Why do I even bother…

[griffinParticipant 189]

Reading articles like this:

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/new-brunswick/lauren-wiggins-moncton-teen-takes-stand-against-unjust-school-dress-code-1.3071203

 

Yet another feminazi in training…the comments section th0ugh as always just iterates more bulls~~~ against men/boys…like this is again somehow OUR fault. I swear peoples reading comprehension these days is atrocious.

In said article miss Wiggins claims “rape culture” by not being able to wear a rather normal looking summer dress to school. Admittedly this statement confused me as I thought perhaps wearing something more provocative, and being chastised for it, would fit more with the feminist logic that is rape culture…anyway, i was so perplexed i had to go look up rape culture on wiki to see if i had, in fact, understood the definition. Needless to say that little adventure just confused me even more. I should know better by now that to make any attempt to understand wimminz logic!

Now, no where in the article is there any DIRECT statement by any “boys” that they find what she’s wearing “distracting”. And yet, here we find in the comments everyone suddenly blaming boys for being “distracted”, and then vilifying the boys..f~~~ing unreal! So rather than address the School’s dress code and the faculty that enforces it, this article and comments quickly degrade into blaming men/boys….f~~~ me.

Personally I don’t see an issue with the dress…not sure why in this day and age she’d be told NOT to wear something like that, but again, that’s a school dress code thing…and nothing to do with boys being distracted….oh well….feminist logic strikes again, all the more reason MGTOW.

 

[– Deleted on Request –Spectator 936]

She impresses me as a self-entitled princess who got anything and everything she wanted when she wanted it.  Having to comply with rules that she wasn’t accustomed to was probably a  form of aggression against her delicate self.  On the other hand, if she thinks she has it rough now, wait until she has to work for a living.  Oh, I forgot–she won’t have to, will she?

 

Idiots like her and the support they got from administrators were two of the reasons I quit teaching at a certain post-secondary institution.

 

[RennieParticipant]

Just another t~~~ who thinks the rules shouldn’t apply to her.

I remember back in high school they frequently violated the dress code, showing up in sloppy, trashy, random, mismatched clothing. One of them even had swastikas on the bottom of her boots, which didn’t escape the vigilant eye of the vice principal. Another had a shirt with a porthole over their boobs that was clearly intended to draw attention to that area.

Even when they’re forced to wear uniforms they manage to find ways to violate the dress code with them as well. I’m looking at you catholic school system >.> and your female students who may as well be prostitutes with the way they dress.

 

[– Deleted on Request –Spectator 936]

Rennie:

 

I’m sure that stuff like this didn’t happen as often before the educational doctrine of “student as customer”.  After that became popular in the early 1990s, it was pretty much open season on dress codes and rules of conduct.  I had to put up with some weird crap because of that while I was teaching.  Of course, if I complained, there was always an administrator who would defend the student’s right to be crude, vulgar, and generally obtuse.

 

[RoyDalParticipant]

Ignore them. Maybe they’ll go away.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[experiencedParticipant]

Let’s see. Body piercing. Tattoo. And they won’t photo the cut of the front of the dress. Why do I even bother…

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[BurgundyParticipant 1525]

Just another feminist logic moment.

They simply assume or conjure something to make it their argument, as pointed out from the comments going berserk on boys, when it had nothing to do with the boys, they truly are bat s~~~ crazy, conjure whatever to be angry about something.

[Mango IngawayParticipant 2264]

Burgundy wrote:

Just another feminist logic moment. They simply assume or conjure something to make it their argument, as pointed out from the comments going berserk on boys, when it had nothing to do with the boys, they truly are bat s~~~ crazy, conjure whatever to be angry about something.

LMAO, someone’s gotta blame guys, patriarchy, right?

It is a common failing of childhood to think that if one makes a hero out of a demon the demon will be satisfied.

[XSDBSParticipant 3598]

“She wore it to a job interview and got hired.”

The summer dress or the nose ring?

Any guesses/speculation on what kind of job it is?

 

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I don’t bother. I go my own way. Let the crazy’s be crazy. And they’re all crazy.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Author]

Posts