Thee Years in Jail for Internet Comments

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

I passed by this story in /pol/.

https://au.news.yahoo.com/a/31877395/sydney-man-who-degraded-female-tinder-user-on-facebook-faces-three-years-behind-bars/#page1

Zane Alchin, 25, pleaded guilty and was charged with using a carrier service to menace, harass or cause offence after he allegedly wrote a series of degrading comments directed towards Olivia Melville after her Tinder profile was shared online by another man Chris Hall.

He previously denied the offence but changed his plea on Monday at Newtown Court, in Sydney.

The comment was prompted from a lyric in Ms Melville’s Tinder bio from rapper Drake’s hit song Only, reading: “Type of girl that will suck you dry and then eat some lunch with you”.

Mr Hall posted a screenshot from Ms Melville’s profile to his own Facebook account and wrote next to it “Stay classy ladies. I’m surprised she’d still be hungry for lunch”.

Mr Alchin will be sentenced on July 29 and faces up to three years in jail.

Here is some of the banter. More of them are presented in the article. Hopefully this isn’t fake.

What is going on in Australia? First the AMZ Bank thing, and now this? I feel better day by day knowing that I’m not on social media. I was on the Daily Mail’s version of this story and it had a bunch of feminists saying that he deserved the jail time, but I look at this conversation and I see something that isn’t actually a rape threat. It seems to be another c~~~ blowing things out of proportion. It was a mistake to engage with them.

Does anyone have any other ideas on this?

[KeymasterKeymaster]

The Moth Attracted to the Flame wrote:

It was a mistake to engage with them.

That, and being on Facebook in the first place.

The Moth Attracted to the Flame wrote:

I see something that isn’t actually a rape threat.

Of course it isn’t because he negated it and said “I WOULDN”T” in the same sentence. Amazing how her eyesight failed before she reached the end of the sentence.

The Moth Attracted to the Flame wrote:

I don’t know what to make of this, guys

There’s nothing to make of it. It’s feminists who “made something out of it”, because that’s what feminists DO.

CREATE F~~~ING PROBLEMS.

They actually think it’s acceptable to slander and defame on dont-date-him-girl-dot-com …. when a date doesn’t call again or she gets dumped. “IF I CAN”T HAVE HIM NOBODY CAN!!!”. That’s a woman for you.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RennieParticipant]

It’s like the Griffin book of dating. Even if you didn’t do anything illegal, it will still ensure that you can’t participate anymore.

How lovely…

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9541]

That makes no sense. He acts like an asshole online and goes to jail for 3 years? If everyone who acted like a s~~~head online were sentenced to jail, the jails would be even more crowded. The internet is loaded with sites where people are true jerks.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

That makes no sense. He acts like an asshole online and goes to jail for 3 years?

Freedom of Speech as a Constitutional right only exists in the United States, not in other parts of the world, such as the British Commonwealths. People tend to forget that.

[RennieParticipant]

“…where you will learn to know your role and shut your damn mouth!”

The end statement of end statements.

Paloma is stupid.

[ChuddoxParticipant 585]

Well, we should start a collection for commissary money for this guy, that’s epic lol.

Jokes aside. That’s some stupid s~~~.

using a carrier service to menace, harass or cause offence

So it is illegal in Austrailia to “Cause offense”? Sweet, We should all file charges en masse against every known member of the feminist movement on social media for “causing offense”

“Civilized men are more discourteous than savages because they know they can be impolite without having their skulls split, as a general thing.” - Robert E. Howard

[UnicronParticipant 752]

Freedom of Speech as a Constitutional right only exists in the United States, not in other parts of the world, such as the British Commonwealths. People tend to forget that.

Yep, The British courts are always jailing people for politically incorrect internet posts. (An average of two a week)

Marriage is the process of finding out what kind of man your wife would have preferred.

[ResidentEvil7Participant 9541]

Faust For Science wrote:

ResidentEvil7 wrote:

That makes no sense. He acts like an asshole online and goes to jail for 3 years?

Freedom of Speech as a Constitutional right only exists in the United States, not in other parts of the world, such as the British Commonwealths. People tend to forget that.

Yeah, well, the only people in America that would love to jail people for opposing speech are the liberal-progressive Left wing. They don’t believe in freedom of speech either unless it comes from their filthy sewers.

https://themanszone.webs.com/

[Author]

Posts