Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › Time to invest
This topic contains 20 replies, has 13 voices, and was last updated by 
Cú Chulainn 2 years, 4 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
“The global sperm-bank business could be worth nearly $5bn by 2025, according to Grand View Research, a market-research firm in California.”
“The fact that the main customers for many sperm banks are now single women explains the marketing technique. “They tend to be highly educated, impatient and picky,””
"Life is really simple, but men insist on making it complicated."
Anonymous6Sperm banks, Egg donor clinics will be big business. I’ve been looking into it. As well as private prisons.
I will never invest in a sperm bank. By the same token I’ll never sell my sperm for any amount of money.
To me, the entire concept of sperm banks is extremely disrespectful and degrading. Allow some unseen, random skank the benefit of my sperm just because she wants to reproduce? Not on your life.
The very idea denigrates men and is a female attempt to sidestep man’s natural and important role of employing his reason, his selectivity and his free will to determine if, when, and under what terms reproduction with his genetic material will be allowed to occur.
Women I choose to allow the privilege can have my sperm shot down their gullets or up their buttholes, but no baby-making unless I say so.
Sell sperm to some whore so she can have a child to torment?
F~~~ that karma.
Anonymous3The single women that resort to banked sperm to mother children do not deserve to reproduce. They are failures, the ultimate losers, the female equivalents of “cucks”, and their genes deserve to be exterminated from the gene pool and nothing less. They are an even bigger cancer than regular single mothers.
Seriously, f~~~ them. A bunch of pieces of s~~~, immoral, irresponsible c~~~s.
Anonymous42I’ve been looking into it. As well as private prisons.
Those places that torture MEN for not YIELDING to the ill mannered and narcissistic will of modern woman? Brother it’s like a turkey helping with thanksgiving dinner! Rethink that one if you have a swinging dick! Profiting from men’s suffering is EXACTLY WHAT MODERN WOMEN DO!
I will never invest in a sperm bank. By the same token I’ll never sell my sperm for any amount of money.
+100000!
To me, the entire concept of sperm banks is extremely disrespectful and degrading. Allow some unseen, random skank the benefit of my sperm just because she wants to reproduce? Not on your life.
BURN YOUR SPERM!
GIVE THEM ABSOLUTELY NOTHING!
GIVE THEM ASHES!
I think that what they really want are clones, but the technology isn’t quite there yet, and the price is too high.
When cloning does become commonly available, sperm banks will go broke as wimmin choose to buy themselves a mini-me – the ultimate in narcissism – instead.
First, the requirements you have to meet in order to donate sperm are ridickulous. Your sperm is categorized base on your appearance, but also on your achievements (because retards think someone with your genes is likely to be able to accomplish what you did). Without being in the top 1% of looks, health, and intelligence, you don’t have much of a chance.
Second, sperm donors can be sued for child support. If you donate anonymously, you receive a much smaller paycheck.
Third, though this is more personal, I’m not interested in having kids unless I can be their father.
Doesn’t sound that great.
Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.
Anonymous3First, the requirements you have to meet in order to donate sperm are ridickulous. Your sperm is categorized base on your appearance, but also on your achievements (because retards think someone with your genes is likely to be able to accomplish what you did). Without being in the top 1% of looks, health, and intelligence, you don’t have much of a chance.
Then a similar test should be applied on women that wish to extract sperm, to make sure they pass the female equivalent of those male requirements: ie 8+/10 in appearance, less than 30 years old, between 5’4′ to 5’8′ in height, good health history, and a moral test.
It’s completely ludicrous that some insane, mental woman with a SMV of ZERO and health problems, who should have been sterilized basically, can just bypass everything and hack the system to acquire the best sperm, when she has absolutely no business carrying and raising ANY CHILD in the first place.
It’s completely ludicrous that some insane, mental woman with a SMV of ZERO and health problems, who should have been sterilized basically, can just bypass everything and hack the system
Completely contrary to nature, and therefore not good for any of the parties involved.
Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.
A few years back I watched a news blip on a donor. The banks pay the guys that donate. So this one collage kid was going around donating. Over all his stats were good- height, weight, build, education. At the end of the report the people figured he must have like 300 children across the country. Which gets into other issues all together. Even went to interview a number of them. Showed photos at the end of the guy on one side and photos of the children on the other.
mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/
Invest in cat food and box wine.
Spend the dividends on motorcycles.
I still think it is very telling that the main users of sperm banks are now single women, rather than couples with problems getting children on their own. Also, the fact that the market sections of these companies have identified their customers so well (“They (women) tend to be highly educated, impatient and picky.”).
Would I ever donate sperm myself? No.
Would I consider investing if I got the opportunity? Why not. If I can make a profit from these women I do not see any moral problem with this. It would be their money into my wallet.
