This is why it’s stupid to be an MRA

[SilentParticipant 303]

If feminists were for equal rights they wouldn’t have tried to shut down this event. This is why I don’t give a f~~~ about what happens to any government or activist group anymore. I’m just gonna ghost it and stay invisible as far as men’s rights are concerned.

The reason I’m posting this is because I know some MGTOW dabble in the MRA as well. Your time is better off spent doing things you want to do instead of trying to fight feminists.

Feminists can’t be reasoned with at all.

This is also why I try to not go out during big election events such as the current one happening in the U.S. with the presidential candidates. Feminists are usually more vocal during these times.

[experiencedParticipant]

Yes. Agreed. Just walk.

When the “stock” of men’s rights goes down 50%, how much does it have to increase to return to where it started?
That’s right, 100%. It’s not going to happen.

Choose your battles. Choose your winning move.
“The only winning move is not to play.”

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Tiga KParticipant 1693]

I agree that much of their efforts are futile but I appreciate what they try to do. In a way we compliment each other. The MRA can serve as a means to a man discovering Mgtow and Mgtow can be used by the MRA as an example of why people need to listen to them.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

If guys were protesting a feminazi conference THE FREAKING POLICE WOULD RUSH TO BEAT UP AND ARREST THE GUYS.

Women can do anything they want, lie, cheat, steal, destroy and they get away from it because…

Wait for it…

VAGINA!!!

The only option is not the play the game.

Turn on, tune in and drop out.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

I’ve noticed that some MRAs still have a leash on from their wives. Better to go MGTOW than MRA.

[SilentParticipant 303]

MRAs are also a bit gynocentric, because most of them are tradcons and let women infest their work as well.

If you go MGTOW, you don’t have that problem and you can just do your own thing.

[AttonParticipant]

Ask yourself this have you ever seen a group of MRA’s act like that.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 42]

MRA’s bog themselves down in feminazi’s mud getting all covered in s~~~!

MGTOW come in like an arctic wind, freezing the mud, then driving over it with a snowmobile laughing all the way!

[experiencedParticipant]

First Amendment, The Right To Assembly.”

No LAYDEEZ, Not regarding IKEA.

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[KeymasterKeymaster]

experienced wrote:

“The only winning move is not to play.”

Until MRAs teach prevention, they are softies – playing nice and negotiating with terrorists.

I can understand “fighting for rights” to self-preservation and making sure you don’t get destroyed in divorce. But when you think about it, what they are arguing for? It’s not even a PLUS!! It’s not even a benefit. All that energy, effort, focus and waste is like negotiating with a gun maker that you don’t want to die if you play with guns.

• “Hey Mr. Blackjack dealer. Can we work out a deal so I don’t go broke from playing cards?”
• “Hey MacDonalds. I want to make sure I don’t get fat from eating your food.”
• “Hey Marlborough. I am fighting for the right to not die of lung cancer. I’ll take a carton of reds.”

experienced wrote:

“The only winning move is not to play.”

… is right.

Man’s right #1: “Never f~~~ing sign a marriage contract, ya dumb s~~~”.
• You have the right not to eat MacDonald’s.
• You have the right not to gamble.
• You have the right to not smoke.
You don’t even need to lift a finger or attend a single meeting.

When there’s nothing in it for them…. what the f~~~ are they talking about it for?

When your the sex that builds and maintains civilizations, your non-participation is discussion enough.
Let THEM fumble about and figure it out.

Listen to this bitch. “I have NO IDEA WHY MEN ARE REFUSING TO MARRY NOW MORE THAN EVER!!!“

—

Yeah you do, bitch. And you’re DIVORCED. And she’s like “I’d really like to be married”. Not buying it. Had your chance and already f~~~ed it up. Not really interested in your f~~~ing opinion. You’re a FAILURE at marriage. You know EXACTLY why men are refusing to sign marriage contracts. YOU are the goddam REASON!

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[WhackerGuy2030Participant 999]

Somehow the glyphosate concept popped into my head when thinking about this. If you’re not aware, glyphosate used to be a weed killer that wiped out anything that was green. It used to be 100% effective. It worked by blocking the uptake of water and nutrients to weeds and effectively starved them to death.

I can’t help but see a common thread here. The only way to deal with the feminists and this entire mess is a full blown strike. Nothing will change until the whole gyno system is starved out. As long as there are blue pill men feeding the beast, the problem will remain.

