What would a true patriarchy look like?

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

I was just thinking about this, and a few things came to mind. Gonna be basic and a little advanced, just to show how many rights/privileges (henceforth just written as right), sometimes more rights than men, women have:

– female right of being able to read/write: revoked;
– female right of getting an education: revoked;
– female right of voting: revoked;
– female right of getting a job (ranging from garbage woman to CEO): revoked;
– female right of “boss in own belly” (literaly translated from Dutch) aka reproductive rights: revoked;
– female right of denying a man, any man, of having sex with her: revoked;
– female right of talking back to a man: revoked;
– female right of expression her opinion on anything, anywhere: revoked.

What “rights” would they have?

– stay-at-home mom forever;
– bearing children for as long as she’s fertile;
– cooking and cleaning the house;
– swapping cooking and cleaning ideas with other females, no more than that, maybe on pleasuring men;
– females must follow every man’s whim and be available at all times;

… now tell me we live in an oppressive patriarchy.

And please, do add to these lists, brothers! See if we can come up with one which shows that the world is gynocentric instead of a patriarchy.

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[Anonymous 11]

What they call a patriarchy is damn sure not a patriarchy.

For me, it’s quite simple. Total obedience and loyalty to me in exchange for my resources and loyalty. I would leave decorating to them though subject to my final approval.

[MattNYCParticipant 2329]

Remember that a man enforces all these rights with physical violence.

Interesting that back then, men could beat their wives and it wasn’t a crime (or if it was illegal, it was rarely prosecuted). Now, women strike men (and it’s illegal) and are rarely prosecuted for it.

Patriarchy my ass.

[AFTParticipant 2726]

Patriarchy is the right to bear full responsibility of the consequences of your actions, both positive and negative.

I don’t care if women have rights to vote, be educated or ride the carousel, but I do care that their consequences are continuously shifted to men, either individually through divorce or other gynocratic laws, or socially via the welfare state and their handouts.

Society has been constructed to enable a totally feminine experience of life from childhood (ADSD meds for boys), to young adulthood (feminization of tertiary education) to adulthood (PC, feminization of the workplace, corrupt family laws).

There are no consequences or responsibilities for the s~~~ty choices and actions of all the special snowflake unicorns.

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[Anonymous 42]

AFT wrote:

There are no consequences or responsibilities for the s~~~ty choices and actions of all the special snowflake unicorns.

Great post ATF! The consequences for their actions are arriving slowly but surly, like and ice berg headed for a Coca Cola can…

[Anonymous 25]

A true patriarchy is never possible. Women manipulate men, so it’s always a matriarchy.

Historically all those men just couldn’t wait to die in wars to protect women … because patriarchy matriarchy.

The only way for men to live is mgtow. Inadvertently by refusing to get married and avoiding women, it’s delivering consequences for women. Women say ‘end violence against women and girls’, men say ‘fine go away and leave us alone’. They may not like the response they got, but men will adapt in ever greater numbers.

Welcome to the male enlightenment ladies. Hope you ladies enjoy it as much as we are, but somehow I doubt that.

[VarunParticipant 2981]

Nerevar wrote:

– female right of being able to read/write: revoked;
– female right of getting an education: revoked;
– female right of voting: revoked;
– female right of getting a job (ranging from garbage woman to CEO): revoked;
– female right of “boss in own belly” (literaly translated from Dutch) aka reproductive rights: revoked;
– female right of denying a man, any man, of having sex with her: revoked;
– female right of talking back to a man: revoked;
– female right of expression her opinion on anything, anywhere: revoked.

If that is what a true patriarchy would look like, it’d be inhuman. That’s why it doesn’t exist.

And like Mr. CPIG says:

Anonymous wrote:

Total obedience and loyalty to me in exchange for my resources and loyalty.

if these conditions ^^ look ‘patriarchial’ by any degree as compared to true patriarchy, like the feminists argue, then they are in for quite a bit of shock if a true patriarchial culture really takes over.

A bird in the hand is worth two in the bush.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Q: What would a true patriarchy look like?

A: It would look like the USA in the post-Civil War Era, and Great Britain in the Victorian Era, and Ancient Rome when Augustus was Emperor. That is, it would be expansionist, and protective of its top-performing citizens at the same time.

Nota bene: Today’s feminist dominated world is the opposite (just in case no one has noticed), and this is a bad thing.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

It would look like something write out of the old testament.
Some Conan the barbarian type s~~~.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Anonymous wrote:

For me, it’s quite simple. Total obedience and loyalty to me in exchange for my resources and loyalty. I would leave decorating to them though subject to my final approval.

I agree. Look at the relationship between a 40 year old father and his five year old daughter. That is what patriarchy would look like. She gets to decide which My Little Pony is her favorite and what goes into the EasyBake Oven and he would decide everything else.

[narwhalParticipant]

It’s a very vague term that has more to do with moral authority and leadership then it really does with rights. It doesn’t mean that men must control absolutely everything for it to be a patriarchy. I don’t think you have to exclude women from getting an education or a job in order for it to be a patriarchy.

I don’t think we live in a patriarchy since men do not have any moral authority or leadership over women. It’s not a matriarchy either, since women do not have any moral authority over men. However, there certainly is perceived authority, manipulation, traditional roles, and special rights and privileges reserved for specific genders (and races).

As well, anybody who knows anything about leadership or moral authority understands that it does not mean that the leader gets what he wants, has no concern for the well being of his subjects, or would willing sacrifice his needs and wants for the wants and needs of his subjects. In fact, the most common leadership role is that of a parent, and the most common scenario is the parent putting the needs and wants of a child above their own (although not as common as it used to be).

And lastly, if a patriarchy is so bad, then why is it that those who apparently suffered under patriarchy, women, less and less happy as patriarchy is removed more and more?

Ok. Then do it.

[Author]

Posts