The Vagina Bonus

[Anonymous 0]

Hi Brothers,

today I have question to you, especially to the MGTOWs outside Germany, wich has to do with women and work.

In Germany there is a tumultuous discussion about an equal ranking of women in all working areas. I say equal ranking not equal rights. This means that in every working space up to 50% employees must be manned (womanned, lol) by a women, yes the vacancies MUST be filled by women.
Meanwhile they are called statutory women or token women. I prefer to call them VBF – Vagina Bonus Female.

Are there the same discussions or implementation in other countries, e.g. USA or Canada ?

In the german government services it is already implemented. They also have offices with employees which are called equal ranking commissioners, mostly women 99,99% or more, who are supervising that the equal ranking will be enforced. The free economy hesitates and there are parties who refuse this kind of equal ranking.
Studies have shown that it is impossible to fill 50% of all vacancies in Germany with women, because there are to many women which are not enough qualified to do the work and there are not enough women who want these jobs.

So, some Feminist-Lunatics here created the idea to intensify the equal ranking in this way, that a woman has to do the job independently if she has the qualification or not, if she wants the job or if she wants it not. Great, hä !!!

On the other hand men must have the qualification, if not they will also not get the job. Can you imagine what this means to the free economy or to the working environment in general ? They set up a vagina bonus to the women, places them in job positions which they cannot handle, get well paid for this kind of non qualified work (sorry, not so well paid, I forgot the gender pay gap, lol) and men have to qualify themselves furthermore to get a god job, if they don’t the get kicked in the b~~~~.

If this policy will be enforced, I tell you the whole german economic will crash. By the way, Germany is after China the biggest country of exportation.

Let me give an example.

At the Olympic Games there is a discipline in which you have to run 5000 meters. Everyone who has qualified is waiting at the starting line to hear the bang, then the running starts. Equal rights in society mean according to this example, that men and women are standing at this line, and everyone of the runners have the same starting terms and the same running terms. The one who is reaching the target line first is the winner, thats it.

How about this example when we are looking at equal ranking ? That means all men, only MEN, have first to qualify that they will get allowed to go to the starting line, waiting there, then BANG, and run.
The women have not to qualify, the just not even have to run. They will be set to the target line immediately without any kind of qualification and efforts.
Hey, would you men go to the starting line and run ? Without ME !!!
I need a beer now, or two or more.

Here is an example from a german energy company which tried the equal ranking and did not choose a well qualified engineer, instead they choose an obviosly not so qualified woman, of course she has a diploma in mechanical engineering and nuclear power engineering, so far to the official presentation of the company.

The energy company started a simulation (for god sake, just a simulation) to calm down a nuclear reactor and bring it back into a secure status. The time to do this takes normally 30 to a maximum of 60 minutes. The lady was not able to calm down the reactor not even after two hours, so the examiners decided to end the simulation.The examiners complained also about the extensive lack of communication between her and the staff. (I thought women are so high communicatve, we men can only grunt and fart, all clear?).
At last the company and the provincial government came to the decision that the token woman has not the ability and the qualification for this job, hence she did not get it, for god sake !!!
CHEERS !!!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

(Deutsch is zufallig meine ertse Sprache als Kind)

If you think it’s expensive to hire a professional, wait until you hire an amateur. Or a woman.

Unless women are “equally” lining up to take the garbage to the dump, fight fires, get dirty and dig ditches, fix potholes in roads, crawl into sewers… then there can be no such thing as “equal ranking” for women. ONLY IN THE LAST 40/50 years have women started thinking they can “compete” with men.

After MEN did all the building of civilzations, MEN really could have used female labor back when going to work was DANGEROUS. But now that everything is built, water is installed, electricity is harnessed and you can buy ready-made meals anywhere, women suddenly think they are “equal’and deserve to be running the show 50% of the time?? You gotta be f~~~ing kidding me. They will be directly responsible for running businesses into the GROUND.

There is all kinds of “affirmative action” in place, and women have been given a figurative leg-up in EVERY conceivable way, but it’s still MEN who are inventing the internet and all kinds of modern day marvels. And while it may be openly spoken in Germany, it’s generally not directly spoken here, but clearly understood.

