This Accidental Experiment Shows The Superiority Of Patriarchy (A good read)

Topic by Enjoy The Decline

Enjoy The Decline

Home Forums MGTOW Central This Accidental Experiment Shows The Superiority Of Patriarchy (A good read)

This topic contains 8 replies, has 9 voices, and was last updated by Dr. Sable  Dr. Sable 3 years, 8 months ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #236582
    +4
    Enjoy The Decline
    Enjoy The Decline
    Participant
    1719

    Link


    Patriarchy has been extremely successful, despite its recent vilification. Most cultures worldwide are patriarchal – to find examples of successful matriarchal societies you either have to turn to ancient history, remote outskirts of the world or feminist fiction. However, this hasn’t stopped the feminist collective from queefing out books and even a hashtag hailing the end of patriarchy in a textbook example of incestuous amplification.

    What patriarchy, after its apparent downfall, will be replaced with remains to be seen. Hamsterizations aside, there is surprisingly little data available about what life would be like in a society made up of only men or only women. An enterprising social scientist might want to perform an experiment where groups of men and groups of women are left to their own devices, having to work together to survive against the elements and build a civilization from scratch. However, this scientist would have a very hard time convincing ethical review boards that the inevitable suffering of his participants would weight up against the value of the data.

    Luckily, reality television is not bound by ethical constraints and once in a while, in its never ending quest for viewer ratings, reality TV accidentally performs a very interesting experiment that social scientists would never be allowed to do.

    Quite a few years ago, I had the pleasure of watching the Dutch version of Survivor (Expeditie Robinson) with my feminist roommate. That particular season would have two islands, one populated by men and one populated by women. My roommate had been promoting that particular series to me and the other students in the house for weeks because it would show us, according to her, what a society run by women – free from the evils of patriarchy – would be like.

    And it did. Oh it did.

    Here is what happened: initially both groups were dropped on their respective islands, given some supplies to get started and left to fend for themselves. In both groups there was some initial squabbling as people tried to figure out a local hierarchy. The men pretty much did whatever they felt was necessary – there was no leader giving orders. Men who felt like hunting, foraging or fishing did so. Another guy decided he was fed up with sitting on sand and started making benches. Others built a hut that gradually grew and evolved. Another guy cooked every night. Within days a neat little civilization was thriving, each day being slightly more prosperous than the previous one.

    The women settled into a routine as well. The hung up a clothesline to dry their towels, then proceeded to sunbathe and squabble. Because unlike men, women were unable to do anything without consensus of the whole group. And because it was a group of at least a dozen women, consensus was never reached. During the next few episodes, the women ate all their initial supplies, got drenched by tropical storms several times, were eaten alive by sand fleas and were generally miserable. The men on the other hand, were quite content. There were disagreements of course, but they were generally resolved.

    Eventually, the people running the program decided something had to change. In order to help the women out, three men would be selected to go to their island. In return, three women would take their place at the men’s island. The look on my feminist roommates face during this episode was priceless.

    Initially, the three men selected for the women’s island were ecstatic, for obvious reason. But then they arrived at the island and were greeted by the women.

    ‘Where is your hut?’, they asked.

    ‘We have no hut’

    ‘Where are your supplies?’ they asked, dismayed

    ‘We ate all the rice’

    And so on. The three men ended up working like dogs, using all the skills developed by trial and error in their first few weeks – building a hut, fish, trying to get the women to forage. The women continued to bitch and sunbathe. The three women who were sent to the men’s island were delighted – food, shelter and plenty of male attention was freely available. They too continued to sunbathe.

    And that my friends, is what patriarchy is. My former roommate, unsurprisingly, is no longer a feminist.

