Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › UK: wolf-whistling to be considered a hate crime
This topic contains 34 replies, has 29 voices, and was last updated by Anonymous 1 year, 6 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Wolf-whistling at women is to be considered a hate crime by 43 police forces across the UK after a trial by Nottinghamshire police. Correct me if I’m wrong, but misogyny is defined as hatred towards women. Correct me if I’m wrong again, but wolf-whistling is anything but hatred, it’s an expression of desire and appreciation of beauty – anything BUT hate in my book.
Here is a quote from the article:
If agreed, abuse directed at women would be treated more seriously than comparable crimes against men, and could even lead to tougher sentences in the courts. Misogynistic incidents will include harassment in the street, verbal abuse, unwanted physical approaches, taking photographs without consent or sending unwanted text messages.
There is so much wrong in that quote I don’t even know where to begin. But to highlight one thing, it says unwanted physical approaches. How on earth is a man supposed to know whether his approach is wanted or not? Even the hottest men can’t be 100% sure. So here’s what will happen… men won’t bother approaching women anymore, and women may have to begin approaching men. So I’m not 100% against this particular clause as if it goes on long enough, and is publically enforced, it may just work in men’s favour… and by that time, we will tell them where to go!
Meanwhile, in Telford, Rotherham, Oxford, and most other towns and cities real hate crimes, such as Asian grooming gangs raping white teenage girls, are swept under the carpet.
Seriously, my country is now a very lost cause.
Anonymous43stay away, ignore, physically move away. Put obstacles between you and women. body cams.
change your behavior in obvious way signalling repulsion.
stay away, ignore, physically move away. Put obstacles between you and women. body cams.
change your behavior in obvious way signalling repulsion.
I’ve done this, and then I’ve been harassed and shamed for being anti-social, lol.
Let the government infested parasites pass more laws like this soon it will be a barren landscape for women when every quality man starts to avoid them.
I’ve done this, and then I’ve been harassed and shamed for being anti-social, lol.
Don’t worry about what other people think or say about you only you can control what you do. Keep doing what May suggested it will save you in the long run.
Wolf-whistling at women is to be considered a hate crime by 43 police forces across the UK
The Limeys might want to consider moving to Canada. Grabbing the butt of young women is now considered appropriate behaviour. Canada’s king has said so himself…
Folks, the UK government is beginning to fracture due to the malaise of indecision on Brexit.
You know what is the problem with that ? Here garbage collectors wolf-whistle to signal that the driver can start the garbage compressor.
We all know how entitled c~~~s are, for sure 50% of the time, if there was a c~~~ around, they will think that those guys whistled at her !Everyday they give us another reason to just ignore them.
I’m just waiting for a “I miss when men used to wolf-whistle at me in the streets” post ! HAHAHANever mind wolf whistling, I think the Milk tray man should be banned. He goes a lot further than wolf whistling to pay an unsolicited compliment. He bloody climbs in windows to give women chocolates. He needs to get put right to the sex offenders’ register after a decade on the nonces wing in jail. Filthy pervert.
The Uk is buggered.
A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own
stay away, ignore, physically move away. Put obstacles between you and women. body cams.
change your behavior in obvious way signalling repulsion.
I’ve done this, and then I’ve been harassed and shamed for being anti-social, lol.
Im anti social, im proud of it, and I shame them back.
I don’t need other people to carry me up becouse I hate my self and have an empty existence.
They lower their heads every time.
To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.
Meh
I put the onus and responsibility of proving concrete evidence and vocal confirmation of interest and intent squarely on the woman’s shoulders. I ignore all “cues” except for direct and absolute communications, and I wont “initiate”, women can do that from now on.There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it
Anonymous11What happens to men who have birds that wolf-whistle?
If it is from an Alpha it is considered flirting and perfectly acceptable. If it is from a Beta it is considered sexual harassment and is creepy and unwanted.
For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
I support this law. I’m sick of all the white knights and betas giving women undeserved attention and blowing up their egos to the point of obnoxiousness. The less attention men give women, the better.
Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.
Even though these laws are blatantly sexist towards men, they are going to be worse for women in the long run. Women gain a lot from men (money, favors, etc) but men do not gain anything from women. Ultimately this will make it harder for women to access male resources, and it will prevent men from offering their resources to women, which they shouldn’t be doing anyway.
I’ve noticed something interesting within the last year or two. I have seen a lot of women walking along highways and roads. They are walking in areas where it is pretty obvious they are either stranded or do not own a car to get where they are going.
These same women would have been offered rides by men in the past, but no longer. This is just in the US, where it is not yet illegal to ask them if they need a ride, and men are choosing not to anyway. Not hard to see what will happen once these laws are passed here too.
Let them dig their own graves. In ten years, they’ll he asking where the men are.
Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805But to highlight one thing, it says unwanted physical approaches.
Have you noticed how women are now complaining about not receiving any physical approaches?
But that is not our problem.
Why won’t making false rape allegations be considered a hate crime? I think we all know why.
All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.
It’s a good thing, generally speaking English men are too moronically chivalrous, they’re somewhat even more blue pilled than Swedish men, so they deserve a good lesson.
The most voted comment in the DM article is funny:
“What a load of rubbish. No wonder the police don’t have time to deal with real crime. You are welcome to wolf whistle me anytime boys, I had my first wolf whistle 60 years ago and they never did me any harm.”
Lol 😀
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
I support this law. I’m sick of all the white knights and betas giving women undeserved attention and blowing up their egos to the point of obnoxiousness. The less attention men give women, the better.
Even though these laws are blatantly sexist towards men, they are going to be worse for women in the long run. Women gain a lot from men (money, favors, etc) but men do not gain anything from women. Ultimately this will make it harder for women to access male resources, and it will prevent men from offering their resources to women, which they shouldn’t be doing anyway.
I’ve noticed something interesting within the last year or two. I have seen a lot of women walking along highways and roads. They are walking in areas where it is pretty obvious they are either stranded or do not own a car to get where they are going.
These same women would have been offered rides by men in the past, but no longer. This is just in the US, where it is not yet illegal to ask them if they need a ride, and men are choosing not to anyway. Not hard to see what will happen once these laws are passed here too.
Spot on, for both.
What amuses me it’s the hate crime part: it’s like using a flamethrower to kill ants within your house.
Is it wolf-whistling childish? Yes
Is it wolf-whistling unpolite? Yes
Is it wolf-whistling totally uneffective to approach a woman? Yes
Is it wolf-whistling an hate crime? No, being childish and unpolite and very uneffective at approaching women isn’t hatred.SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Folks, the UK government is beginning to fracture due to the malaise of indecision on Brexit.
This should be a thread on its own. How long before critical mass is reached.
mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678