Why MGTOW is the only sane solution?

Topic by Eric Lauder

Eric Lauder

Home Forums Philosophy Why MGTOW is the only sane solution?

Tagged: 

This topic contains 2 replies, has 3 voices, and was last updated by Keymaster  Keymaster 5 years, 2 months ago.

Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #7122
    +1
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    84

    Why MGTOW is the only sane solution?
    I think that MGTOW is the only sane answer to the actual situation of MEN in all the world (especially in western world, but also in India, and in Japan, and in many other countries – NONE will be immune in the long run, NOR EVEN Saudi Arabia!).
    Married MEN are nowadays costantly psychologically and financially abused by their wifes.
    Boys are costantly harassed by the female-oriented policies within female-dominated schools, and none care of their rights.
    All males are costantly despised as “disposable” by the feminists. The feminist mantra is “we don’t need a man”.
    I can even try to agree: maybe a woman don’t need a man. But I’m not sure: many women seems to me so childish, so whiners……
    But I’M SURE that a MAN is far beyond that: a woman is an heavy burden for a MAN!
    Laws regarding marriage (and more and more, even cohabitees) are absolutely unfair, absolutely unbalanced. And the situation is worsening: in UK is coming a law that will outlaw almost every negative thought of a MAN against his wife. Of course that doesn’t apply when the wife psychologically and economically abuse of her husband: that is see as a right for a wife. Sooner or later similar laws will hit other countries.
    Wifes have rights, husbands have duties. That’s how the world works today.
    Marriage is slavery for a MAN.
    Cohabitee is more or less compared to marriage by the various laws – in some countries situation is a little better, in some countries a little worse, but there aren’t great differences.
    New laws are putting in rights and duties even in relationships without cohabitation. Rights for the females, duties for the males, of course….
    That’s why I’m a MGTOW.
    We don’t need to pretend to be strong, invincible: we are human beings, with our weaknesses: MEN have a stronger sexual desire than females, and also MEN have a natural istinct to protect females. These are our weaknesses. These biological weaknesses are used by females to exploit MEN. But when a MAN recognize and admit his weaknesses, females lost all their power.
    We are not animals, as many feminists say, we are human beings, IN MANY WAYS superior to females.
    We can rid out our weaknesses.
    We can break down who hates us WITHOUT REASONS.
    When a female try to change the nature of a MAN, when a female try to exploit him, that IS HATE against MEN, against male nature!!! It doesn’t seems real hate? Oh, well…females cannot express their hate in a different way, in MANLY way, just only because they are females: cowards, weak, whiners.
    We need to solidarize each other, and expand. United we will win, divided we will fall.
    Admitting to be even weak is a great sign of strenght.
    Just only a real MAN have the courage of admit it.
    Just only a real MAN have the strenght to face the truth.
    Just only a real MAN can be a MGTOW.

    #7123
    +4
    JollyMisanthrope
    JollyMisanthrope
    Participant
    3356

    Marriage offers no advantage to a man, and that’s the crux of the situation.

    Though for a MGTOW there may be no ideal situation when it comes to long term relationships and child rearing, things could be made more bearable.

    • Absolutely no alimony in any shape or form and no laws against keeping finances completely separate during the length of the relationship.
    • No requirement to enter into an agreement with the state. No state involvement whatsoever.
    • No laws about co-habitation that say after “x” months you qualify for the same legal status as a married couple.
    • Child support only until the age of 18 and only to provide the basic necessities. Based on what a kid actually needs and not what a father can “afford”
    • No lawyers or judges deciding any kind of settlement.

    A reasonable scenario would consist of two people not legally bound in any financial manner, under any circumstances, raising a child. You remove the conditions that would give a woman a self-serving motivation to enter into a marriage contract and see who is left that actually wants to put in the work and truly be “equal”. A “divorce” essentially being the two people deciding not to live together or be romantically involved yet still having equal access to their children, unless of course a child is put at risk by being under the supervision of one or both of the parents.

    As simple as “this isn’t working out and I don’t want to be involved with you anymore yet we should still raise our child in a responsible and loving manner”.

    Probably wishful thinking but unless the above were possible, fuuuuuuuck getting married.

    The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.
    #7231
    +2
    Keymaster
    Keymaster
    Keymaster

    @Chaos

    If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
Viewing 3 posts - 1 through 3 (of 3 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.