Vogue Slut Shamelessly Explains the Chad/Dad Double Standard

[Anonymous 0]

Why Friends with Benefits are the Most Stable Relationships

Give her an A for honesty and an F for trust. Relationships are now 90% Relations~~~s because of one core cause: state-sponsored mistrust.
Giving women birth control, welfare, and the legal right to divorce-rape men has turned probably more than half of them into animals you simply cannot trust. Consider the beliefs she admits:
1. Friends With Benefits [FWB] relations~~~s are better than romances or marriages because of the lack of obligation to do “family” events; “obligations lead to resentment”
2. FWB’s do not create jealousy, instead, voyeuristic interest in her partner’s other sexual adventures
3. FWB’s allow sex as pure recreation, and experimentation she wouldn’t do with her boyfriend or husband.
4. FWB’s “they lack the soul-baring vulnerability and intense emotional investment”

In other words, because women are more independent from men now due to the debt-driven retail economy, welfare, and divorce-rape court, they can f~~~ chads, bait-and-switch dads with hot sex then cut them off when they decide to divorce-rape him and return to f~~~ing chads… guilt free! She talks about using betas for dad juice and f~~~ing chads at will like it’s a birthright.

She might argue that men do the same thing, but even if that was true, consider the big picture: if there was no welfare and divorce-rape courts, then the marriage and FWB markets would be naturally competitive, and find their own equilibrium.

But here’s the govt deformation of relationship markets: welfare and divorce-rape court are massively stacking the deck against men in the marriage market, and the retail economy is giving women a false sense of sustainable middle class employment, so they are picking top 20% promiscuous men [chads] for FWB’s, who often keep harems of f~~~ buddies that they pretend are FWB’s. You can’t be a “friend” to a woman and be f~~~ing her. FWB is a guilt-reduction construction women invented, and chads are playing along with. To him, and to most men, she’s a slut. Is that a double standard? Yes, slutty men are chads, and they will always be more admired than slutty women.

The govt deformation of the relationship markets are destroying the underlying trust necessary for equitable dating and marriage required to make a reasonable low-medium risk long term commitment decision. The risk is now is prohibitively high due to the deformation. The good news is, it won’t be long before the great govt deformation of social life collapses along with its great deformation of financial life. Then women will have to get off the c~~~ carousel and go back to actually prioritizing family over the fake sexual freedom they think they have. Without families, the species will regress fast. As trust-based trading systems erode, society will devolve and fragment into dynastic woman-enslaving tyrannies, and tribal polygamies by alphas who will enslave unmarried men and most women. Dark Age 2: the Reckoning, coming to a theater near you.

[Anonymous 12]

And they get to have multiple men to sponge off!

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22510]

Anonymous wrote:

Why Friends with Benefits are the Most Stable Relationships

Give her an A for honesty and an F for trust. Relationships are now 90% Relations~~~s because of one core cause: state-sponsored mistrust.
Giving women birth control, welfare, and the legal right to divorce-rape men has turned probably more than half of them into animals you simply cannot trust. Consider the beliefs she admits:
1. Friends With Benefits [FWB] relations~~~s are better than romances or marriages because of the lack of obligation to do “family” events; “obligations lead to resentment”
2. FWB’s do not create jealousy, instead, voyeuristic interest in her partner’s other sexual adventures
3. FWB’s allow sex as pure recreation, and experimentation she wouldn’t do with her boyfriend or husband.
4. FWB’s “they lack the soul-baring vulnerability and intense emotional investment”

In other words, because women are more independent from men now due to the debt-driven retail economy, welfare, and divorce-rape court, they can f~~~ chads, bait-and-switch dads with hot sex then cut them off when they decide to divorce-rape him and return to f~~~ing chads… guilt free! She talks about using betas for dad juice and f~~~ing chads at will like it’s a birthright.

She might argue that men do the same thing, but even if that was true, consider the big picture: if there was no welfare and divorce-rape courts, then the marriage and FWB markets would be naturally competitive, and find their own equilibrium.

But here’s the govt deformation of relationship markets: welfare and divorce-rape court are massively stacking the deck against men in the marriage market, and the retail economy is giving women a false sense of sustainable middle class employment, so they are picking top 20% promiscuous men [chads] for FWB’s, who often keep harems of f~~~ buddies that they pretend are FWB’s. You can’t be a “friend” to a woman and be f~~~ing her. FWB is a guilt-reduction construction women invented, and chads are playing along with. To him, and to most men, she’s a slut. Is that a double standard? Yes, slutty men are chads, and they will always be more admired than slutty women.

