unicorn?

[keeler129Participant 2]

[ExsliventxsParticipant 1067]

She wasn’t a unicorn.

She was however, very sympathetic, empathetic, well-read, verbose, concise, intelligent, calm, well-rounded, gorgeous, well behaved, interesting and a bit regal as women go… very lady like, very refreshing.

She had all the GOOD traits men look for in a woman, at least on her videos.

Maybe she would have still raked you over the coals if she disagreed with you, she just might not have done it to the heart-ripping degree others would. (Maybe she would have been the same bitch as the others, we’ll never know.)

Sadly, these women are so rare, that to go hunt for one and believe you’ve found her, is akin to taking a grenade out, pulling the pin and hoping it doesn’t blow up in your face. You have to find the dud, you only have 1 life. Go give it a shot. Not feeling stupidly brave? No one here is either.

 

[hmskl’dParticipant 6413]

The little voice in my brain reminds me not to believe anything I hear and only half of what I see from women.

 

[keeler129Participant 2]

I think that is as close to a unicorn we will ever find

[Anonymous 42]

Unicorn? F~~~ the collateral damage!

 

 

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

I ‘think’ she is but would always carry a loaded gun. I fell in love with her many months ago. She is very religious and at the time of vid, still a virgin.

However, women change and even at her level I can still see the PMS issue and eventually the menopause insanity.

She’s lovely and I would be with her in a heartbeat …. until she had to be shot.

She might have a problem with 55yo me though 😂

[KahnParticipant 41]

OH COME ON! This is the 2nd thread this week about f~~~ing unicorns/NAWALTS. We need a rule against this s~~~ or something.

I mean, I had my own “Maybe there’s a NAWALT out there somewhere” phase, but I didn’t go around playing “pin the tail on the donkey” with it, trying to imagine every girl I met as a NAWALT. No, I was realistic and if anything my standards WENT UP. But you know what? I found a f~~~ing “NAWALT” or what I thought was one, and boy how wrong I turned out to be.

NAWALTS DO NOT EXIST.

and even if they did, you would never find one. You know why? Not because they’re rare (which, if they exist, they are). But because SO MANY WOMEN ARE GOOD AT PRETENDING TO BE NAWALT.

Someone (his name was ****) had a good explanation of this the other day:

I think this should be a topic for a thread in itself because a lot of people don’t seem to get it.
Here’s the simple formula from Einstein’s observation:
NAWALT (+/-) OWNERSHIP = AWALT
His observation: Men marry women hoping they’ll never change, they always do! Women marry men hoping they can change them they never do.
In very young, or emotionally or mentally challenged women, just emotional ownership will flick the switch. Just tell her you love her or profess exclusiveness or show excessive mangina activity,,,and then sit back and watch the real woman emerge.For some, it’s just moving in together that implies ownership. It triggers the change Bridezillas will trigger on an engagement ownership. All they’re thinking of is the wedding day. Many even admit afterwards it was all they were thinking of. Most trigger on the wedding day Some will NAWALT past the wedding day to the birth of the first child to trigger.Really smart ones like Wendi Deng (Rupert Murdoch’s Ex) will hit the 10 year mark ownership for maximum alimony before triggering monkey branching. Other variants of ownership triggers are as bizarre as the guy giving up drinking, finally. I’ve seen this one in real life and once here on the forums, both after many years and children. It’s a type of emotional ownership.
In all cases, once ownership is achieved, they no longer have any romantic interest in the male what so ever. Romantic interest in the male isn’t good after ownership is achieved for evolutionary survival reasons that may be a bit too much for this particular thread. Though, it’s still biologically beneficial for the woman and offspring if the male retains romantic interest. This NAWALT stage is partly contrived but it’s mostly Darwinian biology. Because it’s universal I don’t think women have that much control over it.
NAWALTS are real. Their lil hearts really do go pitter patter at the sight of their love, even the thought of their love. The chemicals in their body can now be measured empirically. Research is going into replicating those chemicals with a “Love Drug” But it’s just a phase that human females have evolved to secure a resource, which was always necessary throughout evolution of Sapiens.All they do after the NAWALT phase is sociopathic “improve” or exploit the resource (male) to the maximum. Hence always trying to “change” a guy for the better (in their eyes). If they have an opportunity to gain a better resource, they’ll take it, hence hypergamy.
As Lawrence Shannon observed in “The Predatory Female” He describes it beautifully. Download his free book and go to page 16. He calls it The Chameleon Syndrome, Substitute NAWALT = Chameleon, and OWNERSHIP = Subdue male. One thing no one seems to have noticed is that the change happens virtually overnight.
It might make a great thread to see if guys remember the exact time their NAWALTS turned to AWALTS.

P.S. I forgot to mention the minus sign in the equation (-). This is when the female finds out she isn’t going to own anyone or anything. Sit back with popcorn (at a safe distance) and watch the NAWALT explode into an AWALT.

I don’t know that I agree with him 100% but it’s a pretty good explanation, and it may bring you some peace, in the meantime… If you must go looking for NAWALTs… most of the guys here don’t really want to hear about it because for the most part… we don’t care. And as a warning, your looking for trouble if you go looking for a NAWALT, women will pick up on this and exploit it. Because that’s what women do: exploit and manipulate.

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

She is a TRADCON.

These kinds of women want to go back to traditional gender roles.Go back to the plantation BOY.You work 12 hours  days so i can watch soap operas    while i iron clothes .The same kinds of women who opposed the ERA and women voting because they didnt want to be made eligible for the draft and selective service.Well guess what  they got to eat their cake and have it too because they will never be forced to defend the Ukraine or South Korea.

They give you a pat on the head and a seductive wink so you think the plantation is shark free now.”Here i am im a NAWALT we exist      so you just gotta look hard enough to find one of us.

For our generation and for at least the next few to come NAWALTS  are to the world what a gnat is to a muskox

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[RoyDalParticipant]

Some archaeology site posted pictures of skeletons of a species of rhinoceros that resembles modern horses. Thus the legend of the unicorn was born in the Stone Age. That species is long extinct.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Vector VikingParticipant 413]

I think she almost gets it. Some of her statements I agree with, but ultimately I think she’s mostly parroting. There are no NAWALTS. Alligators don’t go skydiving on the weekends, subterranean wish-granting jellyfish aren’t real, and there are no NAWALTS.

This isn’t a terrible thing either. It’s just part of reality. Women are gonna be women, and most of their problems (which have been gaslighted into ours) stem from when they try to be men. It’s not like there used to be NAWALTS and we should all sit around sobbing about their extinction. You want a condensed version of Shakespeare’s Taming of the Shrew (1593)? Tupac Shakur’s quote: “If you’re hanging with a cool female, that’s alright, but if you’re with a bitch, you got to break ’em and shake ’em”. There have never been NAWALTS.

[Anonymous 42]

Hey guys, I found a real unicorn, next to a centaur, for real, I was digging in my back yard and came across one……..

 

 

[Author]

Posts