Thoughts on bachelor tax

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

I want to share such thought:
A bachelor tax would be practically impossible to enforce.
Why?
Because, if it would be gender neutral, it would hurt even women: that’s unthinkable in our gynocentric society.
Because, if it would be just only against men (and that’s very hard to enforce), then, necessarly, gays would be excluded, and it would be enough for every man, in order to avoid it, to take the membership of an LGBT association.

Just my two cents.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[OgreParticipant 5863]

I see them as memories of a by-gone era, for all the reasons you mentioned. Don’t think for a second that the gays would factor in though, male and unattached would be enough.

That being said, all of the old ways of making single men pay more are already built into the inflated tax scale for single persons, at least in the U.S.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[TuneoutParticipant]

Ogre wrote:

I see them as memories of a by-gone era, for all the reasons you mentioned. Don’t think for a second that the gays would factor in though, male and unattached would be enough.

That being said, all of the old ways of making single men pay more are already built into the inflated tax scale for single persons, at least in the U.S.

Exactly,come income tax time,if you are not a visible minority and/or have no dependants,the gov’t figures you can shoulder more tax burden.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Married men get tax break that single men don’t have, so you indirectly pay the bachelor tax.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[OldBillParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

A bachelor tax would be practically impossible to enforce.

An overt bachelor tax is a near impossibility and, as you note, practically unenforceable.

That being said, covert bachelor taxes already exist and will increase in number. Health insurance rates are covert bachelor taxes, especially “Oboingo-care”.

In fact, all government taxes have a bachelor tax or male tax component. A recent study in New Zealand showed that men pay more taxes to receive less in government spending/support than women do. It’s when men are over 85 years of age that they receive more from the government than they pay for. Women, however, pay less and receive more every day of their lives.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22578]

Ogre wrote:

I see them as memories of a by-gone era, for all the reasons you mentioned. Don’t think for a second that the gays would factor in though, male and unattached would be enough.

That being said, all of the old ways of making single men pay more are already built into the inflated tax scale for single persons, at least in the U.S.

And let us take a look at us and other modern men.

We consider it a plus just to be out of debt. Must of us men do not have much money. Women and foreigners are given all the breaks and opportunities. If we have a job it is just temporary, part time. And it will be eventually given to a foreigner or woman in some way. Yet, women, government, foreigners, all demand we pay for everything with our dwindling resources.

A bachelor tax cannot work in this era because women are taught to only marry “mister perfect” which do not exist, while women are taught to hate men that do not meet their standards.

We men are being punished for situations out of our control.

We are being cut off at both ends. Any bachelor tax would push us beyond the point of no return. Where there would be no point in obeying the rules.

[KimmurielParticipant 480]

Impossible to enforce? You estimate the double-think and parasitic lifestyle that have now become socially-politically normal.

Their nature does not reflect unless to see themselves in the mirror. An inch becomes a mile and our global withdrawal isnt being taken lightly.

Aka keep your Jim Brown stiff arm strong

"You meet a few exceedingly forsaken, Sit around the cooler refusing domestication" Aesop Rock

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

It is taking the surplus of a man’s labor

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

OldBill wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

A bachelor tax would be practically impossible to enforce.

An overt bachelor tax is a near impossibility and, as you note, practically unenforceable.

That being said, covert bachelor taxes already exist and will increase in number. Health insurance rates are covert bachelor taxes, especially “Oboingo-care”.

In fact, all government taxes have a bachelor tax or male tax component. A recent study in New Zealand showed that men pay more taxes to receive less in government spending/support than women do. It’s when men are over 85 years of age that they receive more from the government than they pay for. Women, however, pay less and receive more every day of their lives.

I agree, but you’re missing the main point.
A bachelor tax is meant to force men to return to plantation.
That’s why it have to be overt.
As long as taxes on single men are covert, the desired effect isn’t achievable.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[TattooDaveParticipant 6952]

The IRS has since its Inception been used as a branch of government that is unseen to most people. Congress can legislate morality through its tax laws. Give this a thought. They wouldn’t actually be taxing men they would be texting any unmarried person. Oh believe me women could get married in a heartbeat if they wanted to avoid the tax whereas men are not going to be able to avoid that as readily. You see it’s more a policy of encroachment by inches. The IRS in other words carries out the governmental idea of home ownership by allowing a deduction. This could just as easily be taken away and since the IRS seems to be in much need of reform if not outright abolishment it could happen along with many other laws that are not even currently being enforced. When we start speaking of tax code my ears pick up……

You can try and legislate morality just use the IRS

I can see their heads have been twisted and fed with worthless foam from the mouth. Bob d

[TattooDaveParticipant 6952]

So how hard would it be to push that marginal rate just a little bit higher how many people really take notice

I can see their heads have been twisted and fed with worthless foam from the mouth. Bob d

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Women receive preferential benefits and opportunities.

