Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › This is what a feminist looks like —> Loser.
This topic contains 12 replies, has 10 voices, and was last updated by Solid Snake 4 years, 9 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Anonymous25This is what a feminist looks like – basically a loser.
Nick Clegg and Ed Milliband both face a defeat in UK elections. They lose. A feminist looks like a loser. They both pandered after feminist vote by wearing a feminist t-shirt:
The winner was David Cameron who refused to wear such a t-shirt.
Let that be a lesson that by pandering to feminism politicians lose.
This is a victory for men irrespective of immediate policies. Politicians only goal is to get re-elected and politicians will surely notice this and stop pandering to feminists.
Here’s a big hint about politics: The representatives are NOT the people with real power. That’s why they’re called “representatives.”
Women are used to getting things for free — and who better to offer free stuff to women than a politician, who gets to make OTHER PEOPLE pay for his gifts?
The truth is that pandering to women in western culture is a winning political strategy.
Representative democratic politics, really, is a female game. Manipulation, backbiting, complete abdication of responsibility.
How do you think women have gone from being “oppressed” to controlling the U.S. in less than a century? Because politics is a game they play very, very well.
Anonymous11I would not be caught dead wearing a shirt like that. They are manginas.
“Because politics is a game they play very, very well.” They are wired for lying, and manipulation in a way men aren’t, Obama excluded.
This is what a feminist looks like:
I don’t know how much of an ally to men that Cameron is. There are plenty of despicable misandrists in British politics and misandric policies in Britain. But I do believe there is diminishing tolerance within the general public for feminist cultural Marxism, feminist lies, entitlement, and hatred.
[Quote] Representative democratic politics, really, is a female game. Manipulation, backbiting, complete abdication of responsibility. How do you think women have gone from being “oppressed” to controlling the U.S. in less than a century? Because politics is a game they play very, very well. [/quote].
I’m going to use this. Misandrist: “What do you call a woman with the morals of a man? A slut.” Me: “What do you call a man with the morals of a woman? A politician.”
A woman with the morals of a man is a NAWALT. A man with the morals of a woman is Grima Wormtongue.
King of the Sea, that is the elegance of politics. It is s~~~ for men, but if you are a broad, a more perfect system couldn’t have been dreamed up. Despite the fact that it has been men who have created it, but all within a gynocentric culture that demands male disposability for the benefit of women.
Women don’t even have to sit in government, as men have put their interests front and centre regardless, because it is women, then children first. However we know children, mostly boys, are thrown under the bus without any hesitation.
How else could you legalize misandry?
F~~~ing patriarchy. Another feminist lie.
Yeah, I understand that. Turd Flinging Monkey did a great video about how the welfare state has come about in every country immediately following women being given the right to vote; blew my mind.
Great news that these two pansies have been kicked out of politics.
It’s unfortunate though that for every feminist and mangina kicked out of office there are another ten waiting in the wings. I bet my bottom dollar that the politically correct Labour and Liberal Democrat parties both choose new leaders that are either toxic feminists or pandering manginas.
E=MC² Bitch
I would not be caught dead wearing a shirt like that. They are manginas.
Maybe. If I saw you wearing that shirt, I’d do you a solid and put you out of your misery.
Its all the rage here in Australia is pandering to feminism too, I’m heavily involved in one of the major political parties and its just a vote winning scheme, really no one gives a f~~~ about it to be honest on a political level but its an easy vote winner as its a common ‘issue’ in the media, someone who panders to that crowd wins the emotional vote.
I wouldn’t put their loss down to pandering to feminism, if anything they would have won a fair amount of votes out of it since we all know how popular feminism and ‘feministas’ are in todays society, they would have lost out on other policy or Rupert Murdock’s pull over the populace, if he and his media sides against a political party, they’re toast.
You’ve got your “rusted-ons” who will only vote for their particular major party they align with which make up a huge amount but then there is a percentage of swinging voters who can be swayed and those people are the ones who decide the outcome of elections.
When you’re in these situations you’ve gotta blend in and run with it, toe the party line or you’re on the outside.
Same deal with workplace situation really I think.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678