What does a "relationship" mean to you?

[alchemistParticipant 484]

I was just going to make this post a reply to the thread; What the f~~~ is a “serious relationship”. Can we clarify. But I decided to make it a new thread because everyone has their own definition, and I have a story.

So I was speaking with this girl for a few days online, we chatted, we flirted, we acctually had some interesting conversation (like two human beings!).

Things were going well until the below interaction.

Now, you need to know I had already flirted with her and she responded well, we talked about sex openly as well and she didn’t shy away from it. Then I casually flirted with her in a joking way- it was seriously the mildest flirtatious thing I’ve ever said to a girl. (previously I have asked girls if they’d like to be my sex slave or suck my horse c~~~ and I have gotten positive replies!)

just to let you know I’m not here for dating, it says on my profile 🙂

So what are you looking for? and where does it say that? Is that what you meant by the these parts of your profile? “not looking for anything super serious right now.” & ” just looking for people to hang out with and share some experiences with.”

No reply.

I re-read her profile twice and I could see nothing but those two statements about what she wants. Now this is not only confusing because she seemed to react positively to more aggressive flirting, but also because those two statements apply to me as well, and I’m just looking for a casual f~~~ buddy. Yeah- I’m not looking for anything super serious, I’m just looking to share some experiences with you, like the experience of f~~~ing you doggy style.

She didn’t say “no sex”
She didn’t say “friends only”
She expected those things to be conveyed by statements so ambiguous that they apply to someone looking for the exact opposite things.

So what does “a serious relationship” mean to you? What does “a casual relationship” mean to you?

And don’t give me the tired, jaded old stereotypes like “a ball and chain” or “poison” or “a pointless and costly excercise”.
What are the actual boundaries and requirements in your opinion?

[TaxGuyParticipant]

To me, the difference is who else you are dating. A “serious” relationship would be exclusive and a casual relationship means that you at least have “permission” from the other person to date other people. Exclusive vs. non-exclusive.

That and a serious relationship over time means that it’s “going somewhere” where a casual relationship doesn’t have an end goal in mind.

That would be my definition.

Order the good wine

[Anonymous 2]

To me a “relationship” is nothing more but the interaction between two people. Like, how database rows can have a relationship. I have a relationship with literally EVERYBODY I know. The definition of that one word is vague at best. As long as our laws stay as they are, there is no need to cater to women and define a relationship as “serious”.

It’s either “fun” or not worth it. I don’t do “serious” because that’s just femspeak for the plantation.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5126]

In this day and age, what constitutes a relationship is completely nebulous.

Sovereignty above all else.

[XSDBSParticipant 3598]

alchemist wrote:

So I was speaking with this girl for a few days online,

Ugh, from my personal experience, “online” women are looking for attention, not a relationship…

If you want proof, ask her to meet in “real life”.
Her answer (or excuses) will shine light on the truth immediately.

[Anonymous 1]

Slavery

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Clearly, all she wanted was attention, and to tease you and hint at the possibility for sex to string you along.

As far as my idea of a relationship. Well, I first proceed to lay pipe. Then I pay her for; services rendered/ to stfu/ and go away.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Truthseeker82Participant 6406]

In a real equitable world – both parties would bring something valuable to the relationship. One partner would not have undue and special priveleges or rights. But society had other plans – so now why even bother?

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

To relate to a female and vice versa, at minimum, is a precursor to a relation(ship)…as best as I can figure it, from my own experiences spanning almost 3 decades, it’s impossible in our current society and social construct. At least for myself.

Seeing that I cannot, will not, relate to someone that sees me as the enemy, the one to blame, someone to hate/despise, enslave, exploit, use, abuse, and so on, to me is beyond a deal breaker…

There just isn’t even a deal in the first place, let alone a relationship.

My 2 cents.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10922]

Women expect to define the terms of what a relationship is and what constitutes a relationship as well as the definition of love. They do this because they have a vagina and they think it’s their birth-right to. If a man tries to inject his opinion on the matter and it doesn’t match hers….MISOGYNY.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

No matter what women say, they are all looking to get married. The only reason they have casual relationships (f~~~ing) is because they are they think they have time to f~~~ Chads and then find a rich guy later.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

It means live in a “commie” regimen like the one described in 1984.

[ZoidbergParticipant 965]

It meant companionship to me, where two people are better off together than alone. Where you look forward going home to somebody. Where you build each other up, not tear each other down. Where you stick together, creating a little oasis for yourselves in a bats~~~ crazy world.

Then I started swallowing red pills. There is not much left of this fantasy now. To be honest, I am probably as unfit for companionship as the wast majority of women are.

Love, romance, intimacy, sex – there is nothing to be had.

How many delusions can one shed?

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Nazi dictatorship.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[alchemistParticipant 484]

Zoidberg wrote:

Love, romance, intimacy, sex – there is nothing to be had.

How many delusions can one shed?

Keep going, question even that, question even your current premises. Red pills are not always fullstops, if you look further, most are wormholes to deeper dimensions of knowledge- often, about yourself.

Relentless truth.

[TriviumParticipant 1029]

A serious relationship is the process of having one’s walled shoved down one’s throat and then removed through one’s urinary tract using a fishhook coated in Tabasco sauce at the end of a length of barbed wire.

A serious relationship can mean anything to a woman and since relationship means nothing more than being related or interrelated and serious nothing more than consequential you can pretty much wrap anything in those terms.

I.e. Hitler had a serious relationship with the Jews whereas liars have a casual relationship with the truth.

And since woman are infinitely experienced at bending the meaning of words the state of ‘your relationship’ with a women is whatever she decides it to be in order to further her own needs. She is well aware that they’re just meaningless words but she enjoys it when you think otherwise.

"Listen to all, Follow none"

[Faith+1Participant 866]

bigboy83 wrote:

Nazi dictatorship.

The world is so f~~~ed up now I often wonder is that such a bad thing….

[sidecarParticipant 35860]

What relationship?

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

Anonymous wrote:

Slavery

That pretty much sums it up.

From what the OP wrote he might have to learn about women the hard way.

Monk

[BadgerParticipant 2277]

It doesn’t matter what “relationship” means to a man. To a woman it means that she is in total control of the man.

[Author]

Posts