We do not hire women. A woman came into our business selling something, and she said “lots of testosterone in here” when she looked around an noticed all of us were MEN. She thought she was being funny, but she was throwing a jab by her tone of voice as if to say “Jesus Christ why are there no women here?”

So I made a “joke” back. Except I wasn’t joking:

Yeah, well. A penny saved is a woman fired. It’s really true!

She practically RAN out of there.

••••••••••

I was contracted for +1 year at a female run privately-owned college as a consultant 2 days a week. The place was CRAWLING with women all posing and walking around stuffing their fat ankles into these trashy Kardashian-like shoes with the 3 inch soles. Hoofs like this:

Clunk, clunk, clunk, clunk was all they did, Gossiping and yacking on the phone. 3 guys did ALL the work. No exaggeration. It was a total wasps nest, but I love it because it was the PERFECT example of a Matriarchy which I could observe from the INSIDE. When I needed one of them to look at the people signing up online for a program and confirm the leads were reporting, she was too f~~~ing lazy to log in and give me a list of the last 5 people who signed up. This would take her 60 seconds. Paid for an entire day, and unwilling to assist the business unless I reminded her 2 days later that the job is not “done” until SHE confirms it – even though the job WAS done. BY ME. I had to stand over her and insist she did it while I wait. This kind of behavior is unbelievable and RAMPANT. You won’t have to look far at all.

When I left, THEN they realized what the work was worth, because nobody else could do it!
Affirmative action doesn’t get s~~~ done and it sure as s~~~ don’t get it done properly.

If the CEO were a man, I could have gone into his office and been able to justify a 100% immediate raise to fire 7 women and be able to give a list of reasons why they would be more profitable. But she is not a man, she is a woman who thinks women should have a job JUST because they are women. She pays at least 7 salaries for no reason, when she could hire 1 or 2 men to do the work. I will therefore enjoy watching their business fail over and over again.

A penny saved is a woman fired.

Men actually RUN the race.
Women just draw the finish line wherever God dropped them.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 0]

Hi KeyMaster,
Klasse Statement.
A penny saved is a woman fired. (LOL)

Danke für das Video von bar bar
schönen Sonntag
Gruß Hollowmile

[Total LeeParticipant 1573]

That’s a good one!

[McQueenParticipant 77]

It’s not a bonus. It only looks like a bonus because we have to work and earn what we want. Giving a woman a job she can’t do is not an advantage of any kind. It does society no good. It does her no good. It does the company no good. It’s a failure waiting to happen on all counts. EVERYTHING is temporary. Unearned advantages are not advantages. It’s legal lying on a resume. It’s just a matter of time before someone realizes she has to go and all she did was f~~~ s~~~ up more while she was there. You spoil a child and give it a chocolate bar when it wasn’t good or didn’t do any chores, and you’re not being kind to it. You’re training it to expect something for free.  Why should it work when it didn’t need to earn it?

Just observe how women are in their personal lives. They want everything for nothing. A woman once told me “you need to respect women”. All I could do was laugh. I told her if you want anything including respect you will make an effort to earn it of you will shut the f~~~ up. She couldn’t even get her head around what I just said. She is doomed for life. I would rather have self respect than respect of any woman. It’s as worthless as her disrespect. That would go right over her head. too.

[Anonymous 0]

Hi McQueen,
pleased to meet you.
You brought it to the point. It is not a Bonus, never. It is a god damned bane. But it is not men’s fault. Unfortunately it is not good for men, for children, for  the Society you already mentioned it,  and hence, not good for women too, . But who is up to change it or to work against it ?
Men ?
No way !!!
Why ?
If men stand up these things to change, immediately they will called selfish, bossy, jealous and whatever, you got the idea. Men can only analyze the Situation and indicate to it, that’s it.
If someone can change it, then only women. But, unfortunately women are always runinng in the waiting- and taking mode, never or very seldom in the action mode. Do you think they will act ? I guess it will never happen. They opened the Pandora’s box and I am sure they will never tame the ghosts they rouse.

Last but not least the laws of economy will change it respectively  navigate it in a logical and most effective way , if women want it or not. Until then, the Things to come, maybe not so nice.
Anyway, I like to observe the goings-on.

