Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › What's with anti-SJWs saying that women having sex with minor boys is fine?
This topic contains 22 replies, has 17 voices, and was last updated by
Bee 3 years, 7 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
I’ve been seeing guys like Gavin McInnes and various people on /pol/ saying that women should be given a break when it comes to sexual acts with minors because men and women are different. But is that their dicks talking instead of their brains? Are they cucking themselves?
Watch Bar Bar’s video, then tell me your opinions, guys.
Between adults and children there exists a real opportunity for exploitation.
A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!
If men and women are different, then they shouldn’t be treated as equals.
One or the other you f~~~heads, you can’t have both.
To see what is in front of one's nose requires a constant struggle. -Orwell
In my opinion, sex with minors is just wrong.
It’s not ok for women to have sex with minor boys.Well, despite his antifeminism, Gavin is still a Tradcon. He still allows women the pussy pass like most of the others, so its to be expected. I like his videos in general, but a sex crime is a sex crime, regardless of who it is perpetrated by.
“Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard
I don’t give a solid rat f~~~ what the /Poltards/ say!
Sex with a minor is wrong regardless if the perpetrator is male or female.Equality.
Man bangs a 15 year girl / boy old gets rape charge and 5-20 years. T~~~s wanted equality. Here it is.
Woman bangs a 15 year old boy / girl gets rape charge and 5-20 years.
ANYTHING ELSE is straight up pussy pass different set of standards. That s~~~ airplane will not fly. Mangina’s and White Knights supporting that s~~~ need to have their man card revoked along with their ability to hold office or vote.
It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.
It’s not alright for minor age boys to have sex with of age women.
These boys are out of control and should be charged with rape when they become adults.
Also should the victim get pregnant the offender will pay child support when he gets a job … in prison.
Think that sounds nuts?
IT’S ALREADY HAPPENED ….
If men and women are different, then they shouldn’t be treated as equals.
One or the other you f~~~heads, you can’t have both.
They shouldn’t be treated as equals. But in this way? This gives more lead way for women to manipulate boys and their parents for child support, or could lead to false sexual assault/rape charges. Either way, boys still can get f~~~ed over.
Funny how I mention these types of things and no one has still given me a reason why this wouldn’t happen.

Anonymous11Why would a 16 year boy old not use his free pass to bang 16/17 year old girls versus some washed out 37 year old mentally ill sea hag? I know they are just thinking with their dicks.
Even when I was young, I was never attracted to women even a wee bit older than me even when they were pre-Wall and still looking great. I don’t know, but it just being plain wrong is a good place to start.
What’s with them, you ask? It’s because anti-SJWs/anti-feminists are still gynocentric and passive feminists a lot of the time. They still worship women and think that we guys should be able to control ourselves and women shouldn’t face any kind of justice in this area.
What I live again said. ..
The system is already broken.
Rape is Rape.
Two sets of laws though. .total B.S.Women are already treated better than men in regards to sexual crimes, imagine how many men falsely accused of rape are sitting in prison cells as we type on this forum. That doesn’t happen to women.
If we listen to a female at all, It's no longer to find out if they're crazy, we know they're crazy, It's to find out what flavor.
I’ve been seeing guys like Gavin McInnes and various people on /pol/ saying that women should be given a break when it comes to sexual acts with minors because men and women are different. But is that their dicks talking instead of their brains? Are they cucking themselves?
Watch Bar Bar’s video, then tell me your opinions, guys.
<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/AeQ0iPO_h5A?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>
I have my own probably very not PC view developed through observation of history and behavior. It’s also based on what I suspect is a scam is being run by older females trying to cut down competition for good husbands with younger more fertile, and attractive women.
Only in recent history with women getting the vote have we gone nuts about the minor thing. Don’t get me wrong, I’m specifically speaking of ages around 14-18 and no younger you damn pervs. There are reasons why “sweet sixteen” and “Quincieneras” (15 yo b-day parties) were held. Because families agreed that the girl was mature enough for marriage/aka monogomous sex. Not village whore sex.
Suitors weren’t always the same age. In fact, women always harp about how they mature faster. They are basically inferring that older men were as mature as a female of a younger age. Applying female logic it makes LESS sense for an older female to have relationships with younger men. Applying that female logic it would make more sense for older men to date younger females.