The govt deformation of the relationship markets are destroying the underlying trust necessary for equitable dating and marriage required to make a reasonable low-medium risk long term commitment decision. The risk is now is prohibitively high due to the deformation. The good news is, it won’t be long before the great govt deformation of social life collapses along with its great deformation of financial life. Then women will have to get off the c~~~ carousel and go back to actually prioritizing family over the fake sexual freedom they think they have. Without families, the species will regress fast. As trust-based trading systems erode, society will devolve and fragment into dynastic woman-enslaving tyrannies, and tribal polygamies by alphas who will enslave unmarried men and most women. Dark Age 2: the Reckoning, coming to a theater near you.

Other interesting items she writes:

– she has been f~~~ buddies witha guy for 8 years. She says she does not expect her first marriage to last 8 years. Any guy who marries her is a masochist.

– what she thinks she is describing as so cutting edge is nothing new at all. She has no brain to recognize what she is whining to have, what these stupid f~~~ing women are pining away for, is a lover. She wants to be married to a provider for security, and to have that separate dashing f~~~ buddy lover. And she wants society and the state to give her their legal and secular blesings and permision and protection to do so regardless of what the current husbank wants.

– everything about a traditional monogamous relationship is viewed negatively and a turn-off, yet they want to get married when the wall is coming and the baby rabies is raging. Because then security a good husbank provides THEM (screw it if the mariage helps the guy or not) becomes the driving paramount goal of acquiring. Given they initiate divorce they know they will do this to the guy at some point, its basically a crime of fraud on their part.

– they want to possess their husbank, but they dont want their husbank to possess them.

– she says she doesnt dismiss the benefits of committed long term relationships but anything she writes about these are in negative terms, and she already is saying her FIRST marriage wont last 8 years. So the denial is massive.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

In other words, because women are more independent from men now due to the debt-driven retail economy, welfare, and divorce-rape court, they can f~~~ chads, bait-and-switch dads with hot sex then cut them off when they decide to divorce-rape him and return to f~~~ing chads… guilt free! She talks about using betas for dad juice and f~~~ing chads at will like it’s a birthright.

Money shot right here.

Women are enabled to have zero responsibility or accountability. This is the admitted death of the social contract men and women used to make.

This is exactly why we walk away.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[xanthineParticipant 4903]

Yeah, lets just see how she feels about it in her 30’s, or better yet her 40’s.

Women today are simply choosing to f~~~ as many chads as possible while shunning romantic relationships until their 30’s. It works out great for awhile, they don’t have to be truthful or honest with men and have chads lining up to f~~~ them when they are young. There are still plenty of betas willing to pay for her s~~~ and fix things for her too for no sex.

The problem they run into (obviously) is the wall. Women lack the capacity for long term thinking and planning, so even though it is a well known phenomenon, they never see it coming.

So basically they are sacrificing the love and companionship of a good man who would take care of her for life. Instead, they want as much chad c~~~ as possible, which they get to enjoy for about 10 years. Then they get to enjoy the next 40 years alone with their cats and most likely in poverty.

Yeah western women are pretty stupid, but this is a good trend. It saves men from the marriage trap and inevitable divorce, since the men who would be susceptible when she is 20 are not as interested in a 30 year old used up whore.

[RogueParticipant 258]

Well the world needs sluts and whores…
Let them out themselves…
The great reset is coming, they are just practicing now, but in the future they will have no choice but will find their true occupations as sluts and whores and will need to get paid for it to survive…

The day will come…

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Slut is the new cool.

There compensating because men dont want relationships and marriage.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10909]

She’s not trying to explain the double standard she’s trying to justify the double standard. She’s also setting up the beta orbiters to stick around just a little bit longer because now women want FWBs! A lot of beta orbiters are going to read this as a renewed chance to be able to f~~~ those out of reach women that they have been simping for.
In the end she confirms, “Alpha f~~~s, beta cucks”
The song remains the same.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

Mr. Spock wrote:

She’s not trying to explain the double standard she’s trying to justify the double standard. She’s also setting up the beta orbiters to stick around just a little bit longer because now women want FWBs! A lot of beta orbiters are going to read this as a renewed chance to be able to f~~~ those out of reach women that they have been simping for.
In the end she confirms, “Alpha f~~~s, beta cucks”
The song remains the same.

Mr Spock, made a very important point. Its not about explaining the double standard is about it being justified.

Example: feminists say men just want sex, so women should be gold diggers in return.

