Australia considering lower taxes for women, and higher taxes for men

Topic by Eric Lauder

Eric Lauder

Home Forums MGTOW Central Australia considering lower taxes for women, and higher taxes for men

This topic contains 61 replies, has 29 voices, and was last updated by Gui  gui 1 year, 7 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 63 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #835066
    +13
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    After accounting for such sensitivities, they found the tax rate for women in the US should be at least 20% lower than the male tax rate. For Italy, they said it should be 32% lower, and for Norway at least 9% lower.

    “The idea of gender based taxation is not totally new, neither in practice nor in theory,” they wrote in their paper.

    Taxing labour income of women less than that of men satisfies criteria of optimal taxation … [and] one could obtain more tax revenue with the same average tax rates by reducing the rates on women of a certain amount and increasing that of men by less.”

    Including lower taxes on SINGLE WOMEN!!!

    They found that married women were the main drivers of higher female tax sensitivities because they were often the secondary income earners in a household, and therefore faced much higher effective marginal tax rates. But they said that shouldn’t stop single women from enjoying lower tax rates too.

    “Using the same tax rates for single women and married women in a sense favours single women since they are taxed at a lower rate than their labour elasticity would entail,” the paper said.

    “However, arguments about affirmative action and potential discrimination apply to single women as well and therefore … lower taxes for single women may be [in sync] with other social goals. Also single mothers are a good portion of single women and to the extent they are a category at risk of poverty (at least in the US), lowering taxes on them (including making them negative) may have other advantages and substitute for other welfare programs.”

    TRANSLATION:
    Even single women have a vagina, therefore they deserve more money because having a vagina is a merit.

    https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2018/jun/08/pink-and-blue-forms-is-gender-based-tax-really-as-crazy-as-it-sounds

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #835069
    +10
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    This s~~~ is real, and those are real threats for men.
    This is even worse than divorce: a man can easily avoid divorce rape by not signing a marriage contract and not cohabiting, but such kind of “reforms” are going to hurt even MGTOW.

    The most unfair outcomes are from its application to single women and single men, and to lesbian couples and gay couples: a lesbian couple is gonna taking twice benefits, while a gay couple is gonna being hurted twice – still, as long as it benefits the holy vagina, such unfairness doesn’t matter in the slighest.
    Personally I couldn’t care less if it’s applied just only to heterosexual married couples: it would be almost irrelevant, since men who sign a marriage contract are screwed anyway.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #835084
    +10

    Anonymous
    12

    There is already a bank down here that pays women more to make up for the “gender pay gap”!

    On the bright side the more insane they get the more people will turn away from their ideas.

    #835091
    +3
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    There is already a bank down here that pays women more to make up for the “gender pay gap”!

    On the bright side the more insane they get the more people will turn away from their ideas.

    Paying women more isn’t a real threat: the more a business pay women, the less women are hired and the more chances for men to be hired.
    In my company there are almost no women, still it would pass every test about “gender pay gap” because the few women have jobs ranging from low management to higher management, and there are no women in the least paid jobs, so that’s the situation:

    33% least paid jobs: zero women
    33% median jobs: less than 10% women
    33% best paid jobs: less than 10% women

    Furthermore there are more people in the 33% least paid jobs than in the other 66% together.

    So every stat will show that on average women are being paid more than men.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #835092
    +8
    BritGHOW
    BritGHOW
    Participant
    2566

    Sure, they can pay lower taxes, but only if their voting power, their pay for equal work and anything else where there are in fact currently on a equal footing with men is reduced by the same factor, otherwise get f~~~ed.

    #835097
    +3
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    Sure, they can pay lower taxes, but only if their voting power, their pay for equal work and anything else where there are in fact currently on a equal footing with men is reduced by the same factor, otherwise get f~~~ed.

    There’s actually a chance that some companies would try to exploit a lower taxation on women: companies exploiting tax benefits on workers isn’t a new thing – it actually works so:
    The government reduces taxation on a kind of worker, let’s say -20%.
    In the following years the company raise less the wages of such workers benefitting lower taxation, compared to other workers not benefitting of lower taxation.

    That’s why selective tax benefits tend to backfire.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #835103
    +12
    Shine
    Shine
    Participant
    1696

    Just become a woman overnight who is transitioning back to a man, problem solved.

    Somedays I just feel like pulling the plug on the internet, and tv, just stick to gaming. Atleast this madness hasn’t found a foothold yet, time will tell, 2020 is fast approaching, isn’t there some agenda 2030 they were trying to ramp up.

    Stay strong brothers.

    "Society is to blame" Denton

    #835105
    +6

    Anonymous
    12

    Just become a woman overnight who is transitioning back to a man, problem solved.

    Somedays I just feel like pulling the plug on the internet, and tv, just stick to gaming. Atleast this madness hasn’t found a foothold yet, time will tell, 2020 is fast approaching, isn’t there some agenda 2030 they were trying to ramp up.

    Stay strong brothers.

    Not a bad idea.These days all you have to do is identify as something in your own special way and no one can argue with you. Add in Muslim or some other special group and you have it made.

