What Will Happen When S~~~ Hits The Fan ? . . . .

[Anonymous 29]

This is a broad question so I will narrow it down to 3 questions only.

1 – How long before MGTOW reaches critical mass and attracts political scrutiny ?

2 – What actions if any do you expect after scrutiny of MGTOW ?

3 – Are you a prepper or thinking about it ?

Gentleman, your thoughts and opinions please.

[Anonymous 12]

1/ Probably closer and closer to reaching critical mass in terms of men just waking up and no longer playing the game as females would like us to. Political Scrutiny? What could they scrutinize really? Men not dating or dating on their own terms, men walking away from women entirely? Men doing their own thing?

2/ Probably some shaming campaign that will attract more men to MGTOW.

3/ Bit of both in some respects.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Who cares … you can’t shame smoke, legislate against the sky or arrest an idea.

They can try all of these … but it will have no grip….. and it may even have the opposite outcome and drive men to mgtow.

That’s it’s beauty.

[UntamedParticipant]

The way the world is going I think they’ll have some things more… tengible to tangle with. If y’all think the world has gone nuts now, just get comfortable and ready to brace yourselves ’cause it’s about to get a whole lot wilder.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[FermatParticipant 3478]

It will not reach critical mass. Since the divorce rate is at nearly 50 percent in the next few decades once it reaches say 60 women and the government will go nuts and try to change social attitudes about marriage to get people to still do it. And mirons who only think witheur dicjs will buy into this. Marriage will soon be like college.  Expensive as hell but people will still want to do because they think they are smarter than everyone else.

I have discovered a truly remarkable list of reasons why women are not necessary for a happy life, but alas this margin is too small to contain it.

[RobinParticipant 17]

Anonymous wrote:

This is a broad question so I will narrow it down to 3 questions only. 1 – How long before MGTOW reaches critical mass and attracts political scrutiny ?

I think MGTOW already has critical mass in the sense that it has its own momentum and is spreading, but in any case it’s just a term to describe something that has always existed in some form or another.  I assume the term was invented because feminisation itself is now dominant, or becoming so, and in response somebody decided to invent a term and acronmyn for what a lot of men already think.

Anonymous wrote:

2 – What actions if any do you expect after scrutiny of MGTOW ?

I expect nothing of substance.  Political and legislative action will be inadequate against a social force such as this, mainly because in ‘democratic’ societies women hold at least 50% of the vote, a fact that politicians and policy-makers cannot ignore, and so any action will be entirely reactive (and probably short-termist, ill-thought and panic-driven) and will, in its effect, be akin to patting fog.  You may see something clever, like a ‘New Feminist’ movement that panders to the tradcons and MRA types.  Probably women will feign anger at feminism and you’ll see a backlash against the militant types, and some of it will be sincere as women will be worried.  Many – probably most – men will fall for the ‘old wine in new bottles’ trick for a while, but all it can do is delay the inevitable.  They can’t stop this – they’re f~~~ed.

Marriage as an institution is already collapsing in the West and has been for around 20-25 years: partly as a result of secular attitudes and partly because men increasingly have become aware that it’s a bad deal.  Men who insist on common law marriages and long-term partnerships as a substitute for marriage aren’t MGTOW: in fact, they’re the opposite, still very much Blue Pill, but they are the soft underbelly, if you like, of broader changes in social attitudes.  For some, these attitudes will harden and they will become MGTOW, and the government can do nothing about this and cannot take any effective preventative action.  MGTOW floats in the air and exists in the aether.  There is no organisation, structure or hierarchy to attack.

Steps can be taken to alleviate the problem – immigration of families, tax incentives for marriage and civil partnership and so on, but these only address the symptoms, they do not tackle the root of the problem.

Anonymous wrote:

  3 – Are you a prepper or thinking about it ? Gentleman, your thoughts and opinions please.

I’m trying to be, yes.  I now grow my own vegetables and I have plans to move off the grid eventually, not because of MGTOW-related issues specifically, but just for the reason that I think it’s generally a sound contingency.

[martygParticipant 103]

1. It’s going to be a gradually increasing process, and it’s already begun. BBC, youtube.

2. Also already started: shaming, attempts at manipulation, linking with racist/terrorist/hate groups. Again, BBC. Soon ABC, CBS, NBC.

3. I’m 60, I’m not going to survive any coming Fempocalypse.

[AttonParticipant]

1.If men actually start grouping together in a substantive way for their benefit. Then political scrutiny is going to be pretty f~~~ing useless and entirely fruitless.
2.Whatever the majority wants which might be limited taxes and or legal reform like no other.
3.I might develop some stuff for that down the line.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 29]

martyg wrote:

I’m 60, I’m not going to survive any coming Fempocalypse.

I’m not far behind you, . . . . 59 this month. We may not live to see a lot but seeing s~~~ hit the fan would be nice  for me before I turn to dust.

[bluenose-redpillParticipant 19]

I think you are under-estimating women. Wait, before you hit the pink button on me, think about it. What we know is that women know how to survive. A blind man knows our society is f~~~ed up and it’ll be the tunas who will fix it. MGTOW is the mirror.

[Jon the Ex-SquidParticipant 298]

1: Inherit limitations are present. The ‘concept’ (I use concept because there isn’t a political organization here) is currently portrayed as anti-feminist, misogynistic, and hate-filled.  As such, given that the general population would take whatever is printed before them at face value, there’s only so far MGTOW can go. Its not socially acceptable.  That said, the concept that men (and women) want to avoid marriage is perfectly feasible and likely to increase over time.  As the majority are unwed, then that becomes the norm and I’d anticipate seeing ‘marriage shaming’ to occur (you’re married? eweeee!).

2: Actions? This isn’t an organized movement with traditional leaders. Its a loose collection of men who are doing their own thing, dealing with society in their own ways.  But what WILL happen is the media will eventually label the movement as a fringe hate group and belittle anyone identifying as MGTOW. At that point, the movement will need to change its name to something like Confirmed Bachelors.  It’ll be all about media shaming, getting the identities of ‘well known MGTOWs’ and initiating a campaign of harassment, and eventually making the title MGTOW synonymous with negative connotations.

3: I am a prepper and have been since I left the military in 2000. I prep for local and regional events, such as Superstorm Sandy, in which transportation networks will be disrupted for a few weeks and there will be no electricity for that period of time.

 

[Author]

Posts