To Work or Not to Work

[Modern Day WarriorParticipant 499]

There are countless examples of how women have advantages over men. Thank you Captain Obvious. But one of the biggest ones is the fact that women have the option to find someone to take care of them. Men have no such option. Sure, there might be a few exceptions to the rule, but the fact is if you’re a male you might as well just plan on working your ass off your whole life. You have no other alternative.

Women can work their ass off their whole life too if they choose to, but they don’t have to in most cases. We all know about sugar daddies. If you’re a hot chick you can probably find a guy with a lot of money. But even fugly women can hook up with a guy if they really want to. Maybe the guy won’t be rich, but he’ll probably have enough money so that she won’t have to work, or at least not work very much. The term gold digger has a lot of levels to it.

If you’re a guy, what are your chances of finding a woman to take care of you financially? They are virtually nil. Even if you’re the hottest guy on the planet, you are going to be expected to earn a living. If you were able to become a kept man, you would receive absolutely zero respect.

Bitches, by contrast, do this all the time and people don’t even give it a second thought. To appear respectable, they will often pursue something to gloss over the fact that they are prostitutes. So we end up with women claiming to be writers, artists and life coaches. They don’t really produce anything, they just want to claim to have an occupation.

Are you going to work for a living or not? That question only applies to women. Ask a man that question and he’ll look at you like you’re a f~~~ing idiot.

"One must put up barriers to keep oneself intact." - Neil Peart

[Sky-OParticipant 18933]

Beta works, supports a family, pays for the limited pussy access he gets and devotes his entire existence to being a slave.

Whereas a woman that works and/or has money can still find a guy to be a ‘provider’ and take care of her. And he expends his resources and money to do that. While she gets to keep her money. – Not sure if I need to include the Webster’s dictionary definition of the word parasite at this point.

[ghostParticipant]

Modern Day Warrior wrote:

Are you going to work for a living or not? That question only applies to women. Ask a man that question and he’ll look at you like you’re a f~~~ing idiot.

LOL

Sky-O wrote:

Not sure if I need to include the Webster’s dictionary definition of the word parasite at this point.

parasite (noun/pronounciation: par·a·site) – a person who exploits the hospitality of the rich and earns welcome by flattery. (Merriam-Webster)

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

Great post OP. I do know of one kept man, but it didn’t last. Young fella down at my gym when I lived in Kent. Good looking, was a builder, all the muscle etc. In his late 20s.

He got hit on by this extremely wealthy divorcee, also a gym member,
hot for late 40s/early 50s. Anyways he’s smashing her every which way, and of course telling the male changing room about it.

His job took him all over England, she offered to keep him at home, as a breathing dildo of course. Bought him a new Mercedes, holidays all over the globe, designer clothes.

He got bored, his batteries ran out, he missed nights out with his mates banging hot 25 yer olds. He left her, went back to work.

Within a week she was seeing a personal trainer in the same gym.

The builder was a nice lad, thick as a bag of mince, but smart enough to know he was being laughed at by the other guys in the gym.

Men just can’t be kept, its not in our DNA, its why MGTOW and missing husbands are terrifying to women. Men have and can do their own thing, forever has it been thus, think of the Klondike Gold Rush, the mercenary soldiers, adventurers, explorers, all men. Women just can’t compete with the male need for solitude and to test themselves.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Modern Day Warrior wrote:

Men have no such option. Sure, there might be a few exceptions to the rule, but the fact is if you’re a male you might as well just plan on working your ass off your whole life. You have no other alternative.

True, but if you’re not shackled to some woman and her spawn constantly dragging you down into debt, you don’t have to work nearly as hard.

Women may have the option of leaching off some man, but only if they can find one. She may want a host to parasitize, but you don’t have to be it.

Men evolved to be resource providers, and we are much better at it than women ever could be. Men have such a huge surplus of labor that we can provide for a whole family if we put our backs into it. But if we wisely choose to use that labor surplus only for ourselves we can live easier and live better than any woman ever could, even if she chooses to work and she manages to find an increasingly rare chump to suck dry.

So yes, you have to work, but not very hard if you Go Your Own Way.

[ghostParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

So yes, you have to work, but not very hard if you Go Your Own Way.

What if going my own way is to make enough money to lobby Congress to change our laws to create balance in society? What if I want to run for President on the platform of growing our economy again by providing incentive to men again and putting an end to toxic feminism?

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

@gambit: When enough Men Go Their Own Way, lobbying congress won’t be necessary. Congress won’t have a f~~~ing choice.

In the meantime you’ll be working a 30 hour week, taking long vacations, paying minimal taxes, and retiring at 35. Which is much easier. And much more fun.

[bladeParticipant]

Nothing scorched earth pure and utter

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[ghostParticipant]

sidecar wrote:

When enough Men Go Their Own Way, lobbying congress won’t be necessary.

I really hope you’re right brother.

[Author]

Posts