Why would women go to worthless majors if they have this going for them?

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

I just saw this chart in a book I read recently. It basically shows that there are more men with less iq than women in the low end of the chart and then they show that men have higher iq than women in the high end of the chart. It even shows that there are more women with average iq then men.

According to this link, it describes the differences between males and females with STEM degrees: link.

A quote from the article:

Overview of the study
Women represent the majority of young university graduates, but are still underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, mathematics and computer science (STEM) fields. This article provides more information on women with STEM university degrees, and examines whether mathematical ability in high school is related to gender differences in STEM university programs.

According to the National Household Survey (NHS), women accounted for 39% of university graduates aged 25 to 34 with a STEM degree in 2011, compared with 66% of university graduates in non-STEM programs.

Among STEM graduates aged 25 to 34, women accounted for 59% of those in science and technology programs, but accounted for 23% of those who graduated from engineering and 30% of those who graduated from mathematics and computer science programs.

Men aged 25 to 34 with STEM degrees, who are more concentrated in engineering, had lower unemployment rates, higher wages and a lower rate of job mismatch than their non-STEM counterparts. The labour market outcomes of women with STEM degrees, who are more concentrated in science and technology, did not clearly differ from non-STEM women in this age group.

Students who chose a STEM university program had higher PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) mathematics scores at age 15, higher mathematics marks in high school, and had a more positive perception of their mathematical ability than those who opted for other fields of study.

Women are always less likely to choose a STEM program, regardless of mathematical ability. Among those who went to university, 23% women in the three highest categories of PISA scores (out of six) chose a STEM program, compared with 39% of men in the three lowest categories of PISA scores.

In this article, it says this: link

In fall 2015, some 20.2 million students are expected to attend American colleges and universities, constituting an increase of about 4.9 million since fall 2000 (source).

Females are expected to account for the majority of college students: about 11.5 million females will attend in fall 2015, compared with 8.7 million males. Also, more students are expected to attend full time than part time (an estimated 12.6 million, compared with about 7.6 million) (source).

So this article says that there is a higher percentage of females than males enrolling in college. Yet, according to the other article, men are going into the more harder majors (STEM – science, technology, engineering, math) than the females.

I know that I wrote another post before of this, but I have more articles and a graph to show this time. My point is, if there are more average intelligent females in this world compared to average intelligent guys, why do these girls still get into post secondary education in a major where they will not make that much more money per hour to pay of their student loans at least? Instead, they choose an easier major like psychology, and one way that they can make a lot of money with a psychology degree is if they get a PHD in that subject as well to become a Psychologist. If they wish to get “enlightened” with a bachelor degree in psychology, could’t they just read a lot of books on psychology with an aid of a free library card instead? But I guess that they do not only wish to get a psychology degree to be enlightened only, but because they think that they will be upper class if they get any major at all, but with how expensive major degrees are, is it even worth it?

Is there anyone here who have any insights?

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

“Among STEM graduates aged 25 to 34, women accounted for 59% of those in science and technology programs”

Note how “science and technology” is nice and vague. There’s a lot of fluffy wuffy “not quite science” buried under the “science” moniker like the social “sciences”. And most “technology” courses boil down to learning how to change a light bulb or install flappy bird on your phone. They are not about how to make a better lightbulb or program flappy bird or anything difficult and employable.

but accounted for 23% of those who graduated from engineering and 30% of those who graduated from mathematics and computer science programs.

For all those percentages, I have yet to meet a single female engineering graduate who was any good at it. Most of the male graduates these days are also pretty useless, but the females are consistently worse. I have also yet to meet a single female engineering graduate who was still doing engineering ten years later. Most give it up before five years are out. They go get business degrees at best, but most make a career change to “mommy” and let some man do all the hard work for them.

Feminists can call this sexist all they want, but it’s the straight up truth. And there are only two ways to “fix” it: Women can step up to the plate and give up their female mommy privileges and do the hard work to become real engineers. Or feminists can cripple men’s prospects to make them “equal” with lazy, incompetent women. Guess which they’ll choose.

[NewgroundsParticipant 558]

All you need to do is look at any liberal media outlet when they have a debate about feminism they have some dumb broad who has a degree in gender studies complaining about the fact that there’s not enough women in science, all the while she has a useless degree and she had the choice to go into such fields but didn’t and complains that women should. This paints the view that I love repeating on that women have equal opportunity but don’t want to put in the work and cry for equal outcome. Biology dictates that the vast majority of women aren’t interested in hard labor or science.

|Right Wing Death Squad| Swallowed both Red Pills /pol/MGTOW

[bob__Participant 946]

Feminist propaganda from their remake of Ghostbusters: “Nobody is better at quantum physics than you”. Not one woman was involved in developing quantum physics. It was all done 100 years ago by men while the women were gossiping about their husbands’ dick sizes.

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

sidecar wrote:

“Among STEM graduates aged 25 to 34, women accounted for 59% of those in science and technology programs”

Note how “science and technology” is nice and vague. There’s a lot of fluffy wuffy “not quite science” buried under the “science” moniker like the social “sciences”. And most “technology” courses boil down to learning how to change a light bulb or install flappy bird on your phone. They are not about how to make a better lightbulb or program flappy bird or anything difficult and employable.

I agree, a lot of girls end up going into science because they wish to go to healthcare so that they can get a better chance to marry a doctor or something like that. Not many girls go to technology like the guys do. Good observation.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Because of status men get the degrees so they can gain an income (being a professor at a university). Women get the degrees to show off that they got the degrees. Most women will get pregnant and take time off then they will never return to it to raise the kid. Once the kids are teens the playing field has changed. more information has come out, and women need training to get back in.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Mister Man SmithParticipant 285]

Women go to worthless majors because all they want is a college degree, they wanna be able to say they have one, no matter what’s it on, they just want one.

So they go to the easiest ones since the point is just to be a college graduate, not to be good at anything useful.

mistermansmithmgtow.blogspot.com

[bob__Participant 946]

Every degree is equal when it comes to government jobs. So if you want to move up quickly just major in women’s studies then get a master’s in feminist theory and then write your PhD dissertation on gender identity politics. Now you can make 6 figures at the DMV making coffee and you even get to call yourself Doctor.

[RealityBitesParticipant 2198]

I don’t know what’s going on in today’s colleges.
When I was in University I double majored in Mathematics and Physics
Women were as scarce as hen’s teeth in Physics – just a tiny handful
In Mathematics in a class of 60 I would typically see around 8-18 women.

The women I knew in Physics except for 2 weren’t very good at it and were
always hanging around the Grad Students to get help with their homework.

The girls in Math were ok, very few of them took applied mathematics (PDEs and ODEs), most concentrated in Abstract Algebra, Graph Theory, a smattering did topology and differential geometry.

The nice thing about being a STEM major is the minimal involvement with liberal nutcases (both Professors and Students). The whack jobs tended to like Women Studies, Sociology, etc.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

why get C’s in Chemistry when I can get A’s in women’s studies?

Notice at the high IQ end of that graph. That is the Black Swans or Fat Tails. That is your IQ >125, autistic, range. Those are the men that create the future.

Some have said only the ugly girls go into hard sciences, because they won’t be a ble to trap a man.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Author]

Posts