I’m with Silent. It aint’ my fight. I’m not going to spend my life p~~~ing in the wind. I’m jumping right to the nuclear option. I’m on strike, and happier for it.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

I can’t see the video where I am but I’m assuming it’s a bunch of women disrupting a peaceful discussion in a university or something. This is perfect and the MRA should absolutely continue. What the MRA are doing is what’s called passive resistance and it is unstoppable. The more rights the feminists violate, the less support they get, except from the extremists and very crazy, which makes them look worse. The more feminists try to violently and illegally stop men AND women from gathering to have peaceful discussion, the more they look like the British did in India. The more they look like the whites who hosed down peacefully protesting blacks during the Martin Luther King era. This is perfect and these idiots are playing right into the MRA’s hands.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[SilentParticipant 303]

@survivor

Oh, I’m against the MRAs, but being an MRA is a wasted effort. It’s like trying to convince every man to go celibate and use sex toys. It’s not gonna happen.

I admire their efforts, but like Keymaster said, they’re not fighting for anything that I want.

[SilentParticipant 303]

@survivor

Nope, I don’t care about fairer family law. I feel bad for the men who get screwed over because of those laws, but it’ll never affect me directly. It won’t serve me any benefit either because I’m never gonna have kids or get married.

I condemn hope a lot. To me, hope is for the weak. If you want something done, get it done yourself. Hope is just being lazy in my eyes.

And I agree, the MRA does do good things. But, they mainly do good for white knight tradcons. They don’t benefit me in the least.

[SilentParticipant 303]

@survivor

I know right? I’m awesome. The thing about being MGTOW is that I don’t have to give a s~~~ about activist groups or what they do. It makes my life that much more enjoyable.

[WhackerGuy2030Participant 999]

I can’t help but think this is irreversable at this point:

[Frank V.Participant 2445]

Since most MRAs I saw where defending “Traditional Marriage” / Traditionalism, I got disinterested pretty quickly.

As my Uncle used to say “You can’t go back.”

We can’t go back to the “Leave it to Beaver” 1950’s.
We can’t go back to the “Good Old Days” of before WWII.
We can’t go back to the past.

Sometimes you simply have to turn the page and go forward. That means if Marriage is something a forward thinking and risk adverse man is going to engage in, then we need something for the 21st century, not the 19th.

Marriage is rigged against men. Instead of “fixing it”, men should simply not do it. In fact, it seems the “Marriage Strike” and MGTOW, for the relatively small numbers of men who think of themselves this way, are having far more impact.

A MGTOW doesn’t fight for a “reformed plantation” (in the words of a Black MGTOW friend of mine), he simply gets up an leaves it.

Instead of fighting whackadoodle Feminism, MGTOW benefits by moving on. Every “#wastinghistime2016”, moronic demonstration or fit of attacking men acts as recruitment for MGTOW.

KeyMaster is great, I got a lot of love for the guy. But right now, to steal KM’s words, Feminism’s insanity is MGTOW’s best asset. The more they push men around, the more they push them away and to MGTOW.

If every every MGTOW contributed all they could, we could never hire a firm to promote and recruit for MGTOW as effective as Big Red and all the lunatic fringe feminists are.

If they are so damned determined to win men to our side and even a few women to our sympathy, why should we stop them ?

Frank V.

[Anonymous 42]

Don’t ya need RIGHTS first before you can have an association? It should be MWRA, Men Without Rights Association!
It’s long past time to walk away and let these modern dynamics of law and female gender preference to s~~~ the bed!

F~~~ it all! Time to LIVE!

[MattNYCParticipant 2329]

Silent wrote:
@survivor

Nope, I don’t care about fairer family law. I feel bad for the men who get screwed over because of those laws, but it’ll never affect me directly. It won’t serve me any benefit either because I’m never gonna have kids or get married.

I condemn hope a lot. To me, hope is for the weak. If you want something done, get it done yourself. Hope is just being lazy in my eyes.

And I agree, the MRA does do good things. But, they mainly do good for white knight tradcons. They don’t benefit me in the least.
It’s so cool to not care, even when people are doing good things for other men, f~~~ them if ain’t about you. Such a boss attitude.

Morality is the set of attitudes and behaviors that facilitate voluntary, cooperative, and mutually beneficial relationships.

I’m struggling to figure out where the balance point should be, if that makes sense.

I don’t have or want children, and i’ll never get married again. So in that sense men’s rights doesn’t have a big, direct impact on my life.

On the other hand, my best friend and one of my brothers both have children. I’d hate to seem them run through the family court grinder.

I can appreciate working towards/having a level playing field for men who choose to go the marriage/children route. But for me? It’s a black hole man. I don’t know if it can be salvaged. Even if it can, at what cost-benefit to me?

Honest question. I don’t have an answer. Just looking for others’ opinions.

[Author]

Posts