Have fun…CHEERS !!!

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

I’m a medical doctor in Texas, and I went to medical school here.  Texas has about a half dozen medical schools and produces about 1000 doctors a year.  To get in, you must take the admissions test.  To qualify to even sit for that test, you have to have taken a year of physics, a year of biology and a year each of both basic chemistry and organic chemistry.  Although Texas has a reputation for being a redneck state full of backwards, sexist attitudes, I found that when I showed up in class on my first day of medical school that half the class were women.  52% to be exact.  I was impressed that there were that many women who had done that well on those science courses and on that test because they are not easy, and women have a reputation for being better at language skills than at math and science.

About a year later, I found out that each applicant is assessed individually for admission, and the minimum score required for women to get into medical school is lower than for male applicants.  How much lower it is varies from year to year.  They just lower it enough for women of each application class to make sure that half the class is women when medical school starts the first day.

They don’t publicize this.  They just do it.  They don’t openly admit they do it, but they do.  I only found out because after I got into medical school, I dated a secretary in the admissions office who slipped and told me they did it.  Long after graduation and long after I was no longer dating the admissions secretary.  I met a nurse who had taken the test and wanted to go to medical school,  but had only an average score.  She wanted to know if her score was good enough to get her in and I told her I’d check with my old girlfriend and find out.  The girlfriend’s answer: That score is too low…even for a female…

I realized immediately what she had just said.  WTF do you mean ‘even for a female?’  I got a little irritated and pressed her and she admitted that the state government who determines the medical school’s budget each year requires them to have 50% women.  The school doesn’t have a choice.  I asked her about all the tuition money each student was being charged and she said that each student’s tuition in this state covers only about 20% of the cost of the education that the medical school provides.  The other 80% is provided by the state, so the school has to do what the state government demands.

About halfway through the first year, I had 2 female medical students tell me right to my face that the only reason they had enrolled in medical school was to marry a doctor.  They had no intention of actually practicing medicine after graduation.  I thought these were just 2 very screwed up individual women and didn’t think much further of it.  But a few years later in my residency, I mentioned that to one of my male mentors.  He told me that there was a study done about the gender differences in medicine in the United States that showed that 5 years after graduation from medical school, the number of female medical graduates still practicing medicine full time was only about 35%.  You won’t see the results of this study showing up on the main stream media.

So in order to meet the projected demands for doctors of the patient population 5 years from now, using classes of medical students that are 50% women, the schools have to produce 150% of the number of doctors that will actually be needed…because they know that 2/3 of the female medical school graduates they produce will not be full time doctors 5 years out.  It would be ok with me if these women wanted to pay for (and then waste) their educations out of their own pockets.  The problem I have, is that 80% of their educations were paid for by public tax dollars.

The moral of the story is that even if you don’t marry them and let them rob you of your money through the courts, they can still take it from you in taxes by mechanisms like this…

PS  I kept up with those 2 female medical students who said they only went to medical school so they could marry a doctor.  Both of them slept with and later married male doctors from the medical school’s clinical instructor staff.  Neither works full time anymore.  The first had 3 kids with the doctor from the instructor staff, filed for divorce, married another doctor (her boss at her part time job) bankrupting the first guy and has been collecting child support from him ever since.  He’s a basket case now.  His life is wrecked.  She works one day a week, but is planning to retire completely soon…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[ThoughtPoliceParticipant 3]

I work in aerospace and the insistence on having women in engineering is going to cause the end of America’s technological dominance. They can’t think for ship and all they want to do is talk about “process”. Which means they like to make flowcharts about how people should do things, and they do nothing. Somehow, anything they do is given an award when it usually just involves rearranging papers on a desk. Or working in a “team”.  How I f~~~ing hate that word that allows them to take credit for male work because they were in the same room. Somehow miraculously they become managers way before they’ve actually done anything. I wonder how that happens. I pray for America, but I don’t have much hope.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

This paragraph (^^^ above from ThoughtPolice) is so filled with truth, my cup runneth over.

The way women go on about the f~~~ing “process”…..

