trial, the jury heard Liyanage was a battered woman who had suffered years of sexual, physical and emotional abuse at her husband’s hands.

The jury was told Liyanage was forced to perform sexual acts which her husband filmed and broadcast online.

It was also told Dr Athukorala threatened to kill his wife and members of her family if she attempted to leave or take her own life.

The court also heard the couple engaged in a three-way relationship with a 17-year-old girl.

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

holy s~~~!! i’m guessing the jury is half women half men. all women voted her to be innocent. All it takes is one white knight to vote in favor of women.

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[Anonymous 42]

Wife kills husband

Isn’t that what’s supposed to happen when you get married???
Personally I’d take the hammer implant over a slow 20 or 30 year death! Yea, CRACK, no more s~~~….

[experiencedParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Wife kills husband

Isn’t that what’s supposed to happen when you get married???
Personally I’d take the hammer implant over a slow 20 or 30 year death! Yea, CRACK, no more s~~~….

YES. PRECISELY. TIME LAPSE, BUT PRECISELY!!

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

‘Til death did they part.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

This has crossed the line.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

Female privilege at the works.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Doctor … abuse .. 3 way … pussy … hammer …. death…. male.

When I input these words in the justice computer .. it pings up INNOCENT.

The computer can’t be wrong … can it? .. unless … no … a women did the coding.

[SpacemonkeyParticipant 1481]

Does the following sentence seem odd to anyone?

“In sentencing Liyanage, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Hall said he accepted Liyanage’s amnesia of the killing was genuine and that she acted to protect the 17-year-old girl”

If she had amnesia then how could she say she had been acting to defend the girl? Either she remembers the killing or she does not, she cannot say she does not remember killing her husband and at the same time say that she remembers why she killed him. It just doesn’t make sense.

Another thing that doesn’t make any sense is the penalty. The judge said:

“Any penalty I impose must act as an indicator to others that human life is sacred and cannot be taken even in the most deserving, apparently, of circumstances.”

Presumably he thinks 4 years with parole in 2 is a tough penalty and will act as a deterrent to others. Hell, I know people who have got more time than that for non violent offenses.

But hey, none of it makes much sense.

“Long is the way and hard, that out of Hell leads up to light.”

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

As usual, pussy pass in action.

[SilentParticipant 303]

This isn’t even surprising. One more reason not to get married!

[Author]

Posts