The "women are better than men" parade

[– Deleted on Request –Spectator 936]

KeyMaster:

 

Look at the mating tactics of females of other species.  It’s all about getting the male to give up his sperm, after which she no longer has any use for her.

 

[DayrepSpectator 69]

Anonymous wrote:

<div class=”d4p-bbt-quote-title”>Dayrep wrote:</div>
I’m still a little taken aback by how much ignoring seems to p~~~ them off. I’m in disbelief actually.

Try it. You’ll get one of two results one being a raging stalking banshee from hell. The other one is that she’ll try even harder to get your attention. This means nothing though as if you show her some attention she’ll pull away after being satisfied with the validation of being the center again. Either way you’ll know your answer exactly where you truly stand. She is rendered irrelevant as far as you’re concerned. Very occasionally, it’ll get one to be actually really more into you. Walking away is one of our most effective weapons. Either way, you’ll win.

Wow that was SPOT ON! I always knew this to be true but never paid any attention to it.

 

It always p~~~ed me off to see how they pull away after I give them my attention. I mean WTF? And the way they try to get my attention p~~~es me off even more because it’s something so illogical, wrongly insulting and dangerous that I just NEED to correct it, especially in public. It’s almost like a trap.

 

Any tips?

[DayrepSpectator 69]

sidecar wrote:

The “women are better than men” paradeRecent Forum Replies

It’s not true. Far from it. 93% of communication is non-verbal, which mostly includes body language and tonality. Like I said earlier, women give mixed and weird signals which men actually have to pay attention to if we want to understand what she’s saying (usually not worth it). Women also talk in an unclear manner, say one thing and mean/want the exact. They are indirect about a huge number of things. This is enough to say that women suck at communication. It probably boils down to their low self-esteem and manipulative nature.

Keymaster wrote:

The “women are better than men” paradeRecent Forum Replies

LOL. I had so much fun reading that! You’re absolutely right. They expect men to fall down to their level and it’s sad to see how men in society are trained to do just that. It’s funny how women are sitting on a man made civilization and brag on about how they are smarter.

 

Also notice how Michelle Obama got away with saying that but if her hubby said the same thing he would probably be impeached for sexism.

[DybbukParticipant 182]

93% of communication is non-verbal, which mostly includes body language and tonality.

Sounds familiar…study David DeAngelo’s stuff much?

[DayrepSpectator 69]

Dybbuk wrote:

93% of communication is non-verbal, which mostly includes body language and tonality.

Sounds familiar…study David DeAngelo’s stuff much?

Not at all. Who’s he?

[DybbukParticipant 182]

Not at all. Who’s he?

Another guy who repeats the “93%” figure without questioning it. I looked it up…it’s based on one dubious study done a long time ago, and I believe it only measures the communication of feelings, not information.

That’s not to say non-verbals aren’t important. They are. But I don’t think you can really put an accurate number on it.

 

[DayrepSpectator 69]

Dybbuk wrote:

Not at all. Who’s he?

Another guy who repeats the “93%” figure without questioning it. I looked it up…it’s based on one dubious study done a long time ago, and I believe it only measures the communication of feelings, not information. That’s not to say non-verbals aren’t important. They are. But I don’t think you can really put an accurate number on it.

I agree, but I still think that most communication is non-verbal and I think that it would be around 75% at least.

[DybbukParticipant 182]

I agree, but I still think that most communication is non-verbal and I think that it would be around 75% at least.

I’d say it depends a lot on the context, and what communication is valuable in that context. If you’re in a routine business meeting, probably 95% of the worthwhile communication is verbal. Maybe you also learn via non-verbals that the boss is sad and wishes he were on the beach instead of in the office, and that the boss’s assistant has no self-esteem, but that’s probably irrelevant to you.

DeAngelo quotes the 93% in the context of attracting women. He implies that 93% of the communication that affects a woman’s attraction to a man are non-verbal. That’s much closer to believable, but again it depends on the specific situation. A woman could learn a lot about whether a guy has his act together by voice tone and body language, but she might learn a lot more if she hears verbally that he still sleeps with a teddy bear and has a restraining order against him.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

I remember this 93% figure very clearly too. The interpretation has been skewed slightly here. The 93% / 7% ratio is more specifically about TYPED words – and “words” in general. I believe the original declaration was “words are only 7% of communication”…. and 93% is not what you say, but HOW you say it (tone of voice and body language) which makes all the difference. But that ratio has also been debunked.

http://ubiquity.acm.org/article.cfm?id=2043156

No matter what the actual ratio is, it’s worth considering. For example, I was watching Chris Rock’s HBO special and only listened to the “words”. If you were to write them down and read them, what he says is not funny at all. Women in the audience are screaming with laughter and have tears running down their faces. But type them out here, and they would receive it as misogyny and “hate speech”.

Women however will twist and reinterpret words at least 90% of the time, so the statement has merit. For her, it’s all about plausible deniability and they revert to sarcasm constantly – overusing it to an OBSCENE amount. It’s also how they backpedal.