    Now this might all be a fluke, a white raven, an exceptional case not representative of society as whole. But that particular season of Dutch Survivor is not unique. CBS broadcast several Survivor seasons in the US, where men and women started off in separate groups. In most cases (the Amazon and One World), the result was the same. The men quickly got their act together, getting access to food, fire and shelter while the women spent a lot of time and energy on petty little squabbles, eating their meager supplies, getting drenched in storms and generally being pathetic. The opposite situation, where men didn’t get their act together while women quickly built a functional micro society, has not yet been observed outside of feminist fiction, and it probably never will.

    "Question everything" - Albert Einstein

    #236621
    +2
    Nerevar
    Nerevar
    Participant
    8040

    No matter how many times this is article brought up: I love reading it 😀

    "One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

    #236644
    +1
    Alchemist
    alchemist
    Participant
    484

    wow… WOW, that is f~~~ing brilliant. Excellent vindication.

    I vote to sticky this thread.

    #236655
    +3
    K
    Hitman
    Participant

    Shows the fact feminists are actually suicidal. .if they ever achieve their ultimate goal in destroying men,left to themselves they will perish.
    Deep down they know this, and want bad.
    They are politically diseased.
    Their agenda is death. .men..children and ultimately themselves.

    #236659
    +5
    Lurch
    Lurch
    Participant
    3866

    Eventually, the people running the program decided something had to change. In order to help the women out, three men would be selected to go to their island. In return, three women would take their place at the men’s island.

    That was a mistake, sacrificing three men to save a bunch of women, spiraling into oblivion.

    If I was in charge of production, I would have kept the populations as is and take it to the extreme. Lets see how far down the rabbit hole we go in how women suffer without men.

    Once it got to the point that the women would be in medical peril, only then would I give them the option to leave the island and exit the show. This would turn the show into a gender wars, last person… **cough** man **cough**… standing competition and further enforce the fact that men don’t need women, but by god women need us men!

    Blue-Pill Virgin: Women hate me! That's what it is.
    MGTOW Man: Hate them back; it works for me.

    #236705
    +3
    Jan Sobieski
    Jan Sobieski
    Participant
    28791

    I like the shows and the topic.

    However, there is no patriarchy.

    From the internet:

    a system of society or government in which men hold the power (for solely being men , my addition) and women are largely excluded from it.

    That means Obama is president solely based upon his gender. Not that he got more votes or raised more money. Since a female could and will someday be president, we are not a patriarchy.

    The Roman Catholic Church is a patriarchy. Only men can lead.

    The USA is not a patriarchy. There is no patriarchy.

    We are something between a republic and an oligarchy with a little plutocarcy thrown in.

    Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

    #236745
    +1
    Big Boss
    Big Boss
    Participant
    4496

    This article so much.

    And to think, we are supposed to suspend beliefs with goylebuster and think that they are going to create ghostbusting equipment, like retarded pistols, and gauntlets and some retarded submachine gun.

    Instead of what we all know of women and run for the f~~~ing hills screaming their head off who can’t even f~~~ing kill roaches, mice, rats, snakes and spiders and scream like they are getting murdered.

    #237274
    Oz-Bloke
    Oz-Bloke
    Participant
    3233

    This resonates with my experience. Everywhere I go I see men building, designing, inventing, mining, repairing, creating. Every few weeks groups of men turn around and see the house, bridge, invention they built from honest hard graft while all I ever seem to see women do is talk, type, enter stuff on spreadsheets, talk, Facebook, sunbathe, hold meetings, text, breed, makeup, complain about the patriarchy, selfie, make PowerPoints, talk, bake, talk, shop and … VAGINA. Being stuck on an island of only women would be HELL, regardless of all the sex they would want at the peak of their fertility cycles.

    #ManOut

    #237346
    Dr. Sable
    Dr. Sable
    Participant
    1064

    What the majority of those shows failed to disclose was the fact that once the males had improved
    the female camps, females turn on them and started isolating and marginalizing the men that aided
    those same women.
    So it proved that a micro cosm can be established where human nature can be observed, studied and
    used as fairly good measure of how humans react in a regular environment.
    Not good for strong independent femms eh ?

    Zero Tolerance

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.