I have actually seen it written out in a Facebook status(es) more than 100 times. “It’s not the destination, it’s the journey” and s~~~ like that. As if NASA launches a f~~~ing billion-dollar rocket to never touch down anywhere, take no pictures, and perform no data collection. This is no different than women calling 3-hour meeting to “talk about the process”, “discussing the minutes” , talking about “best practices” while accomplishing jack s~~~.

I was contracted to work for a female-run business founded 1986. I met with them and interview about a big upcoming project, and the woman in charge says “we’re a start-up”. I ask: “Oh really? I thought you were established in 1986”.

“yes, we were.”

ME: “Well 1986 was 26 years ago. So why are you still referring to yourselves as a start up?”.

She laughed uncomfortably. I laughed harder. But only with my teeth. Not with my eyes. Worked for them for 2 years while the women proved themselves to be as useless as t~~~ on a bull. When I was over-achieving , I over-invoiced that t~~~. Charged them to just open and read an email. Because it’s not about the work that I DID….. it was about the process. So I invoiced them accordingly – for “the process”.

This t~~~ actually had the nerve to call a meeting a 5PM knowing I was 1 hour away with traffic. Rush-hour traffic. Certainly! I will be happy to come in. See you at 5. When I showed up personally, the t~~~ had the nerve to phone it in and didn’t even show up personally herself – for a meeting about her own business. ( Remind me again why I was asked to come in personally? ). She bought me and the other guys coffee, though. Wasn’t that so nice of her?

A $2 coffee and stale cheese danishes. Thanks.

I invoiced her for 4 hours (I way in both directions and 2 hours of wasted time) and itemized it as “called in for personal meeting + travel time + gas and parking”. The f~~~ing bitch was livid. But she paid it. You know…. because she’s all about the process.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 0]

Talking about the process and doing nothing.

You are absolutely right. I observed meanwhile that a lot of manginas are doing it in the same way. It seems to be that they are in a competiton with the bitches who can talk the most bulls~~~ about the process for the longest time.

If someone is not in the mood to work, okay, go ahead an leave me alone, or stay here dandle your b~~~~ or whatever but let me go on with my work.

But what are those braggarts doing ? Not enough that they don’t work, they are standing in the way of those men who wants to work.

Jesus Christ, those braggarts babble all days, get the promotion and the real workers getting fired, and then everyone is surprised if the company gets bankrupt. GREAT!!!

A few years ago I did read a joke. How to crash a company ?

Use computers, that is the safest way.

Play Poker, that is the fastest way.

Employ women, that is the most beautiful way.

Let me correct the last option:

Employ women, that is safest and fastest way.

CHEERS!!!

 

[Anonymous 1]

I remember a company that my brother was working for went bankrupt when a women committed fraud and stole a lot of money and manipulated people’s wage so that she would get more. She was in charge for a few weeks when the boss was on holiday. This was the downfall of this company and went bust within a few weeks. It was a call centre I think and it is commission based so it can easily be manipulated.

You never hear this stuff from an all man job like warehouse work (Them jobs are usually the best for wages but the work is hard since its mainly lifting) To be honest most of the women in the warehouse I worked in were in administration but women are s~~~ with money so it doesn’t make sense.

[…Spectator 1165]

“I work in aerospace and the insistence on having women in engineering is going to cause the end of America’s technological dominance.”-Thought Police figured this out.

[– Deleted on Request –Spectator 936]

Here in Canada, political correctness is the second state religion, the first being hockey.

A foreign grad student I once courted while I was finishing my Ph. D. got herself a tenure-track faculty position at a university elsewhere in the country. I contacted her to bring greetings to her and she mentioned she got her position and the funding for it because of a requirement to hire more “women and visible minorities”. Being both female and Asian, getting the job was a cinch for her.

What irritated me wasn’t that she got the job but those specific conditions. I remember when, during the 1960s, people fought for the right to be treated equally and, like Martin Luther King said, being judged not by the colour of one’s skin but on the content of one’s character. I believed that the best person should be hired, regardless of their sex or ethnic background. She was definitely smart enough for the job and would have been in the running on that alone.

Evidently, I was mistaken all these years. Oh, by the way, it looks like she got tenure last year.

[Anonymous 5]

The quota Canada has to meet for more female police officers is pretty funny. They are too far behind because women aren’t applying for those jobs.

[Author]

Posts