Take a woman seriously and corner her in a confrontation and she pushes the panic button: “OMG LIGHTEN UP !!! I WAS JUST KIDDING!!! YOU TAKE EVERYTHING SO SERIOUSLY!!!! I WAS BEING SARCASTIC!!!” and when you don’t take her seriously, she says: “YOU NEED TO LEARN TO RESPECT WOMEN!!!”

This is how women will always switch on a dime, flip the interpretation around to suit them, and maintain this “women are better than men” nonsense no matter what the cost — and they will even believe it. They are a mass of inconsistency.

Here’s an example. Whether they are free to roam around naked – or you tell them to cover up – they are ALWAYS going to have a problem with it.

This is where the “you can’t beat woman in an argument” statement comes from. He says “It’s impossible, You cannot beat a woman in an argument. Men are handicapped when it comes to arguing.” – which sounds like a huge compliment to women. Of course the female audience immediately begins cheering and applauding because they think it makes them “smarter”. But then , he completely shoots it down with: “…..because men have a need to MAKE SENSE“. And now the female M.O. is exposed, and they aren’t laughing anymore. The MEN are.

“Women don’t argue to make sense. They aren’t going to let a little thing like sense f~~~ up their arguments.
Because they aren’t in it for sense. They are in it for distance — and irritation.”

She just flips the script whenever it suits her…. and when you finally snap, she believes she “won” and thinks she is “smarter”.

They aren’t “smarter” (or better) at all.
They will just SAY ANYTHING – without limits – in order to think they are.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

I maybe should have explained a little better than I did when I wrote that women are better at nonverbal communication. It was based on an observation made (not by me and apologies for not being able to reference the source) that when a baby was crying or upset about something, women were able to figure out (hungry, thirsty, tired, scared, etc) what the baby was crying about more efficiently than men were able to figure it out. The significance is historical. For most of the evolutionary period in which the genders adapted to specific roles, the infant mortality rate was likely to be somewhere between 20-40%. Being about to figure out the needs of a child not old enough to verbalize them did have an impact on survival of the species.

The other thing that made important the ability of women to communicate was that, being the parent who spent the most time in direct contact with the child, the ability of the child to learn to speak by mimicking the sounds he heard from the adult speakers around him was dependent on the quantity of those spoken sounds. The average female speaks four or five times the number of words per day as the average male. Learning to speak by mimicking the sounds of speech is more efficient if you have 4 or 5 times more of those sounds available on which to practice.

None of this means that the quality, accuracy, validity or honesty of that speech was/is ever guaranteed…especially not recently, and especially not to us…only that the quantity was useful at a time when infant survival was much less certain than technology has made it today. Regardless, these were essential skills of motherhood, back when women actually valued that role and took it seriously. Today, if they don’t abort their children during pregnancy, they are likely to abandon them shortly thereafter to strangers in a day care center so that they can be freed up to go pretend to be men having a career.

A court system that allows them to abandon all the responsibilities of being a wife in addition to most of the responsibilities of being a mother (while still rewarding them with the confiscated benefits of having a husband) has allowed them to be the a class of people not responsible to their children, their husbands, and less and less responsible for themselves.

The naturally evolved skills they do have are being wasted, while the standards for roles they don’t have the skills for are being lowered so that they can be ‘equally’ represented.

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[DayrepSpectator 69]

@keymaster I have seen that video about 5 times. It’s pretty spot on but doesn’t cover the fact that women have inferior reasoning skills and that they are complete bitches during arguments that attempt emotional manipulation. Not surprisingly.

 

I have seen that “lighten up, it was a joke” response many times. It is not only deceptive, it’s also got some “anger shaming” in it. This is why I never call out women on their bulls~~~…. it’s just so useless and they know exactly what they are doing. Plus with society completely in their favour, I don’t want to get into any trouble. Especially with other men.

[DayrepSpectator 69]

BrainPilot wrote:

I maybe should have explained a little better than I did when I wrote that women are better at nonverbal communication. It was based on an observation made (not by me and apologies for not being able to reference the source) that when a baby was crying or upset about something, women were able to figure out (hungry, thirsty, tired, scared, etc) what the baby was crying about more efficiently than men were able to figure it out. The significance is historical. For most of the evolutionary period in which the genders adapted to specific roles, the infant mortality rate was likely to be somewhere between 20-40%. Being about to figure out the needs of a child not old enough to verbalize them did have an impact on survival of the species. The other thing that made important the ability of women to communicate was that, being the parent who spent the most time in direct contact with the child, the ability of the child to learn to speak by mimicking the sounds he heard from the adult speakers around him was dependent on the quantity of those spoken sounds. The average female speaks four or five times the number of words per day as the average male. Learning to speak by mimicking the sounds of speech is more efficient if you have 4 or 5 times more of those sounds available on which to practice. None of this means that the quality, accuracy, validity or honesty of that speech was/is ever guaranteed…especially not recently, and especially not to us…only that the quantity was useful at a time when infant survival was much less certain than technology has made it today. Regardless, these were essential skills of motherhood, back when women actually valued that role and took it seriously. Today, if they don’t abort their children during pregnancy, they are likely to abandon them shortly thereafter to strangers in a day care center so that they can be freed up to go pretend to be men having a career. A court system that allows them to abandon all the responsibilities of being a wife in addition to most of the responsibilities of being a mother (while still rewarding them with the confiscated benefits of having a husband) has allowed them to be the a class of people not responsible to their children, their husbands, and less and less responsible for themselves. The naturally evolved skills they do have are being wasted, while the standards for roles they don’t have the skills for are being lowered so that they can be ‘equally’ represented.

