Transgender Military? What could possibly go wrong you misogynist piece of s~~~?

Topic by Yojimbo Rockford

Yojimbo Rockford

Home Forums Political Corner Transgender Military? What could possibly go wrong you misogynist piece of s~~~?

This topic contains 11 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by GregB0  GregB0 2 years, 8 months ago.

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #489110
    +3
    Yojimbo Rockford
    Yojimbo Rockford
    Participant
    348
    #489156
    +5

    Let’s just keep on destroying the effectiveness of the military by removing unit cohesion. These soldiers will be so busy walking on eggshells around their comrades. Will they take bullets for each other? Will they run into the field to carry off a wounded comrade?

    Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

    #489176
    +2
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    How many transgender people are there?

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #489184
    +4
    DaveV
    DaveV
    Participant
    450

    it’s very difficult for me to comment as I don’t understand the concept of transgender. I read the definition in wikipedia, but it seems we now have 20 genders/sexual orientations. I am afraid I grew up only knowing 2 genders, male and female.

    All I can say is, I sometimes have to design offshore living accommodation modules, and it’s really going FUBAR things if I have to put in 20 sets of toilets !

    D. G. I. Don't. Get. Involved. (Be happy, and stress not)

    #489191
    +2
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    Let’s just keep on destroying the effectiveness of the military by removing unit cohesion. These soldiers will be so busy walking on eggshells around their comrades. Will they take bullets for each other? Will they run into the field to carry off a wounded comrade?

    I would love for any of our military brothers to comment on this.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #489224
    +2
    PistolPete
    PistolPete
    Participant
    27143

    That is one of the things I don’t understand about liberals—they claim there are 20+ genders but they want everyone using the same bathroom….WHAT?

    #489317
    +3
    Mr. Smith
    Mr. Smith
    Participant
    686

    Monty Phython already covered this:

    "I need men, real men, men with balls, certainly not sissies. I would never ask them to take an enemy position, but I insist that they follow me to that position. If you are one of those men, raise your hand." Napoleon Bonaparte

    #489335
    +1
    DaveV
    DaveV
    Participant
    450

    That is one of the things I don’t understand about liberals—they claim there are 20+ genders but they want everyone using the same bathroom….WHAT?

    Either that or the women demand separate toilets to all other ‘genders’. I had this problem before on one offshore rig. 20+ year old rig, totally FUBAR, rusting,falling to bits, but I was asked to modify it to put in female toilets and disabled toilets plus ramp…I argued the case that this was stupid and since you could only access the rig by helicopter, and it was normally unmanned. Only the maintenance crew went there for repair every 2-3 months. As for wheelchair access, that was stupid because in the event of an emergency you had to don survival gear, climb down ladders to the sea or jump into it from about 30 ft (the helicopter was 2 hrs away and didn’t hang around). I got reprimanded for being ‘insensitive’, and HR gave me a verbal warning and sent me on ‘sensitivity training’. I can’t think of what would happen if I had to accommodate other genders?

    Whilst I don’t care if women use the men’s room, I think women won’t want to share with blokes. I have no idea what other ‘genders’ think. Seriously this world is going FUBAR.

    D. G. I. Don't. Get. Involved. (Be happy, and stress not)

    #489336
    IRuleMe
    IRuleMe
    Participant

    Let’s just keep on destroying the effectiveness of the military by removing unit cohesion. These soldiers will be so busy walking on eggshells around their comrades. Will they take bullets for each other? Will they run into the field to carry off a wounded comrade?

    Of course not. Their damaged little snowflake psyche will tell them to RUN.

    #489350
    +1
    Tuneout
    Tuneout
    Participant

    At least they have a clause in there that states if it affects the combat readiness.

    YOU THINK??

    DADT was the best policy iMO.Theres no need to be open about anything while on duty.

    Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

    #489734
    +1
    Y_
    Y_
    Participant
    4591

    These liberal retards and have no idea what war is like.

    I confess I have no idea about trannies in the trenches. I am old fashioned. Only a brother standing next to you in the trenches keeps you sane. There is no room for non-male behaviour in the field.

    If they want to serve then form their own trannie unit or female unit and fight that way.

    Don’t f~~~ up male units and get a brother killed.

    #490347
    +2
    GregB0
    GregB0
    Participant

    Another attempt to offer social programming for those who could not make it mainstream. i.e. PVT Manning

    The current non combat arms units are already hosed and almost ineffective.

    ​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

Viewing 12 posts - 1 through 12 (of 12 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.