This Accidental Experiment Shows The Superiority Of Patriarchy

[Gone SurfingParticipant 216]

I came across this gem on my internet travels.

For those who can’t be bothered to read it i’ll do a brief summery – a dutch reality tv show put group of 12 men and 12 women on to different islands.

The men built huts fished, foraged and created fire. The women fought, sunbathed and ate all their supplies. In the end the show had to put 3 men on the womens island to help them out.

Enjoy.

http://www.returnofkings.com/32053/this-accidental-experiment-shows-the-superiority-of-patriarchy

[DazzleParticipant 67]

It mind boggling what must go through these women’s heads! I mean I know it’s a TV show and they can walk out whenever they want, but it’s a f~~~ing survival show they signed up for. I watched a similar thing on a documentary channel over Christmas, can’t remember the name of it, but it’s about putting a man and woman, naked in some far away place. The same thing happened (surprise, surprise!). Both of them were struggling, but the guy never gave up and as things were not bad enough he also had to put up with her s~~~ty moaning and moods swings. Of coarse she walk off the show and with that lazy super bitch off his back, he went on to survive quite happily on his own.

[Anonymous 42]

When I was a kid in the 6th grade we had a field trip to Forest-Park spfld, MA. It was called ECOS. A survival and nature outing in the woods of F-P. Well let me tell you what you already know. “All” the girls made nothing and stood around in a “group” chatting, while the “teacher”(hint)”hen-house” built their survival lean-to. The boys paired off in several different groups in different denominations ranging from 2 to 5 boys in each group. The boys built their sites according to vantage points they selected, I remember two of them found a large hollow tree and used that, other forts were on a steep hill side where the boys used branches from a newly fallen pine tree. We see this pattern over and over again………………………………………………………..

[John DoeParticipant 743]

Take away a woman’s right to motherhood and they end up reverting to what they never could have.  Having children is the only way a woman matures, and that is not even guaranteed to work.

[jambearParticipant 282]

This article is book marked. I know that this is just a TV show and not sure how staged all of this was but god damn, this was a horrible showing for dutch women at least. Given the chance to rise up and show us men how civilization is done, even if it was on a small scale they failed hard. It just goes to show the priorities of modern woman, I say modern because if you stuck 12 woman from 100 years ago on an island I have no doubt in my mind that they would have been fine. The modern female like modern man has lost the ability to survive by the skin of their own brow, but the key difference between the two is that modern man is able to at least suss out what needs to be done and can experiment until they are able to get it to work.

Seriously who the f~~~ sunbathes and lounges around worrying who is in charge when your food stuffs are nearly gone? Please for the love of god someone make this make sense to me!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-1168182/Catfights-handbags-tears-toilets-When-producer-launched-women-TV-company-thought-shed-kissed-goodbye-conflict-.html

Someone posted this in the comments of the article you linked. It is from Daily Mail so take it with a handful of salt but it compliments what you posted.

 

[TheBardParticipant 974]

This was great. I would love to see how feminists would say the patriarchy was keeping those women on the island down lol.

<cite>@dazzle said:</cite>
I watched a similar thing on a documentary channel over Christmas, can’t remember the name of it, but it’s about putting a man and woman, naked in some far away place. The same thing happened (surprise, surprise!). Both of them were struggling, but the guy never gave up and as things were not bad enough he also had to put up with her s~~~ty moaning and moods swings. Of coarse she walk off the show and with that lazy super bitch off his back, he went on to survive quite happily on his own.

Naked and Afraid is the name of the show I think you are thinking of.

[Anonymous 5]

This is absolutely hilarious. I read the comments from that article and the guys made a lot of excellent points.

One women even admitted she was a former feminist but changed later on in life when she realized it was all bulls~~~. Here is her post:

EDIT: Nevermind. Argh. It posted a bunch of gibberish when I tried to cut/paste it.

[AntaresParticipant 208]

While the title of the article is “Shows the superiority of the Patriarchy” I think this in fact shows the opposite. As men, we look at the scenario and say “Look what the men accomplished, while the women did nothing” so the men “win”, but lets look at what actually happened here.

After the situation looked dire, the TV producers took 3 men from the man’s group and exchanged them with 3 women from the women’s group. The three women in the man’s group see all the wonderful things the men have already accomplished and go back to sunbathing. The 3 men in the women’s group see the women haven’t done a damn thing, then proceed to be worked like dogs getting things up to par, while the women again do nothing. So tell me, who is better off?

Price is what you pay, value is what you get. -- Ben Graham

[GoneGaltParticipant 361]

Antares: good point. I was thinking along the same lines, but that the women knew they were not in a real survival situation and that once they ate all their food they would be rescued by the show producers in some manner, because after all the producers are probably men and would be vilified for allowing any woman to come to harm.

But the question is not really “who is better off” – the real question is “who were able to provide for women so that they were better off”? Meaning, this is a classic example of women targeting men for resource acquisition, and in so doing (if even passively by becoming mindless parasites and eating all of their food) exhibited their real weapon: manipulation of the male species. First, by getting the producers to change the conditions of the experiment to one in which their manipulative skills would be able to work (useless on a female-only island) and second by directly manipulating the men whether or not the women were in the majority.

Finally, everyone involved knew it was a show but I can guarantee you that in an actual survival situation on an island that the modern women would perish and the men would be the ones to be “better off”, assuming that fishing and foraging on both islands were sufficient to sustain indefinitely the lives of the group, and that drinking water was not a limiting factor. Women’s primary values is that of sex and reproduction with respect to men, but men can simply rub one out, or engage in homosexuality if that’s what they want, without damaging their ability to survive. And I suspect that’s exactly what that converted feminist realized.

Before ever coming to the MGTOW philosophy I have long argued that all this feminist crap would disappear in an instant in a major disaster or the collapse of civilization because it was only the efforts of man that shielded woman from the harsh realities of life and allowed her to imagine herself superior. What good is that hot looking female in high heels and a designer dress when a meteor impact has laid waste to her country and simple self-preservation is the only immediate goal on everyone’s mind, and when her usual form of trade (prostitution) for resources doesn’t work any longer because men no longer see a utility in her in producing children with food in short supply? Her only utility will be measured to the extent of her usefulness in providing resources (hunting and/or gathering), exactly like men’s utility is now by women.

[Anonymous 5]

But when it comes to survival. Women are dead. Simple as that. If a nuke or war started in North America on our own home soil, I promise you women/children hide in the basement and men get the food for survival. Women/Children are too weak and useless. That is why they relay on men to do the hardwork. We are the guys who build things like guns, shelters, clothes etc.

Patriarchy is the right way of life. It makes sense. Once we start listening to being 100% equal, then guess what happens? Men tell the children/women to f~~~ off while we take the life boats from the sinking ship. Why should the strong man die when the weak can die easier?

Tired of this equality bulls~~~. Men are superior. Deal with it. Know your role in life.

[JohnnyWayneParticipant 70]

@john Doe: Rather than growing up when they have children, virtually every woman I know actually first tried to revert back into childhood herself. They pull the “single mother” card as a way to manipulate dependency onto the family, the father and the government. Then when this isn’t enough, she’ll try to become wholly dependent on another man. If this fails, she’ll hit up the churches and the charities, and the “clothes for kids” programs, and the “Angel Tree” programs, and the section 8 housing program , and the list goes on and on.
In essence, I’ve seen them do anything and EVERYTHING to avoid growing up and accepting personal responsibility.

[Author]

Posts