Home › Forums › Philosophy › Thus spoke Zarathustra – Nietzsche
Tagged: Nietzsche
This topic contains 4 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by RoyDal 4 years, 12 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
I’m sure anyone philosophically inclined has read this by now but I want to point out a paragraph that reflects us as MGTOW and raises a serious question:
“Are you one of those who had the right to escape from a yoke? Many a one has cast away his last worth when he has cast away his servitude.
Free <i>from</i> what? What does that matter to Zarathustra! But your fiery eyes should tell me: free <i>for</i> what?
Can you give yourself your own evil and good, and set up your own will as a law over you? Can you be judge for yourself, and avenger of your law?
Terrible is it to be alone with the judge and avenger of one’s own law.”
I think this is the hardest part of MGTOW. Giving our utility and love to women is/was a huge part of our identity. Instead of taking the easy way out where all the answers to our existence lie we have opted to free ourselves but “free for what”. I expect most of you have your own answers now, but I see a lot of the newer MGTOW guys in pain and I remember that pain myself.
We have not cast off a yoke, but rather found a new one in brotherhood as we learn and reach towards a new vision of society.
We have the right to cast off our yokes and the evidence is that many of have done this. But we also have the right to take up a yoke.
I do not agree entirely with Nietzsche, but I do not disagree entirely with him either. If we can decide what is good and evil and that is in our nature, than if we don’t decide then we are going against our nature. To go against our nature leads to deficiency in who/what we are. Would Neitzsche have to view that as evil, since that is the thing he was struggling against?
If I took Neitzche’s advice and decided that my own will was law, then I would be submitting to his idea and essentially his law and not my own. Going even deeper into his argument, has he even come up with the concept of law on his own? Because if he hasn’t then on the micro level he is still obedient to some extent to something outside him, and that is itself the concept of law. The fact that he is making an argument about law only proves law exists on its own terms with its own existence because the law has affected Neitzche enough to submit an argument about it.
Obviously we are free to do and believe what we want. One can simply observe existence and notice that is the case. But does it bring about a fuller existence? Or rather a deficiency?
If we are to find any truth in philosophy, it can not be limited by the men who brought it. The greatest mistake in philosophy is the religious worship of the philosopher or philosophy. Observation, in its purest and simplest form, is the most important thing.
Nietzsche has my undying respect especially for his way how he dealt with “academia”/intellige-whores. Its because they have done exactly what you describe – they took science and seeking of Truth in general and perverted it to Religion/Evil.
God (the real one/not a human) created LIFE not religion. Its actualy pretty staggering how much effort “civlization”/hell will go through in order to deny the fact that you cant lie to the “thing”/being that is essentialy your source for everything real. By denying the real power and constantly pretending and lying you get what we have now in this world.
Nietzsche had a great way of putting it and this book is just The one that anybody should at least try to read. At least twice. Once for start and secondly after you digest it and live it a bit.
I am currently wrestling with myself similar to this at the moment. I have acknowledged that I am Sisyphus and ultimately all that’s matters to me is myself and what I choose to do with this life, yet I am not sure what to do with it yet. So many paths are at my disposal.
Every moment of every day I am compelled to choose. I must choose what to do and how to do it (even breathing for example). I must choose how to deal with the outcomes of my prior acts, and I must choose how to deal with circumstances beyond my control.
Alternately, I can surrender to my established habits or the demands of others. This is also a choice in the strict sense: It is the choice to let others run my life.
So, it looks like I’m in broad agreement with Nietzsche.
Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678