We're a birth defect, according to this mangina…

[ManocalypseParticipant 321]

http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2015/04/16/400075715/is-it-sexist-to-say-that-women-are-superior-to-mens?utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=npr&utm_term=nprnews&utm_content=20150424

And perhaps a warning to those that think science can make sense. In the hands of this misguided idiot, it doesn’t.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Good article. If nothing else, it proves the manginas have taken over social studies.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[ExsliventxsParticipant 1067]

What’s amazing is how they go on to spill this dribble…

On computer designed by men…

On a keyboard designed by men…

Using a mouse designed by men…

Using optical quantum mechanic processes found by men…

On a telecommunications network designed by men…

On a display device designed by men…

On a desk designed by men…

From wood harvested and sculpted by men…

Got coffee from a pot, dispensed by a machine made by men…

In a building built by men…

From natural resources harvested by men…

Powered with electricity discovered by men…

With power lines ran by men…

Probably got to work on a road designed by men…

No doubt the road was built by men…

Published on a website probably server hosted… by men.

I could go on.. but I think you get the picture.

 

You can’t take people who think women are superior seriously. They’re morons.

 

 

[DempsZParticipant 11]

So those nut jobs in ISIS and Boko Haram represent men in general in societies? And we’re called the irrational and bigoted gender…

[porky ryanParticipant 18]

what makes a greater propensity to act out in violence inferior?  sometimes i think that people forget the true nature of the reality we are rooted in because of the “advancements” of modern society.  of course most people can act in an according way of civility to one another in this world where the basic needs of most people are easily met.  but on the contrary when things come down to the basic need to survive, to compete for resources and territory the ability to act out in violence is very well important. we have the luxury to look down on this as barbarism but if conditions arose in such a way any one who would not act out in aggression to secure  their basic needs would not have them. and then where would all of these “superior women” be.

as far as men being bad for “oppressing women” i think this is totally ridiculous.  beyond the reality of physical sexes there are certain actions, traits, and behaviors that are traditionally thought of as either masculine or feminine.  logic vs feeling,  creation vs destruction, light vs darkness etc.  everyone of us has all of these qualities/traits/behaviors instilled in us and each individual tunes into certain traits and creates a particular balance within themselves individually.  although every man and woman is unique generalizations can be made to say that most fit one way and most fit the other.  people forget or are ignorant to the fact that a very large portion of the time that the human race has existed it has been oriented around matriarchal society.  the 12 millennia of “bad men” oppressing women is really just a drop in the bucket. they’re not bad, we’re not bad.  a balance has to be achieved to hold the fabric of society together. 12 millennia of “oppression” is really just the necessary amount of time for men to instill the perceived qualities and traits of masculinity onto human society at large in order to counter act the matriarchal influence of the past upon mankind.

this guy is a total p.c. douche bag who is out of touch with the real roots of human nature

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant 1270]

Considering women, and particularly feminist and sympathetic blue-pills/manginas/white knights, have been shaping many modern laws and policies, why should it surprise they would be considered “superior” in the societal context? Of course they’d rule something like being more prone to violence and being hypersexual as being a negative; it doesn’t gel with the gynocentric society that we live in. Nevertheless, as much as they might not want to admit it, they NEED men to make things happen. Men have kept society not only afloat, but going for centuries. That’s not going to stop any time soon.

Would you object if I said ‘whites are bad because they oppress blacks,’ or ‘Anglos are bad because they oppress Latinos,’ or ‘rich people are bad because they oppress the poor’? How come after 12 millennia of oppression of women by men, I can’t say men are bad for doing that?

I would. I would say you’re a f~~~ing quack who seems to know s~~~-all about history and society.

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Blue pill manginas are EVERYWHERE now from gaming websites I read (one started calling GTA 5 patriarchal for example) to so called comedians to actors who sit there and say s~~~ like “my better half”….through media which is the real educational tool these days blokes have been brainwashed

[KingOfTheSeaParticipant 1270]

Jim01 wrote:

Blue pill manginas are EVERYWHERE now from gaming websites I read (one started calling GTA 5 patriarchal for example) to so called comedians to actors who sit there and say s~~~ like “my better half”….through media which is the real educational tool these days blokes have been brainwashed

In the comics, too, unfortunately. Editors pressuring writers to make their characters female or get out. It sucks.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

Oh?

Article=Fail.

Fuck this planet.

[MadScientistParticipant 131]

IMO He is just cashing in on radical feminism. I don’t think he believes anything he is saying, but that makes him even more of a piece of s~~~.

[Colonel GaveAFuckParticipant 77]

Oh sure, we’re a birth defect… Because male and female species reproducing was just an accident, and let me guess? we are all a bunch of degenerate women! Lol… Ok mangina… Keep fapping to the women who verbally abuse you.

[peterfaParticipant 833]

Well, I studied human sexuality (super liberal and given by a woman).

So, the scrotum would have been the labia majora should you have been a woman, and the labia minora would be what is the skin around your penis and foreskin. So, what are they doing there since they have no purpose? Looks like it’s the other way around. The body just made the flesh but has nothing for it.

It seems like the information is used to bolster a gender theory that we’re basically all women until we develop into males but it’s really a sliding scale. Some people are all the way female and others are all the way male. Then they say that gender is cultural and it’s just traditional. Now that they’ve removed the traditional perspective of gender, that it’s a dichotomy, they’ll add transexual and tranvestitism. This starts to get a little muddy because it does imply there is a real objective man and a real objective woman. Never is it dealt with the assertion that people with gender disorders could simply be diseased, not just at a socially-unacceptable part in the gender scales.

To be fair, the woman who taught this while deeply liberal, feminist (and of course missing the point to the evidences she claim), she does value male sexuality, male genitalia (she says the scrotum is beautiful, especially when it tenses up, in the patter that it makes), and she’s disturbed by a lot of the toxic female behavior.

[Helen be DamnedParticipant 480]

KingOfTheSea wrote:

Jim01 wrote:

Blue pill manginas are EVERYWHERE now from gaming websites I read (one started calling GTA 5 patriarchal for example) to so called comedians to actors who sit there and say s~~~ like “my better half”….through media which is the real educational tool these days blokes have been brainwashed

In the comics, too, unfortunately. Editors pressuring writers to make their characters female or get out. It sucks.

That s~~~ didn’t work with Thor, that comic was canceled like 2 issues in. It didn’t work because it can’t. Not that this saves comics, they will continue to try the failing format.

"You can keep your soul, I don't want a cell-mate." - Them Crooked Vultures

[Schaefe89Participant 163]

I didn’t even open the link.  All I needed to know was the source was npr aka liberal / mangina central

[VanceElwoodParticipant 4]

That article isn’t science. Science finds causes, and states that which is objective. Science doesn’t deal with things like “women are better than man,” vice versa, because science doesn’t deal with arbitrary/relative words such as “better” or “worse”. This is just poor journalism, where some douche is trying to use scientific evidence to support a likely pre-conceived conclusion. People tend to look at scientific research journals (which are objective), and start applying their own conclusions to why the results are the way they are, through the lens of their own cognitive bias. I see this kind of crap all over the internet, I’ve even seen articles trying to use science to justify racism. If anything, this would constitute as “social science”, which should never be confused with hard science. I dislike a lot of social science, and even evo-psych, because most of the hypotheses are untestable, and can be considered little more than “just-so” stories.

"Agenda suicide, the drones work hard before they die." - The Faint

[Author]

Posts