UK mgtow and TV documentary – CS MGTOW

[HimeoParticipant 471]

Barbar makes a great point in the second video. The only legitimate MGTOW representative is an empty chair.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Buford wrote:

The risk with this kind of thing is that it becomes the latest ‘fad’ rather than men coming to this of their own free will.

Mango Ingaway wrote:

Honestly, my bigger fear is that they would take what mgtow’s say and twist it to make us look like a bunch of crazies.

Keymaster wrote:

MGTOW is not open for discussion., deliberation, negotiation or debate.

I’m just now reading this thread. A few minutes ago I posted one regarding “The Monetization of MGTOW”. Go figure. I apologize as I handn’t seen this thread as of yet. It seems to touch on the very thing I had started a thread for, and addresses that exact concern. My deepest apologies for the intrusion gentleman.

With that said… I know if anyone can handle such a task, it would be KM. Hands Down.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Well, this is interesting.

On 07.21 we heard back from the BBC in an email from Richie Carr. “thanks for introducing… yeah we’re doing this documentary…. ” not much else but they suggested a possible Skype call. They said “We could arrange a Skype call this week if you’d like to put aces to names [sic] and discuss the film in a little more detail?”

07.25 we responded saying “Did you mean ACCESS to names? We strictly contacted you as a website. Like the New York Times, 20/20 or 60 Minutes. Not as an “individual” person or persons.”…. and let them know if they have general questions we are available for that only.

Almost immediately after our email…..

On 07.21 a user “Mad Dog” (with an angry face avatar like Hitler) joins the forum and starts littering the place with: “Women should be beaten and controlled into submission”. Extremely radical stuff etc.. He didn’t get away with it, and I personally schooled his ass on that. “MGTOW are in no circumstances interested in beating or controlling women into submission. That is highly unbecoming, not permitted and a position of weakness”. He wouldn’t change his stance, and REFUSED to accept it. Noting but insults followed. He was warned not to post that s~~~. Sent an email. there was no reply, but he kept posting. He was then booted after having been given every benefit of the doubt.

IP address located central London UK. ISP Hosting Services Inc.
We have all his posts and our counter arguments.
CLEARLY an attempt to shine MGTOW in a negative light.

—

On 07.22 a user “Death” (grim reaper avatar) joins the forum and attempts the same in an identical style. Same mail service for registration. Same response from everyone. Same kind of failure attempt. IP address ALSO located in London UK. ISP Hosting Services Inc.

—

On 07.23 a user “Crew Crew” (old photo of sailors in a group) joins the forum and attempts the same in an identical style. Same mail service for registration. IP address ALSO located in London UK. ISP Hosting Services Inc. Didn’t even engage and just threw his ass out. Posted an alert notice in the forums to inform members the user and threads were trashed. There will be no more discussing with these people. Just trashed unapologetically.

They JUST wanted to paint MGTOW as radical extremists and failed.

3 days in a row. Exactly the same s~~~ from London.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[FullMetalExoParticipant 2383]

Keymaster wrote:

They JUST wanted to paint MGTOW as radical extremists and failed. 3 days in a row. Exactly the same s~~~ from London.

Phaha yeh, damn they are bitter as f~~~. Sour.

It’s really great Info you uncovered guys, respect to CS, Niko, KM, Barbar etc.! Dodged a nuke.

-----------

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Keymaster wrote:

QUOTE: “Please warn the guys that the BBC documentary was going to be a scam to associate MGTOW with far right elements. That’s it. No-one should interview with those f~~~ers.

I figured it had to be something like that, though not specifically what. It CAN’T be that they actually wanted to learn or broadcast the truth of MGTOW, because five minutes in the archives here or on google could give them that.

So they’re obviously lying to MGTOW from the get go, and you can’t trust a journalist propagandist who lies up front like that to ever broadcast the truth.

F~~~ ’em.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

For your interest, the same assholes returned again for a 4th time – after being deleted 3 times for totally inappropriate behavior – and attempted to conduct their own interview. This time, they were not deleted. MGTOW will break them instead.

/forums/topic/what-are-you-doing-except-boycotting-marriage/

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[dciParticipant 1]

Why should the femimatrix put the feminine matrix in danger for spreading the truth? its a trap.

[Anonymous 5]

The real victims here are women.
Has anyone ever heard any man complain about the falling marriage contract rates?,,,,,,,lol
More and more men are being saved from women every year.
As long as these feminists attack any form of dissension, they’re abetting the marriage contract decline.
Long live the feminists!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

And they tried it again today:

/forums/topic/just-another-fraud-going-his-own-way/

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RedDecoderParticipant 1]

As you may know by now Reggie Yates was a no show for the google hangout but in case this documentary comes up again I’ll leave a summary of my findings here.