"Life is really simple, but men insist on making it complicated."
Anonymous0sperm donors can be sued for child support.
Really? The main reason why most men sell their sperm is because they’re broke and needed money. I don’t know what women are going to get from suing these broke men!
Today’s women don’t deserve to reproduce. Their genes should be terminated from the planet on a massive scale.
I don’t know what women are going to get from suing these broke men!
They’re going to get another man in prison.
Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.
because retards think someone with your genes is likely to be able to accomplish what you did
Well, that’s kinda how genetics works. Intelligence, behaviour, and aptitude all have heritable aspects.
Is it a coincidence that Archie Manning, a former NFL QB, has not one, but two of his sons following in his footsteps? The third Manning brother, Cooper, would no doubt be there as well if not for an injury.
Screening for good genes is how we compete in the sexual marketplace. Sperm banks are no different.
The answer, is no.
Anonymous3Well, that’s kinda how genetics works. Intelligence, behaviour, and aptitude all have heritable aspects.
Is it a coincidence that Archie Manning, a former NFL QB, has not one, but two of his sons following in his footsteps? The third Manning brother, Cooper, would no doubt be there as well if not for an injury.
Screening for good genes is how we compete in the sexual marketplace. Sperm banks are no different.
Do you think Archie Manning’s sons would have been as successful as they are today if they were conceived via sperm bank and raised by an ugly, mental single mother?
It takes two hands to clap. Genetics works both ways, for both men and women. The problem with sperm banks is, ALL WOMEN can completely bypass competition in the sexual marketplace. Only the quality of sperm is screened, while the quality of the host eggs is ignored. Eggs have always been valuable since the beginning of our species, even low quality ones. A woman would have to have some seriously s~~~ genes or f~~~ up really really badly to have to resort to sperm banks. So if intelligence and behavior are heritable, then by being such f~~~ups, these women have proven themselves more than unfit for reproduction.
The only way for sperm banks to work “correctly”, is to have the women that seek sperm extraction, go through a female equivalent of the test for men to donate sperm. Then there’s still the problem of the child having to grow up under a single mother household. Who in the right mind would raise a bastard kid with some lunatic woman.
Well, that’s kinda how genetics works. Intelligence, behaviour, and aptitude all have heritable aspects.
Is it a coincidence that Archie Manning, a former NFL QB, has not one, but two of his sons following in his footsteps? The third Manning brother, Cooper, would no doubt be there as well if not for an injury.
Screening for good genes is how we compete in the sexual marketplace. Sperm banks are no different.
Do you think Archie Manning’s sons would have been as successful as they are today if they were conceived via sperm bank and raised by an ugly, mental single mother?
It takes two hands to clap. Genetics works both ways, for both men and women. The problem with sperm banks is, ALL WOMEN can completely bypass competition in the sexual marketplace. Only the quality of sperm is screened, while the quality of the host eggs is ignored. Eggs have always been valuable since the beginning of our species, even low quality ones. A woman would have to have some seriously s~~~ genes or f~~~ up really really badly to have to resort to sperm banks. So if intelligence and behavior are heritable, then by being such f~~~ups, these women have proven themselves more than unfit for reproduction.
The only way for sperm banks to work “correctly”, is to have the women that seek sperm extraction, go through a female equivalent of the test for men to donate sperm. Then there’s still the problem of the child having to grow up under a single mother household. Who in the right mind would raise a bastard kid with some lunatic woman.
I agree that genetics isn’t the whole story.
Environment plays an equally important role.
My point was, all things being equal, genes DO matter.
In a sperm bank situation, of course women will pick the best candidates. I’m not saying it’s not f~~~ed up…it is. I’m just saying that if you’re shopping for sperm, then genes are a huge factor.
Your argument that only the men are screened and not the women doesn’t make sense. Sperm banks are not eugenics facilities. Their mandate is not to produce the best quality humans. Their role is to make money.
What is your point? They are customers…they will choose the best quality product at the lowest price.
Capitalism.
I think the women that need this service are f~~~ing losers. They have no shortage of male suitors…obviously there is something seriously wrong with these crones if they need a sperm bank. F~~~ing pathetic.
The answer, is no.
Will spermbanks eventually expand their business to eggs and artificial wombs?
I think if that technology comes to fruition, sperm banks are the ones who will first be jumping on the wagon and try to get part of the market. With access to plenty of single women who are in need of sperm, they already have a considerable donorbase.
Once they have both eggs, sperm and artificial wombs, it is just a matter of time until one can order a baby with a genetic setup to your liking. A thought I find a bit scary tbh.
"Life is really simple, but men insist on making it complicated."
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