But let’s be honest, if we were high school students around 14-18, we would have no problem nutting in a hot teacher if no one told us otherwise. It isn’t that we are victims, it is we don’t understand the risk that that woman is going to make us their providers if we have a child or bone us with her hypergamy. A predicament that would generally be acceptable to most “victims” if we were ABLE to find jobs at that age that could provide for a family.
But we can’t in this society, we can’t “become men” till we pass an age where legally we can begin to rake in a lot of money through an employer.
The rage against minor females also likely stems from females loosing out on men in the provider pool to younger women. I’ll be frank with you, if my daughter at 15 found a rich, loyal, man who was 10 years her elder who was dumb enough to get married because he was some hopeless sap looking for a virgin wife to have one of those happliy ever after marriages, I would be f~~~ing happy and told my daughter don’t go screwing around because she just won the lottery.
Only in recent history with women getting the vote have we gone nuts about the minor thing. Don’t get me wrong, I’m specifically speaking of ages around 14-18 and no younger you damn pervs. There are reasons why “sweet sixteen” and “Quincieneras” (15 yo b-day parties) were held. Because families agreed that the girl was mature enough for marriage/aka monogomous sex. Not village whore sex.
I think 14 is a little low and anything below that is bordering on pedo and icky. 15/16 is a fine minimum.
The government has decreed which age you’re allowed to shag and with who you want. Immoral? Probably. Illegal? No.
If you want to shag a hag at that point, then that’s your decision.
Like you said older women are trying to block out the younger competition, instead of just accepting that they’ve been replaced by newer models and that time has passed them by.
What I find even more baffling is that even men who are in their teens (below 18 years of age) can and do get charged with rape and have to register as a sex offender in some cases. FOR HAVING SEX WITH SOMEONE THEIR OWN AGE!
How f~~~ed up is that? And people wonder why I say let society burn. F~~~ this gay earth.
Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.
What I find even more baffling is that even men who are in their teens (below 18 years of age) can and do get charged with rape and have to register as a sex offender in some cases. FOR HAVING SEX WITH SOMEONE THEIR OWN AGE!
How f~~~ed up is that? And people wonder why I say let society burn. F~~~ this gay earth.
The floating age laws have been tried, but they apparently complicate the legal process and that is why they aren’t widely used.
Only in recent history with women getting the vote have we gone nuts about the minor thing. Don’t get me wrong, I’m specifically speaking of ages around 14-18 and no younger you damn pervs. There are reasons why “sweet sixteen” and “Quincieneras” (15 yo b-day parties) were held. Because families agreed that the girl was mature enough for marriage/aka monogomous sex. Not village whore sex.
I think 14 is a little low and anything below that is bordering on pedo and icky. 15/16 is a fine minimum.
The government has decreed which age you’re allowed to shag and with who you want. Immoral? Probably. Illegal? No.
If you want to shag a hag at that point, then that’s your decision.
Like you said older women are trying to block out the younger competition, instead of just accepting that they’ve been replaced by newer models and that time has passed them by.
Don’t look at me, I didn’t make boys or girls biologically geared to have sex and children at that age. You need to keep in mind, the body is programmed by DNA, and our social norms can either acknowledge it or through particular social reasoning work around it or avoid it. While some women may seem to childish at 14, there are others that can be mistaken for 18 because either growth hormones or individual genetic make up. We have all seen variations of development during the teenage years.
I posted a video not to long ago about some asshole attacking a dude’s 16 year old son with a Trump hat thinking he was older because him and his dad likely bodybuilders.
Don’t look at me, I didn’t make boys or girls biologically geared to have sex and children at that age. You need to keep in mind, the body is programmed by DNA, and our social norms can either acknowledge it or through particular social reasoning work around it or avoid it.
I’m not saying you’re wrong. You are right and I agree. One time I came across an 18 year old who looked like she was 15. Cute girl, but probably hates men.
Wow so this thread just sparked a memory of mine.
Ok so rape is not funny. However the rape I was involved in is still kinda funny for me.
I must have been around 5 and she was in her teens and at least three times the size of me (not a land whale just older than me).
She got me to come play in her room where she then raped me. I had no clue what was going on I mean hell she could have at least explained to me I needed a boner for this game.
I mean that is rape no matter how you look at it.
If only my maths teacher had done the same when I was a little older I really needed it then damit not when I was 5.
Judge away but for me its just kinda funny
- for me
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