 

Reasons Reggie Yates can’t be trusted

He is engaged so I doubt he can transparently explain gynocentrism http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2921297/Reggie-Yates-engaged-model-Tia-Ward-proposing-stunning-ring-designed.html. Why is someone not living the lifestyle holding the microphone? Contrast that with this http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/11677993/When-men-talk-about-feminism-it-brings-out-the-worst-of-Twitter.html

Potentially a very gynocentric upbringing but there are conflicting stories on his childhood ‘raised by his mother’ http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/i-want-children-know-grandfather-4319105 vs mother remarrying https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJyNOvtLMvM

Although I can quote this ‘I have four sisters, and with my mum and nieces as well there are a lot of women in the family, so it feels important to look after them’ and note the failure to call himself egalitarian or humanist ‘I’m not sure if I would call myself a feminist. I just know that I respect women and that’s the most important thing to me’ http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/the-womens-blog-with-jane-martinson/2011/aug/19/reggie-yates-domestic-violence

Has the time to white knight http://www.cosmopolitan.co.uk/entertainment/news/a19571/the-voice-reggie-yates-holly-willoughby-objectification-of-women/ for someone who has a career partaking in this (1 example of many) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skvT4AepOXw

Speaking on his extreme documentaries listen to 00:24 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhU1TAjqhN4

And at 01.14 what would the strand of hope be when observing MGTOW in the eyes of an engaged man?

Here is the first short film he made, which is a hit piece against an absent father. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HVefb7bmVY

The world seems to be a conveyor belt of teenage girls getting pregnant with unreliable men. You’d think their own mother would remind them to choose wisely.

 

Now moving onto sundog pictures

Here is a photo of the team from the twitter feed of one of the founders. I hope it speaks 1000 words.

Watch out Farringdon we are in our new Sun(digs)! A new era of @sundog_pictures has arrived! Very proud ?? pic.twitter.com/U1eM0hlnY9

— sambranson (@sambranson) July 13, 2015

 

From the warning provided by CsMgtow https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBX9abqZIDg 05:30 Sundog were more interested in the radical characters. Think about what makes good television and consider that this would be shown on BBC Three which is a sensationalist pop channel.

Company finances suggest this company will continue to comfort the public with lies, not hit them with the truth because that doesn’t make money. http://companycheck.co.uk/company/06906545/SUNDOG-PICTURES-LIMITED/financial-accounts

 

[RedDecoderParticipant 1]

As you may know by now Reggie Yates was a no show for the google hangout but in case this documentary comes up again I’ll leave a summary of my findings here.

 

Reasons Reggie Yates can’t be trusted

He is engaged so I doubt he can transparently explain gynocentrism http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2921297/Reggie-Yates-engaged-model-Tia-Ward-proposing-stunning-ring-designed.html. Why is someone not living the lifestyle holding the microphone? Contrast that with this http://www.telegraph.co.uk/men/the-filter/11677993/When-men-talk-about-feminism-it-brings-out-the-worst-of-Twitter.html

Potentially a very gynocentric upbringing but there are conflicting stories on his childhood ‘raised by his mother’ http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/i-want-children-know-grandfather-4319105 vs mother remarrying https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qJyNOvtLMvM

Although I can quote this ‘I have four sisters, and with my mum and nieces as well there are a lot of women in the family, so it feels important to look after them’ and note the failure to call himself egalitarian or humanist ‘I’m not sure if I would call myself a feminist. I just know that I respect women and that’s the most important thing to me’ http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/the-womens-blog-with-jane-martinson/2011/aug/19/reggie-yates-domestic-violence

Has the time to white knight http://www.cosmopolitan.co.uk/entertainment/news/a19571/the-voice-reggie-yates-holly-willoughby-objectification-of-women for someone who has a career partaking in this (1 example of many) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=skvT4AepOXw

Speaking recently on his extreme documentaries listen to 00:24 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XhU1TAjqhN4 And at 01.14 what would the strand of hope be when observing MGTOW in the eyes of an engaged man?

Here is the first short film he made, which is a hit piece against an absent father. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HVefb7bmVY

 

Now moving onto sundog pictures

Here is a photo of the team from the twitter feed of one of the founders. I hope it speaks 1000 words.

https://twitter.com/sambranson/status/620652973459439616

 

From the warning provided by CsMgtow https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GBX9abqZIDg 05:30 Sundog were more interested in the radical characters. Think about what makes good television and consider that this would be shown on BBC Three which is a sensationalist pop channel.

Company finances suggest this company will continue to comfort the public with lies, not hit them with the truth because that doesn’t make money. http://companycheck.co.uk/company/06906545/SUNDOG-PICTURES-LIMITED/financial-accounts

 

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Just bumping this thread up for anyone interest. Lots of chatter about the BBC and MGTOW this week.
(take note this was back in August)

…. or you can search the forums for “BBC” if you want.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

If MG-TOW ever want to do a documentary it should be with an independent media like RT (Russia Today) because these people will not spin things that was said during the interview.

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[HimeoParticipant 471]

The youtube MGTOW crowd saw this coming months ago.

Refusing to participate with the BBC was the right call. The only legit representative of MGTOW is this:

MGTOW should not talk with the media. There’s no point. No single person can represent the group. There is no group. Just a bunch of guys that got tired of the game and decided to go do other things.

MGTOW does not exist. MGTOW are everywhere.

[Author]

Posts