Men dont wont fat women, so women should turn down short men. ETC

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Anonymous 0]

Agree, justification is included in her explanation because she is clearly defending the sexual double dealing which is her current plan: she’s in a alpha f~~~ing phase soon to be passing into the beta bucking phase, which she predicts will end in less than 8 years, after which she will return to alpha f~~~ing with more money. In making this prediction, she doesn’t explicitly admit that she will initiate the end of her future marriage, but it’s clearly not a fear for her…she is so confident that the Leviathan will bail her out with welfare and alimony and child support that she treats it like an expected biological passage like menopause.

To the point of justification of Dad F~~~over as payback for patriarchal crimes of history, that’s certainly part of the feminist list of grievances in their War on Men. Divorce Rape to them is reparations for millennia of patriarchal subjugation of women. Hypergamy is an unavoidable instinct in women, so gold-digging is so much like water thru their gills that they don’t know they are sharks. That being the case, if men want to swim with (and f~~~ with) sharks, they need to know how to catch them and get them in the shark tank without being killed and eaten by them. This means, under the modern deformation regime:
1. No marriage.
2. Intermittent cohabitation at most. Best if no cohabitation (avoid palimony suit)
3. Neuter yourself or always wear a hood.
4. If you do want kids, get married with a prenup. This is a high risk activity though.
5. If marriage is attempted, I would shelter anything over about $250,000 of assets offshore without her knowledge and inaccessible by the US govt…or have your brother hide it if you trust him.
6. I would not buy a house with her worth over 250k or whatever you are willing to surrender to her. The pre-nup would likely be voided no matter what it says if you have a kid with her.
7. I get that many men want to be a parent, because I did, and don’t regret it. I took the risk of divorce rape but largely avoided major damage because I refused to buy a house. The settlement was more child support than alimony which I was ok with, wanting to support the kid.

Point is, shark swimming is hazardous and one must be willing to lose a limb or two if engaging in it. The Great Social Deformation has made most women into sharks and that will remain the fact until the Leviathan that created the Deformation falls, and men once again lead families within tribal society, with women as happy and loyal companions, as was intended by evolution. Mass collectivist society is simply doomed to tyranny and failure.

[AttonParticipant]

HPV that is all I’ll say.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Sky-OParticipant 18936]

Double standards,

Double penetration

Across the nation

No hole can bring salvation

As DJ Labia continues to spin the greatest clits of the 80s, 90s and beyond.

In the top 40 countdown to the approaching of the wall

When objective reality

Collides with pumpkin fantasy

Chad & Beta. Two opposing but necessary energetic and cosmic forces in the paradigm known as Pumpkin’s mind.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

This woman is simply insufferable.

In other words, your f~~~ buddy gets all the good stuff about being in a relationship

We’re not exactly dealing w/a high caliber intellectual here:

…having to watch your girlfriend stab at the ingrown hairs on her bikini line while she watches the Kardashians. (That’s me—I’m the girlfriend who does that.)

Maybe the coolest thing about the f~~~-buddy economy is that it allows women to actually enjoy sex in a casual way, without having to enter an old-fashioned ownership contract. It celebrates female sexual autonomy. It’s a chance to explore ourselves and other people. And in the interim, we can discover who we are and what we like, instead of committing to a pseudo-marriage we aren’t ready for.

^ This is the cartoon bubble floating over the head of every Western female prior to hitting the wall.

It’s the embodiment of everything I literally despise about their thought process.

I don’t think most girls even limit the “ownership contract” notion to marriage, they view ANY form of a committed/monogomous relationship as ‘ownership’…As though it’s somehow infringing upon her person-hood.

And that last sentence, rationalizing becoming a cum dumpster, a receptacle for dozens…if not hundreds of men…

To have hot, steaming load, after load, AFTER LOAD of DNA, PUMPED into her orifices as her body and holes are recycled through the man-MEAT of society…

Is rationalized as some sort of “self-discovery”.

But, HEY maybe that’s not fair?

At least RECYCLABLES are sanitized, prior to being used by the next participant…

As though becoming a whore is a journey of noble pursuits.

She’s the Marco Polo of Man-MEAT.

F~~~ing sick.

This is what the modern woman has become.

This is how she thinks, rationalizes, and justifies her behavior.

This is why I can’t take any of them seriously.

Resident cynic.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

right now, when she’s young and still able to get all the sex the wants, she thinks friends with benefits are a great idea. In 10 years, when she’s post wall, unable to get all that attention from men anymore, and she needs help paying bills, amassing assets and saving for retirement, she’ll be writing another article bitching about ‘where have all the good men gone?’…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[Author]

Posts