    #835108
    +11

    Anonymous
    1

    I don’t believe they would get away with implementing this one.

    It’s so blatantly sexist and utterly ridiculous.

    Even your average blue pill male would question this one.

    #835109
    +7

    Anonymous
    11

    I double dog dare them to implement this in the US. I’ll work around it and be way better off for it. Right now, I am an honest tax payer even though I get ass raped.

    There’s nothing like watching a womb productive Section 8 queen flipping out that SNAP card in the grocery store queue then hopping in a vehicle that is way newer and more costly than anything I can afford.

    #835117
    +6

    Anonymous
    42

    Because men and our income are disposable, so why not cut the tree at the stump instead of wasting time trimming the branches?

    Gender Equality is gender discrimination disguised as gender equality.

    GIVE THEM NOTHING! TOBY!

    #835118
    +8
    JB Books
    JB Books
    Participant
    3182

    So they want unmarried women to pay less in taxes. Yeah, that’s a great way to keep the birth rate low in a first-world country. Then, as guys are being taxed more, the most productive men have an incentive to leave, so the country is left with even fewer productive guys.

    We just don't realize life's most significant events while they're happening. Back then, I thought, "Well, there'll be other days". I didn't realize that that was the only day. - "Moonlight" Graham

    #835119
    +6
    NerdTunneler
    NerdTunneler
    Participant

    Well, just change your gender from a man to one of the other 230plus other genders…problem solved…

    I stand with feet apart and let my balls hang free...Manginas dont have balls...See how they stand and sit at the whim of their masters...

    #835120
    +4

    Anonymous
    42

    Right now, I am an honest tax payer even though I get ass raped.

    Not me! Not EVER! I am sick and tired of being ASS F~~~ED for the benefit of those that deserve and earn NOTHING!

    How about them paying me to sit on my ass a CRY? That’s EQUALITY!

    #835124
    +5
    Shaunoz
    shaunoz
    Participant
    512

    The reply is easy for any moron in Australia who thinks women are paid less… “So just tell me the name of the business that is doing that. I will report them. I will campaign against them with you. The fact is – it has been illegal to pay women less for the same job SINCE THE 1970s !!!”…

    Anyone in public sector ( over 20% of the workforce) – paid by government by one way or another — They are not paid any less.

    Anyone on an “award rate”, given that award rates are gender neutral ( about 33% of the workforce) — They are not paid any less.

    So where are these business supposedly paying less ??? They don’t exist. In the rare case that it happens – they are prosecuted. they are fined. and they pay full restitution.

    Women are not paid less.

    About the tax… Only will happen if/when people vote ALP. And as the major parties take it in turns to govern, that will happen. Australia is pretty much f~~~ed. The only question is how quickly the whole place unravels completely.

    If they implement blue/pink tax forms. I will either leave the country permanently or go completely off the grid.

    #835125
    +6

    Anonymous
    1

    Not me! Not EVER

    Same ere, Tower.

    I do contract work and operate as a limited company – I declare that I earn minimum wage and the rest is paid to me through untaxed dividends.

    It’s a loophole and totally legal.

    #835130
    +5
    Shaunoz
    shaunoz
    Participant
    512

    Two thoughts to the f~~~ed-in-the-head SJW’s that come up with these proposals.

    1. MEN PAY MORE TAX. SO – WHEN TAXES ARE CUT. THEY GET MORE BENEFIT FROM THE CUT. They don’t see that. Anyone, male or female, earning $X and therefore paying $Y in tax – GETS THE SAME BENEFIT FROM A CUT.

    SJW’s really give me the s~~~s. They are so utterly devoid of any logic or rational thinking.

    2. IF I say that I ” **identify as** a male-dressing lesbian woman ” I suppose I would get the pink form and thus the lower tax rate?

    #835149
    +3
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    Just become a woman overnight who is transitioning back to a man, problem solved.

    Somedays I just feel like pulling the plug on the internet, and tv, just stick to gaming. Atleast this madness hasn’t found a foothold yet, time will tell, 2020 is fast approaching, isn’t there some agenda 2030 they were trying to ramp up.

    Stay strong brothers.

    Nope.
    Trans have lost, at least in UK: they aren’t going to be allowed to identify as women as they like.
    Tradcucks and feminists won, female privilege is safe, that’s why now they’re beginning to think about a man-tax again.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #835151
    +3

    Anonymous
    1

    At least they will make it official.

    The fact is Men already pay higher taxes than women. Women draw far more benefits from the tax based Welfare programs than Men do.

    This is a form of Tax “Kick-Back” if you will. Men rarely get any benefits from the welfare programs we pay into. Therefore Men already pay higher taxes than women do. You just have to look at the Welfare Systems and ask WHO BENEFITS?

    #835152
    +4
    Branched off
    Branched off
    Participant
    10929

    Frightening. Makes one wonder what the point in trying is when the pitch is already so tilted against us. Makes one think “I will just be a bum then”.

    A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 63 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.