They're Tweaking Tinder to Help Women have More Control

[Anonymous 1]

“The dating app will launch a setting that makes it possible for women to only interact with the men they message first. ”

To be clear, I’m not on Tinder, never plan to be, and this will affect my life in NO way.

I just thought I would share yet another example of how princesses need to be given help dealing with all of us knuckle-dragging predators.

LinkToArticleHere

[Anonymous 54]

Anonymous wrote:

“The dating app will launch a setting that makes it possible for women to only interact with the men they message first. ”

This goes with my role reversal theory. They want men to be passive, bitches the agressors.

[Anonymous 12]

They have done similar with OKCupid. But the problem is how many women will ever bother making the first move? They thrive on attention.

[TheSpiceParticipant 2644]

Anonymous wrote:

This goes with my role reversal theory. They want men to be passive, bitches the agressors.

Which is why it’s nice to tell ’em to f~~~ off.

That tinder s~~~ just can’t be good for civilization can it?

"I've been thinking about what it would be like if we got back together."
"You know it's too late for that."

[FragmentedParticipant 2758]

Haha what a pathetic sight. A bunch of women searching for a sucker in that top 20% window, and most of them will never get one. They’ll just keep riding different c~~~s every week until they hit the wall, and then ask “where did all the good men go”?

http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[HermitParticipant 1121]

If I used Tinder I would be very upset.

I don't hate women. I just feel better when they're not around.

[LionOnTheLooseParticipant 1315]

Anonymous wrote:

But the problem is how many women will ever bother making the first move? They thrive on attention.

Exactly: the irony of this is that women still expect to do nothing, to have guys running around after them. A lot of women proudly put on their Tinder profile that they won’t message first. In my experience, it’s a favourite hobby of women to complain about all the messages they get from “creepy guys”. It’s just part of this massive contradiction with women today: they want a “strong man” but squeal “#metoo” if someone looks at them.

Little do they know that, not long from now, men will invent robots who are physically indistinguishable from women to provide all the love, care, support, sex and domestic assistance which real women used to give us. Men will build incubators to grow their sons in. They will harvest eggs from unborn female foetuses before disposing of them, so we will be able to reproduce without the need for any actual women. Women will become entirely obsolete. This is the future which women are creating for themselves! (I’m being a bit tongue in cheek, but I do think it’s interesting to think where we are heading with all this.)

There aren't holes in your pockets. It's called marriage.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Ha, that’ll never work. If a man doesn’t make the first move, nothing happens.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[SwimcatParticipant 3599]

Of course I’m in my sixties, but I don’t not know a single man, young or old, that is enrolled in any of those online dating garbage, or least none that would admit it. Who the hell in his right mind bothers with that s~~~.

[AttonParticipant]

Tinder is just Prostitution.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[black_knightParticipant 2602]

In a way, that puts men in a powerful position because women will now know what it feels like to be ignored and rejected, and women don’t like that, and may not use Tinder. So Tinder signals its virtues, simultaneously sparking its downfall.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

haha just make yourself more isolated women. No one will care.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[hmskl’dParticipant 6414]

The only tinder I know .. are the kindling pieces used to light the wood stove.

[Anonymous 12]

black_knight wrote:

In a way, that puts men in a powerful position because women will now know what it feels like to be ignored and rejected, and women don’t like that, and may not use Tinder. So Tinder signals its virtues, simultaneously sparking its downfall.

My thoughts exactly. They may ignore the men they don’t like but they do like the attention all the same.

LionOnTheLoose wrote:

Morlock wrote:

But the problem is how many women will ever bother making the first move? They thrive on attention.

Exactly: the irony of this is that women still expect to do nothing, to have guys running around after them. A lot of women proudly put on their Tinder profile that they won’t message first. In my experience, it’s a favourite hobby of women to complain about all the messages they get from “creepy guys”. It’s just part of this massive contradiction with women today: they want a “strong man” but squeal “#metoo” if someone looks at them.

Little do they know that, not long from now, men will invent robots who are physically indistinguishable from women to provide all the love, care, support, sex and domestic assistance which real women used to give us. Men will build incubators to grow their sons in. They will harvest eggs from unborn female foetuses before disposing of them, so we will be able to reproduce without the need for any actual women. Women will become entirely obsolete. This is the future which women are creating for themselves! (I’m being a bit tongue in cheek, but I do think it’s interesting to think where we are heading with all this.)

Sex bots already exist!! I have noticed of late that MGTOW type attitudes are growing and women are getting very panicky!

[bagsofsandParticipant 1391]

Holy f~~~, Tinder getting even more gynocentric – who would’ve thought?

I’ve posted before that Tinder hates men (their paying customers) and treats women like snowflakes that definitely should be protected against all the awful douchebags.


This is amazing news! Now Tinder is going to treat men EVEN MORE like scum that should not be allowed to make any decisions that little miss cupcake doesn’t 110% approve of.

This is definitely going to yield more matches with fun, spontaneous dates to follow…. (NOT!)

So let me get this straight though: Now Tinder is going to become even more a narcissistic s~~~show with women getting a chance to talk to the 5% of the pool (the good looking Chads or Emilios) while they finger themselves from Chad’s advances. The remaining 95% of men can go f~~~ themselves (as well).

Swimcat wrote:

Of course I’m in my sixties, but I don’t not know a single man, young or old, that is enrolled in any of those online dating garbage, or least none that would admit it. Who the hell in his right mind bothers with that s~~~.

You’d be surprised. Since Tinder is so easy to use I think ALOT of men (single and married) are using it in hope for easy pu$$y. How else could Tinder get away with their obvious misandric behaviour, and still have men pay for “superlikes”, “boosts” and monthly subscriptions.. Supposedly 50 million people use this s~~~ every month (2014), and they currently have 3 million paying subscribers. Just how many of those are men? THERE’S NO STATS TO BE FOUND ON THAT. I’m sure MOST of these ARE men – poor suckers!

This is a step in the right direction though. Let’s have Tinder pull some more stunts:

1. Maybe REQUIRE that ALL men pay a premium fee for even downloading the s~~~?

2. How about REQUIRE that in order to confirm a match (not guaranteeing a date) the man has to pay the woman $20 upfront, so cupcake doesn’t waste her precious time talking to something she might or might not approve of.

[Space CowboyParticipant 1466]

No problem. Will make thirsty beta ego boosts dry up and women will suffer and panic. Sure chads will be swamped even more by the women but that was bad enough already. Keep giving women power and they will f~~~ themselves up faster.

Where are the good men? Tinder but they’re invisible to women and cannot message them.

"Have you ever thought about any real freedoms? Freedom from the opinions of others...even from the opinions of yourself?"

[Won'tGetFooledAgainParticipant 3293]

What they really need is a filter so that unless you are in the top 20% your message gets instantly deleted.

All that is going to happen is that men not in the top 20% are going to get so few messages that they will soon lose interest in this rubbish.

Once again proving that no matter how fat or ugly a woman is she still thinks she deserves a top 20% male.

For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.

[Branched offParticipant 10985]

I know nothing of Tinder but the article makes a good point. Both parties have to swype right before they can message.
So she swiped right and wants a conversation with him right?
But now it looks like she doesn’t?
Why did she choose him if she didn’t want to talk to him?

Oh hell I don’t get it but then its probably female logic anyway.

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[MonkParticipant 17050]

My heart bleeds for all those thirsty simps.

[SwimcatParticipant 3599]

Guys that put themselves out there on this bulls~~~ deserve any ridicule that comes their way. What the hell do you expect?

[Author]

Posts