 

That makes women better at reading emotions, and yes this is documented fact. However non-verbal communication mainly includes body language and tonality, something men are far better at. Better is subjective, because imo better means to be able to convey a message effectively and clearly. Women have a hard time doing this. However, if by better you mean better at deceiving the other, then yes women are better at non-verbal communication.

 

As far as the women talking more is concerned, it is a myth that was probably spread by feminists. Not surprisingly, it isn’t backed up by any facts! XD Scientific research has instead shown that men and women speak roughly the same amount of words in a day (about 15-16000). I’m including a link below. Interestingly, men have a greater spectrum just like in IQ scores. This means that some men talk very little while other talk a TON. Women are not at the extremes again. The million dollar question is why?

 

http://jezebel.com/5986026/the-whole-women-talk-more-than-men-thing-is-a-myth

 

Also, I’d like to add that women are pretty s~~~ at raising children just like they are at everything else. Children from households without dads are 5 times more likely to commit suicide, 32 more times likely to run away, 20 times more likely to have behavioral problems and 14 times more likely to commit rape to name a few problems. Motherless homes do not have the same problems, though I cannot provide any statistics for that. What does this tell us about women? I dream of the day that divorce courts will realize the nature of women and see what they are doing to children.

 

Hitler was raised by a single mother. Just saying.

[sidecarParticipant 35862]

Dayrep wrote:

93% of communication is non-verbal, which mostly includes body language and tonality.

But 100% of communication of things that actually matter is verbal.  Or written.  Again, try explaining something important like the nature of cholera and methods for purifying drinking water using just tone and body language.

You know what else is good at non-verbal communication?  Monkeys.  Because non-verbal communication is all they have.  One of the things that makes humans, well, human is our modified hyoid bone that allows for speech (along with a whole slew of other adaptations).  Apes and monkeys don’t have it, so in a very real sense, it’s verbal communication that separates men from the beasts.  So when women try to promote their supposed skills at non-verbal communication they are essentially glorifying regression to the animal state in order to reach a level where they can “excel”.

It’s sad, really.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Women are also far more likely than men to make emotionally-based decisions and everyone knows that’s a bad idea.

• You don’t sign a lease on a dare,
• you don’t race some asshole because he calls you “chicken”
• You don’t sell a stock just because it drops 10%
• and you don’t sign a marriage contract because it “feels like you’re in love”.

All stupid emotionally-based decisions. And it doesn’t make women “better” at responding to emotions. They will twist anything into making them “better” or “smarter” ….. but is a man “better” when he shows anger? Is a man revered when he strongly objects – even when totally justified? If showing and responding emotionally is better…. why are men told “you’re just being overly emotional right now” right before we are accused of “not being in touch with our emotions”?

It’s all bulls~~~.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[DayrepSpectator 69]

Keymaster wrote:

Women are also far more likely than men to make emotionally-based decisions and everyone knows that’s a bad idea. • You don’t sign a lease on a dare, • you don’t race some asshole because he calls you “chicken” • You don’t sell a stock just because it drops 10% • and you don’t sign a marriage contract because it “feels like you’re in love”. All stupid emotionally-based decisions. And it doesn’t make women “better” at responding to emotions. They will twist anything into making them “better” or “smarter” ….. but is a man “better” when he shows anger? Is a man revered when he strongly objects – even when totally justified? If showing and responding emotionally is better….

Wow. That just blew my mind. LOL. Thanks for this, KeyMaster. Anger shaming is something that used to make my blood boil. Because I thought of women has human beings like me. I thought she actually cared about why I was angry but she really didn’t and would actually do everything to p~~~ me off then shame me. Ofcourse, by doing this she had the opportunity to play my victim, which is a classic manipulation tactic. But now she has the “angry male” stereotype of gynocentric society to which she can attach us and belittle us even further, causing her to “win” the argument or whatever.

Women being more emotional is another gynocentric myth. The truth is that they are cold as f~~~. Their laughter and smiles are fake. Their crying is fake. They always pretend to be sad/weak/upset just to get a guys attention.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

Agreed dayrep. Laughing, crying, talking, dressing, makeup… all currency in women’s economy of attention.

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[Author]

Posts