Topless women in Kitchener/Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

[Crazy CanuckMember 4215]

Three topless women in Kitchener were going topless due to the hot weather.   According to the law they are legally able to do this however the police who spoke with them have claimed they were complaints about them.  You will see a picture where they stop traffic to take a picture of them topless.  This is highly illegal.  Most of these women who went topless to protest aren’t the kind of women I want to see topless.

 

I don’t know if these women are feminists or not however these women are douches.  I had plenty of times biking in very hot weather and not a single time did I feel the need to take my shirt off.  Please women don’t go topless because of you are a f~~~ing eye sore.

 

http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2015/08/01/rally-in-support-of-women-s-right-to-go-topless-set-for-today-in-waterloo-ont_n_7916622.html

"If pussy was a stock it would be plummeting right now because you've flooded the market with it. You're giving it away too easy." - Dave Chapelle

[RennieParticipant]

How that got legalized in the mid 90’s is beyond me, since it runs afoul of the already existing indecent exposure laws on the books. Write em up on the sex offender list.

[Anonymous 1]

These filthy animals don’t deserve to live in a civilized society

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

And if land whales decide to go topless???

The f~~~ing Horror!!

Hope this doesn’t happen, it will spread like the 4 winds, we wont be able to go out in public without gagging to death.

[SlayherParticipant 2074]

Free the Nipple = Attention starved whores.

[sidecarParticipant 35860]

If any of them are under 18 does it count as exploitation or child pornography or something like that? Because I’m thinking it probably should.

[griffinParticipant 189]

personally i don’t see the big deal, let em go topless if they want, who cares really? It’s just t~~~ afterall, seen a pair, ya seen em all.

[sidecarParticipant 35860]

griffin wrote:

personally i don’t see the big deal, let em go topless if they want, who cares really? It’s just t~~~ afterall, seen a pair, ya seen em all.

I’m guessing you’ve never been stuck in traffic behind a line of jackasses all stopping to ogle some bikini charity benefit car wash or the like. Stuff like this has to be worse.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

And they bitch about us men objectifying them?

The mystery has been solved, because they are objectifying themselves out of the ballpark.

griffin wrote:

personally i don’t see the big deal, let em go topless if they want, who cares really? It’s just t~~~ afterall, seen a pair, ya seen em all.

I don’t want to see land whale t~~~, just no.

sidecar wrote:

I’m guessing you’ve never been stuck in traffic behind a line of jackasses all stopping to ogle some bikini charity benefit car wash or the like. Stuff like this has to be worse.

Cluster f~~~ with a whole new meaning.

[griffinParticipant 189]

@sidecar,

actually I lived in Ottawa where that ruling originally took place in the early nineties. I still remember when the hookers thought it was a great idea to “show off their wares” on Montreal rd. And yes, it did stop traffic for a time, but whatever, all in good fun. And I think it was you who said the other day on the ‘Hatred of Women’ thread….indifferent was the word, wasn’t it?…so that’s me….I don’t f~~~ing care.

[griffinParticipant 189]

Phantom wrote:

I don’t want to see land whale t~~~, just no.

neither do i, so i don’t look…

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

What is this weirdness going on?  It has to be said.  I blame Canada!  😛

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[sidecarParticipant 35860]

griffin wrote:

all in good fun.

Montreal traffic is never fun.

And I think it was you who said the other day on the ‘Hatred of Women’ thread….indifferent was the word, wasn’t it?

You’re missing the point. Indifference to women is completely different from not wanting to be stuck in traffic for jackassery.

I don’t care if it’s topless women or those critical mass jerks (and I ride) or whatever, if you f~~~ with my commute you are an asshole, and you need to knock that s~~~ off.

[griffinParticipant 189]

sidecar wrote:

You’re missing the point. Indifference to women is completely different from not wanting to be stuck in traffic for jackassery. I don’t care if it’s topless women or those critical mass jerks (and I ride) or whatever, if you f~~~ with my commute you are an asshole, and you need to knock that s~~~ off.

No I’m not missing the point I was making which is I’m indifferent to whether or not women want to go topless….again, who f~~~ing cares.

Stuck in traffic is a whole other issue, and something f~~~ing with my commute is a regular routine for the most part…but it’s usually something else and not topless women as the cause. Topless women as the cause would at least be refreshing!

[sidecarParticipant 35860]

griffin wrote:

I’m indifferent to whether or not women want to go topless […] Topless women as the cause would at least be refreshing!

If you think it’s “refreshing” you are not indifferent.

[griffinParticipant 189]

no, still indifferent to them going topless…the cause/effects of that is something different altogether…and even then…will probably depend on how nice the rack is-lol

[ironheartParticipant 949]

Rennie wrote:

How that got legalized in the mid 90’s is beyond me, since it runs afoul of the already existing indecent exposure laws on the books. Write em up on the sex offender list.

It was a young feminist who got the newspapers attention, and as was the norm back then the courts bent over backwards to grant women outlet or victory on any complaint they made that they were being oppressed by the evil patriarchy.

As to the modern day, yes the young women who made the federal case out of this park complaint situation are young third generation feminists.  There was an interview on the CBC last week with them, and it was pretty clear what their whole argument was.  They consider standing up against the evil state and bra industry as a victory for the female cause.

This is nothing more then a press corp that feeds the usual feminazi need for attention and public acknowledgement.  Waste of breathing either way you look at it.

 

 

"Women have become so full of hatred that they are blind to reason and humanity. That which they practice will be the end of humanity, long before any war that men may fight.." "Women are predators by nature. Why else do you think they are so quick to gang up and go after a man they hate for showing any sign of weakness?"

[TheBardParticipant 974]

In theory I don’t have a problem with women being able to go shirtless like men, there are 2 problems. Like already mentioned women will try to get attention and cause traffic to back up and most importantly women aren’t logical enough to go topless.  Women demand to go topless like men, but then they will just complain about men looking and checking them out.  We see it now with female characters dressed sexy.  Women don’t know what they want to no good will come of this.  Don’t allow women to go topless and they complain about sexism.  Allow them to go shirtless like men and they will complain about men looking.

[rajshekarParticipant 46]

Filthy women always likes to have attention, if they don’t get it, they do creepy things such as this!

I know looking their faces and ugly makeup, they didn’t get attention , so they decided this vulgarity!

 

“I spent my life trying not to be careless. Women and children can be careless but not men” - Godfather

[Author]

Posts