Why Black Men Spearhead MGTOW

[Puffin StuffParticipant 25021]

Of course black men are the spearhead of the MGTOW community. They were kicked out of their homes by the federal government so their wives and children could receive welfare in the 1960’s at a time when the black divorce rate was in single digits.

We all here about the current single mother rate in black community as over 70%. This is blamed directly on black men for not “manning” up and raising their families. In researching this post I found that black web sites devoted to this kind of stuff ignore history and focus on the fact that more black men marry white women.

IMO, you know why? With all their extra income from not having to support black women they can move up to white women. Of course it’s always framed as black men being racist against their own kind…ridiculous.

What a bunch of bulls~~~. I was alive in the 1960’s and my family was very aware as we owned apartment buildings in black communities. We depended on the rent so had some insight into what was happening in the families.

Here is the best article I could find that jives with my first hand experience of what drove black men from the black family. It was concerned white women and the tool they used was Welfare.

“Of course women do not get pregnant just to get welfare benefits…. But, by removing the economic consequences of out-of-wedlock birth, welfare has removed a major incentive to avoid such pregnancies. A teenager looking around at her friends and neighbors is liable to see several who have given birth out-of- wedlock. When she sees that they have suffered few visible consequences … she is less inclined to modify her own behavior to prevent pregnancy…. Current welfare policies seem to be designed with an appalling lack of concern for their impact on out-of-wedlock births. Indeed, Medicaid programs in 11 states actually provide infertility treatments to single women on welfare.”

The marriage penalties that are embedded in welfare programs can be particularly severe if a woman on public assistance weds a man who is employed in a low-paying job. As a FamilyScholars.org report puts it: “When a couple’s income nears the limits prescribed by Medicaid, a few extra dollars in income cause thousands of dollars in benefits to be lost. What all of this means is that the two most important routes out of poverty—marriage and work—are heavily taxed under the current U.S. system.”[3]

The aforementioned FamilyScholars.org report adds that “such a system encourages surreptitious cohabitation,” where “many low-income parents will cohabit without reporting it to the government so that their benefits won’t be cut.” These couples “avoid marriage because marriage would result in a substantial loss of income for the family.”

http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/viewSubCategory.asp?id=1672

The feminists are already rewriting this history so future generations will not know the truth, here’s a recent Atlantic propaganda piece:

AFDC was never flawless—it excluded black women until the 1960s—but it did become an important lifeline for poor mothers throughout the 1980s. By 1992, the majority of AFDC recipients were single mothers, rather than widows.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2014/05/how-welfare-reform-left-single-moms-behind/361964/

Cleverly avoiding what created the “single mothers in the 1980’s when there were practically none just 20 years before.

In the 1980’s I help birth 20 babies to 20 women at a city hospital. All of the girls were under 16 and there was no anesthetic so we were expected to stay the whole 24 hour pregnancy.

So, I had a lot of time to talk to the girls about their plans for themselves and their babies. Each and every girl told the same story as above. With a baby they get welfare benefits and in their community that makes them “adult” women. They didn’t think the baby would hinder their aspirations because their 35 year old mother, who was never present at the birth, ever, would take care of the child.

Having been there and done that it was clear to us at the time that welfare was forcing women to divorce in order to qualify for public assistance. An avalanche of divorce occurred.

Is it any different now? Well now black women have to work leaving their children unattended and potential gang meat.

Good job Feminists. Now your doing a great job on the white population starting with little you go girls and completing in our college hate factories.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 25021]

btw: Our illiberal leaders under progressive deluxe the mayor of NY, DeBlasio wants day care expanded dramatically. I suppose the 67% working woman rate is not high enough.

He wants government child care to start at 6 weeks which is the current law:

The Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) provides free or low cost child care to eligible families living in New York City. Child Care is available for children ages 6 weeks through 12 years, while children with special needs can receive care through age 18. Child care is typically provided at ACS-funded child care centers and registered family child care homes.

http://www.dccnyinc.org/view/page/subsidized_child_care_

Hahahahahah, we are MGTOW, not our problem…nice job feminism!