As OldBill said, men are taxed already to support women.

Our justice system is anything but equal. But who cares? We probably won’t change it in our lifetime. I say enjoy life and don’t worry about it.

I personally would gladly pay a bachelor tax in order to remain free.
The bachelor tax would be far cheaper than giving everything you own to some lady.

[OldBillParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

I agree, but you’re missing the main point.

I very much agree, but I wanted to emphasize the long game being played here because the long game is the only one that works.

A bachelor tax is meant to force men to return to plantation. That’s why it have to be overt.

Such taxes have never had the desired effect, even in high social dominance states Classical Rome or Communist Romania.

As long as taxes on single men are covert, the desired effect isn’t achievable.

The desired effect isn’t achieved, but the desired result is.

Ask yourself why women and their allies want men back on the plantation. It’s so they can strip men of their time, labor, and assets. Covert taxes, indeed taxes of all kinds, strip men of time, labor, and assets whether those men are on the plantation or not.

As the marriage rate plummets, as the number of single mothers increases, we’re going to see the number of covert bachelor taxes explode and those taxes are going to be structured in such a way that single women will not be effected at all.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Anonymous 3]

Prefer Peace to Piece wrote:

Women receive preferential benefits and opportunities.

As OldBill said, men are taxed already to support women.

Our justice system is anything but equal. But who cares? We probably won’t change it in our lifetime. I say enjoy life and don’t worry about it.

This is all true, and I’ll tell you one other thing, it is this way because MEN want it to be this way.

If men just decided tomorrow they didn’t want to be taxed and treated as second class citizens, there isn’t a think anyone could do about it. It would just stop, overnight.

I’ve never in my life seen women, by themselves, be able to do one thing on their own. They can not force a man to do anything that he doesn’t want to do.

Men WANT to pay these taxes and WANT women to have all these benefits. The vast majority of men will FIGHT to give women these advantages.

The second men aren’t doing that, then women don’t get these things and won’t even ask for them, because the remaining men won’t tolerate it and women badly need men’s protection and resources.

Any time you have large government, it becomes gynocentric. Any time you don’t have government, male value skyrockets. Historically there was little to no government for most people in most parts of the world. Women were considered completely worthless, and fathers would pay a dowry to unload the “useless eater” that is a daughter. Only the very wealthy could support their daughters, but even then they valued their sons and that’s how strength was measured, the number of sons you had.

But our modern world is very unnatural and very contrived. It takes from men as a whole, and men willingly agree and want this, to pander to women.

Nothing will happen in OUR lifetimes because ultimately it’s easier as a man to ghost and still have an easy life. That’s essentially what I do. I purposely choose not to allow women into my life. Other men insist on dealing with women and even having families, so they have to follow the social rules in place. It’s really not that bad though, food is easy to get, we have power, lots of modern comforts. Why would I have an issue with any of this?

But if the government starts dropping all of these comforts, then suddenly men aren’t going to be so willing to go hungry just so a woman he doesn’t know can be comfortable. That’s kind of where the rubber meets the road. It’s not happening now, but if it starts, that’s when government collapses, because very few men are willing to suffer and die without fighting back. That’s also why food stamps and the like exist. Bread and circuses really.

[sidecarParticipant 35860]

Eric Lauder wrote:

A bachelor tax would be practically impossible to enforce.
Why?
Because, if it would be gender neutral, it would hurt even women: that’s unthinkable in our gynocentric society.

Obamacare is already a bachelor tax. They just don’t call it that.

So is the income tax.

Any tax on productivity, such as the income tax, is a man tax because men are the producers. And when you throw in a whole lot of exemptions for things like being married and having wife and child dependents it becomes a bachelor tax.

[ComputernerdParticipant 465]

sidecar wrote:

Any tax on productivity, such as the income tax, is a man tax because men are the producers.

This. All taxes that take from your labor are bachelor taxes. They may not outright say it, but the politicians as well as most of the extremely wealthy know taxes are only directed towards men.

You’d have to an ignorant dumbass not to know taxes such as income tax are directed towards single and rich men. Most married women don’t work that much if it all and if they do it’s just the easy low paying desk jobs. It’s the same with single women.

Most wealthy (I might even say ALL wealthy women here) only got their wealth because someone gave it to them when they put in no effort at all to earn it. They either got their wealth from divorces or inheritance.

And all poor women are just too f~~~ing lazy to make enough income to where it would hinder their lifestyles or salaries at all. Poor women only work the easy low paying min wage jobs.

In the western world at least, taxes that take away from your labor are only directed towards men. They just can’t outright call them bachelor taxes because the government has to at least pretend they’re for “equal rights.”

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

if tax on maxi pads is considered discriminatory, so will a bachelor tax. i don’t think it will happen.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Author]

Posts