Video: Did women kill chivalry?

[Vajra VarahaParticipant 1283]

Random finding I enjoyed….

[Bob the BuilderParticipant 115]

Learn how to handle a weapon biatches, you killed chivalry and I’m glad it’s dead. Now you can die in a third world country just like countless men who died giving you all the rights you abuse.

[Sky-OParticipant 18933]

Women never killed chivalry

Killing something would require a certain level of conscious thought, followed by action and at the least an understanding that once something is dead – it cannot come back to life.

But, they did ignore chivalry. And long enough to result in chivalry not dying but rather going into a coma. A low oxygen induced coma.

Unwilling to kill chivalry completely. There was a point in time when they put chivalry in a locked room, with only a minimal amount of food and water inside to sustain it. Along with some hope. And chivalry remained for a while, until it could not be sustained any longer and it could not escape from the room.

At one point, during a routine check years later, chivalry was found collapsed on the floor.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22503]

Video killed the radio star

/just came to me reading the title

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Branched offParticipant 10920]

Chivalry ceased to get women what they wanted. They didn’t actually want to be cared for and treasured by those who were stronger. They really wanted to be stronger themselves. Chivalry just made up for their deficits. The vote let them get the state to give them strength through legislation firstly to compensate for what nature had not give them and then a lot more too. Who needs chivalry when men have to provide for you and protect you one way or another anyway by law?

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22503]

Vajra Varaha wrote:

Random finding I enjoyed….
<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/2IMKyIj0_oU?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allow=”accelerometer; autoplay; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture” allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

Chivalry keeps men on the gynoplantation, for ALL women.

Nothanky.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[AFTParticipant 2722]

I think there is a great misunderstanding of the meaning of chivalry.

Chivalry has absolutely nothing to do with women. It is in fact a code of honour among fighting men “knights” in a bygone era.

The only part of chivalry remotely related to women is where the strong and powerful shouldn’t abuse their power and target the weak including women.

However that does not include some blue haired scrag screeching at you and hindering you. You’re not meant to target the weak but if they confront you and are in your way, by all means run them over.

Chivalry like honour never had anything to do with women!

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[AFTParticipant 2722]

Holding the door open for a woman has nothing to do with chivalry.

But expecting men to know which women are strong and independent feminists and which are not and somehow able to mind read their opposite behavioural expectations is nothing short of insane.

Not forgetting that if an alpha chad opens the door it’s a completely different gesture than when beta simp does it.

Women killed sanity, and any chance that men would want any part of them in the process.

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Vajra Varaha wrote:

Did women kill chivalry?

Women don’t know what chivalry even is.

Spoiler: It has fu​ck all to do with women.

[Vajra VarahaParticipant 1283]

AFT wrote:

Chivalry like honour never had anything to do with women!

If you haven’t read “Gynocentrism” or “Chivalry” by Peter Wright, I recommend.

Chivalry was a feminist invention around 900AD.

[Vajra VarahaParticipant 1283]

Chivalry is the ultimate codified s~~~ test.
It even comes with instruction manuals…

[GrumpyParticipant]

FFS
Not this garbage again.
Look folks, chivalry is a code of conduct primarily for combat, ergo combatants. The un-unified and mostly uncoded (meaning not CANON) idea of “chivalry” is based in the belief of treating others in a decent manner before and after combatants are done fighting, which in turn gives the perception of “noble” lineage of and to the practitioners of “chivalry”
It’s documented historical roots are with the French Calvary 1100 -1200 AD, and even prior to that with the “noble habitus”, provides a thin veneer of civility to/for combatants and the treatment of non combatants who as a matter of bloody historical record were almost all MEN.
It is further defined by acting in accordance with the basic fundamentals of Noblesse Oblige;
1. Whoever claims to be noble must conduct himself nobly.
2. (Figuratively) One must act in a fashion that conforms to one’s position and privileges with which one has been born, bestowed and/or has earned
*** Note item one,as that demand has never changed in the slightest in 1000 years. It’s about him***
It is also heavily referenced and attributed to the Moors of the 700’s, Bushido, and various other “cultures and beliefs” that deal with ones own personal conduct towards self and others.
Regardless of verbiage the one common line in ALL chivalry related commentary is the duty and actions of a MAN and MEN only

It is not “courtly love” as demanded by woman and romantics. As they falsely claim that was introduced during Earths European Middle ages, when in fact this “current” interpretive form has its roots in Victorian Europe. Nor is it “Courtesy” as defined by the same people above, because that is how one is “supposed” to act in an acceptable manner in the “courts” of the various royalty, which in turn was further dictated by “religion”
It is not the “reformation” by the various “church’s” of any religion, as can be proven through history via the recorded acts and events perpetrated in the name of their “gods”. The only thing in common with chivalry is the “do unto others, as you would have done unto you” part (rarely practiced) of every damn religion.

The basis is simple.
As you treat with me, and I shall in turn do like wise with you. You have no right, nor reasonable expectation to be treated “nicely” when you deal with me with hostility and malice.
Today’s “chivalry” or lack thereof, is a direct and appropriate response.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Chivalry is a word that is currently used to mean special treatment of women and it came from the courtly love of the troubadour for the female court. The men of court all went off to war and troubadour’s moved in and wrote love songs and seduced the women. Then when men returned from combat they were expected to act like the troubadours described love.

That’s why it is said that women invented chivalry. Women who require chivalry are users and show their poor personalities by expecting freebies from men because vagina.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Vajra Varaha wrote:

If you haven’t read “Gynocentrism” or “Chivalry” by Peter Wright, I recommend.

I recommend the Book of Chivalry by Geoffroi de Charny, or The Book of the Order of Chivalry by Ramon Llull, or Cretien de Troyes’ treatise.

If you want to learn about chivalry, read from the guys who actually lived it. You’ll find it has almost nothing to do with women, but everything to do with fighting men.

The problem is, women have intentionally confused courtly love for chivalry. Under the rules of courtly love, women are prizes to be wooed. Women like that idea.

Under actual chivalry, women are essentially property.

A chivalric knight wouldn’t think of mistreating a woman alone, but not for her own sake. He would refrain from affronting her out of respect for the knight to whom she belonged. An affront to her would be a disrespectful insult to him.

However… if a chivalric knight defeats another knight in honorable combat, then all that defeated knight’s possessions, his horses, his arms, his armor, and his woman, go to the victorious knight, to do with as he pleases. Today one could call it rape, but it was perfectly acceptable under the rules of chivalry, because how can one rape what one has already fairly won? And doubtless those fair noble damsels were all juiced up for their new alpha as well.

[Knights Templar RisingParticipant 5106]

I’ve never been chivalrous in my 50 years, unless it was completely calculated in order to get laid. Even in my blue pill days, I had the mindset of “that’s not my problem sweetie”…I guess there was a dormant red pill in there all along.

Sovereignty above all else.

[Vajra VarahaParticipant 1283]

sidecar wrote:

I recommend the Book of Chivalry by Geoffroi de Charny, or The Book of the Order of Chivalry by Ramon Llull, or Cretien de Troyes’ treatise.

If you want to learn about chivalry, read from the guys who actually lived it. You’ll find it has almost nothing to do with women, but everything to do with fighting men.

Grumpy wrote:

FFS
Not this garbage again.
Look folks, chivalry is a code of conduct primarily for combat, ergo combatants. The un-unified and mostly uncoded (meaning not CANON) idea of “chivalry” is based in the belief of treating others in a decent manner before and after combatants are done fighting, which in turn gives the perception of “noble” lineage of and to the practitioners of “chivalry”

you both missed the target Im afraid.
And Im kind of surprised.

[Author]

Posts