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[taliensinParticipant 30]

“Having been there and done that it was clear to us at the time that welfare was forcing women to divorce in order to qualify for public assistance. An avalanche of divorce occurred.”

so what you have here is women marrying the state because they get more, its amazing and it answers one question i had about single mothers in america, specifically how can they manage to STAY single with all the voluntary slaves willing to pay for someone elses child, sugar daddy state pays more.

This is also why otherwise perfectly sane women who say they want to have nothing to do with feminism vote feminist every chance they get, SHINY STUFF for free (ie,men pay for them)

[Anonymous 42]

Thanks HR.Puff, good point. From what I’ve gathered in my life’s journey is that feminism has replaced the man in the family unit with government overreach, We have become a destructive nation unto it’s self (thanks feminism). All that I see in economic growth is the ever expanding state.

Funded by printed dollars and IOU’s, the state has collectively convoluted the purpose and intentions of the dollar. By ever expanding the government to repair the damage done (by the government) we see a black-hole, an event-horizon on the horizon, we are imperatively headed to utter socialistic destruction. A gauntlet of laws to ensnare men to assist in their own misery and destruction continues to utterly fail. The only direction this government has to offer is to increase the funding to solve the problems. This delusion has lead to the ballooning debt and a lower credit rating for this country. Our once prosperous nation is now apparently dieing.

With the primary target being the prosperous man, this has ruined the entrepreneurial spirit that delivered this nation to greatness… MGTOW is the only alternative to survive the utter destruction mandated by the endless laws of feminism that now inundate the federal government, and her adopted children being the 50 states.

Our society has been principally overturned to a collective feminist mindset. The forgathers viewed the common man as independent and unalienable to his natural rights, the states were viewed as the primary overseers of government, the enumerated powers within the federal charter were considered as restrictions from the federal government becoming all to powerful.

The exact opposite has transpired under the feminist agenda. The federal government has intruded into every aspect of the common man’s life, delivering misery and enslavement to both men and women, and utterly destroying the value of children, only to raise them to be a destructive force against the common good.

MGTOW is the only logical answer to avert the enslavement and perpetuate the feminist course to destruction.

Resolve has no blueprint, it can’t be tamed, it’s like the endless flow of a river dammed, it will, without question, over top and destroy the dam, or find a new path to a different watershed, thereby eroding a new river bed, rendering the once mighty dam obsolete and useless…..

[AlbertParticipant 646]

Anonymous wrote:

From what I’ve gathered in my life’s journey is that feminism has replaced the man in the family unit with government overreach, We have become a destructive nation unto it’s self (thanks feminism)

Wow. Awesome post MG-Tower. The quality of the writing and wisdom on this site continues to blow me away.

E=MC² Bitch

[Anonymous 42]

Thanks Albert, I speak from the heart, from all that I’ve seen…. A broken heart, yes. A broken spirit, HELL F~~~ING NO!

[Mann FugaSpectator 77]

Welfare for women has been the norm for centuries.  The idea that men oppressed women is preposterous.  Men are shamed in every stage of their lives to live on bended knee for women.  By force of law, men’s natural power has been srtipped and redistributed to women; hence the male only draft and selective service.  Men are wholly blind to their own destruction and subjugation by not only the gynocracy – but also by the patriarchy.

Such misandric tripe has been put upon men since the beginning of time.  Why do you think knights and heroes are made such a fuss of?  I’ll tell you why.  It keeps men in their ignorant, naive, vagina worshiping places.  When men get out of line – the shaming intensifies.  That’s why MGTOW are so hated.  We’re immune to the shaming – not only by feminists, but by the white knights, captain save a hos, manginas and most especially, the patriarchy.

Now that working is glamorous, less laborious, less life threatening, more financially rewarding and gynocentric, women want men out of their way.  Women want the most prestigious, most powerful, most lucrative positions for themselves.  In the same breath – they demand marrying men of better education and financial status.  What does this mean?  It means that women are the worst of hypocrites, deeply sociopathic and the most deserving of early death.  Women are greedy, narcissistic, entitled and the biggest detriment to life as we know it.  There is no comparison to women’s hubris.  For that, they will pay – but not by my hand.  Give women enough rope and they’ll hang themselves.  That’s the best part.

The gynocracy and patriarchy work hand in hand to transfer power and wealth from the majority of men to the gynocracy and patriarchy.  The vast majority of men are not members of the patriarchy.  Get it?

[Author]

Posts