We’re not the only targets

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

My first visit to this part of the forum. Sorry if this post is long.

2015 was a s~~~ year vis-a-vis domestic violence here in Oz, with a lot of children dying. It began with mourning for 8 kids – 7 siblings and a cousin – stabbed to death by their mother in Queensland and this year sadly began much the same way, with a dad killing himself and his 2 sons. He’d been struggling with mental health issues for 3 years and was under severe financial strain as well. The mother has spoken about the devastating loss of both her kids and her husband, and it’s clearly a tragedy, not some vindictive payback or result of a custody dispute etc.

Feminism of course ignored it all. They continued with their narrative that DV was something only men did, and only women suffered. Nothing new there.

Anyways, people are finally starting to ask why no one is questioning what happens to children, despite the recent focus on family violence. Now for a long time feminists have just covered up the reality of female violence against children, but this is the MRA part of the forum so I don’t need to tell you that. But I’ve noticed lately an increased push to redefine ‘DV against children’ as something the child witnesses rather than experiences.

Ie: Child gets bashed by mum – nothing to see here.
Child sees mum get struck by Felonius McFacialtatt – that child is a DV victim! Evil man!

Then a couple of days ago I saw THIS piece of wretched s~~~ at news dot com: a piece that purports to speak about children as the ‘voiceless’ victims of DV, but only lists male perpetrators, including a hatchet job on the poor dad mentioned above. It’s a cunning write – no mention of gender issues whatsoever, just concern for the children and sole mention of men so the casual reader can only draw one conclusion.

Ok, s~~~ biased journalism is nothing new, but I didn’t realise how advanced this was until I did some digging. I came across the group ‘Our Watch‘. This is mentioned as a peak body that “has been established to drive nation-wide change in the culture, behaviours and attitudes that lead to violence against women and children.” WATCH stands for ‘Women And Their CHildren’ – because disenfranchising men completely from their kids is a step towards a better world, right? F~~~ing idiots.

This group is a charity that is government funded (partners with 5 governments, yay!) and claims to represent women and children. But when you start going through their website, you find a number of statistics that show women as victims, but no data on children. From this supposed f~~~ing peak body, NO DATA.

Because the data would, of course, demolish the narrative.

C~~~s!

Tl;dr – c~~~s cover up abuse of children.

[FrankyParticipant 2338]

The system can go round robbing and trowing random men whilst padding itself on the back.As long as men get f~~~ed over there’s nothing wrong and it’s prosperity!There’s really nothing new here and
no amount of common sense
no amount of evidence
and no amount of bargaining
that will even slow down this .
This is why i left MRA it’s unrealistic to think you can stop it in a civil manner.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

When all men walk away … how will they explain kids still being beaten to death?

Probably call it extended abortion.

[martygParticipant 103]

ILiveAgain wrote:

When all men walk away … how will they explain kids still being beaten to death?

Probably call it extended abortion.

Abortion: killing a baby aged 0 – 9 months in utero
Post-Natal Abortion: killing a baby aged 0 to 60 years
Euthanasia: killing a baby greater than 60 years old.

[Author]

Posts