The state exists only to transfer your money to women

Topic by Hammerdown

Hammerdown

Home Forums MGTOW Central The state exists only to transfer your money to women

This topic contains 12 replies, has 12 voices, and was last updated by Samsquanch  Samsquanch 3 years, 4 months ago.

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #312958
    +8
    Hammerdown
    Hammerdown
    Participant
    528

    A study was done in New Zealand that shows there’s a MASSIVE disparity in how much men pay in taxes vs. women and how much men get back from tax funded services vs women. I’m using a New Zealand study on this because studies of this type tend to be rare because they’re “politically incorrect” and don’t fit the narrative. I’m sure if you do some digging you can find data for your own countries: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2375926

    So what we learned:

    1. For all age groups, men pay far more tax per capita than women.

    Men in the prime earning age group of 24-65 pay more than women of ANY age group.

    2. For nearly all age groups, men pay far more than they receive while the opposite is true for women.

    Men will only wind up taking out more than they pay in once they hit retirement age. With the exception of 45-65, where they have given up having or raising children and headed back to work but before retirement, women take out more than they put in for their entire lives. On average, a male 30 year old will give an annual net contribution higher than women from any age group.

    Now for the last part, which I find the most damning:

    3. Women will never repay what the state spends on them. The only time men also don’t is if they live past 85.

    Basically there’s no point in a woman’s life where she breaks even and pays her way. Men on the other hand have paid themselves off so to speak by age 40 and stay that way unless they live longer than 85 years. Even then they will cost about $10 000 while women will cost 15 times that much.

    So what did we learn?

    A) The state and welfare state transfer large sums of male earned wealth to women
    B) The disproportion is so severe that even if the “muh 77 cents” gap existed, it would be dwarfed by how massive the tax gap is
    C) Hate the patriarchy all you want, ladies. It’s the only thing keeping the trains running and the power on. Countries depend on taxing male income and only through male labor do they have any hope of working. But I’m sure all of you could have told me that.

    So next time a woman accuses you of working too much or claiming how she’s strong and independent and doesn’t need a man, you can laugh and laugh and laugh…

    #312977
    +11
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35837

    It is a moral obligation for all men to avoid or ignore every tax possible. Tax evasion isn’t so much a crime as a duty.

    #313016
    +6

    Anonymous
    42

    Tax evasion isn’t so much a crime as a duty.

    It’s not EVASION when you tell those motherf~~~ers to get bent straight to their faces!

    Hey THIEF, GET BENT!

    NWO: God is peanutbutter, the state is GOD, women are it’s agents of inequity, children are the tool to utterly demote man and they’re working on moving the family pets to a new position over the man so the pet can be made to p~~~ down his neck when all is said and done by THEIR new deity! F~~~ THEIR GOD, I have a hotline strung through their battlefield reconnecting with the lords thy god and his natural order!

    Hello, MGTOW! The new law&order! Closer to gods will than any MANGINA ALIVE!

    The c~~~s have no idea what suffering is all about,,, UNTIL NOW!

    #313032
    +4
    Rhino
    Rhino
    Participant
    3477

    Let it all burn the sooner the better we can just watch from a distance as they run around like chickens trying to put out the fire that will to big to contain. Once it dies down and the smoke clears it will be us standing looking at the smoldering heap that used to be government and society.

    #313039
    +3
    RoyDal
    RoyDal
    Participant

    The bulk of your tax money goes to paying the salaries bureaucrats (more than 70%). The little bit intended for welfare that dribbles out indeed is disproportionately allocated to women, here in the USA.

    Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

    #313083
    +4
    Boar
    Boar
    Participant

    It makes me wonder what the State will do as tax revenues from men continue to decline? Once whimyn start paying more taxes, I bet the laws will change to favor them further and screw men over more.

    Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

    #313153
    +3
    Awakened
    Awakened
    Participant
    35203

    “The state exists only to transfer your money to women”

    My loving wife only exists to transfer my money to herself.

    In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

    #313192
    +2
    Atton
    Atton
    Participant

    This kind of supports the idea that women are an artificial fusion reaction. You never get out more than you put in, at some point this system is going to run into trouble. This belongs on top gun this kind of information is what really throws an wrench into the cultural narrative. I’d love to see the numbers in Australia and the US.

    A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

    #313199
    +2
    Faust For Science
    Faust For Science
    Participant
    22557

    This is why minimalism exists. Cannot squeeze water from a rock.

    #313238
    +2
    Beer
    Beer
    Participant
    11832

    This is why minimalism exists. Cannot squeeze water from a rock.

    Exactly…I have friends that are going out and buying houses and big trucks now and I just cringe thinking at all the extra taxes they’ll be paying just to have stuff. I’d much rather do with a little less…I’ll work less years of my life and pay less income tax because I won’t need as much money to buy stuff, I’ll pay less sales tax because I’ll be buying less stuff, and I’ll pay less property tax because I’ll own less stuff.

    #313266
    +2
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35837

    It makes me wonder what the State will do as tax revenues from men continue to decline?

    The state will borrow money until lenders finally see they won’t be repaid and it can’t borrow any more. Then it will steal the wealth from everyone’s savings and labor. It won’t do this overtly with draconian taxes or asset seizures. It will do it by printing money until it’s worthless, thereby inflating away the value of savings and wages in the form of dollars.

    The government is already doing all this. You can see it happening. And if you look at history you’ll see that the inevitable final step is total economic collapse.

    There are things that could be done to prevent all this, but that would lose politicians votes from the parasitic classes.

    Once whimyn start paying more taxes, I bet the laws will change to favor them further and screw men over more.

    Women will never pay taxes. Ever. Or at least never enough to compensate for the huge amount of taxes they consume. Because women are one of the parasitic classes whose votes are most easily bought with men’s tax money.

    I have friends that are going out and buying houses and big trucks now and I just cringe thinking at all the extra taxes they’ll be paying just to have stuff.

    It depends on whether or not those houses and trucks etc. are toys, or earners. A rental property may cost in property taxes, but that should be more than compensated by the rent received. Because landlords don’t pay property taxes. Renters do. And in most places renters pay a lot more in property taxes than homeowners. This is why renters who vote for property tax increases thinking they won’t have to pay because they are only renting are idiots.

    And rentals and other real assets are a relatively safe investment because the government can’t inflate them away from you. As the value of the dollar plummets, rents will simply rise to match it. Or switch to other exchange mediums than the dollar.

    #313271
    +2

    Anonymous
    3

    Everyone needs housing. And it’s an actual asset that will always have value.

    You get a house to live in, and either rent out a part of it or buy other houses and rent those out. If you have it setup right, you don’t have to worry about money and everything is covered.

    To the topic at hand, the sole purpose of the State was always to re-allocate resources from the masses to the unproductive that refused to “work”. It’s not just women, but the rich, elite families that have all the wealth, guarantee themselves continuing wealth, and prevent competition.

    There have been other forms of this in the past. Slave owners, Feudal lords, nobility, maybe now we call it capitalism but it’s not really. It’s really always the same thing with a different name when you get down to it.

    So don’t worry about society collapsing. I guarantee you the oligarchs have much more to lose, so they’ll figure out how to keep things going, until it inevitably all fails, because all human things fail eventually.

    MGTOW shouldn’t worry about any of this stuff. Yes it sucks paying those taxes, but that’s why once you have things setup right you stop working or work a heck of a lot less, and minimize your tax exposure. I used to do 80 hour weeks and clear a nice six figure income. Most of it went to taxes. Now? I have no debt and own everything outright, I shoot to work maybe 2-4 months at most out of the year, and even then I don’t like going over 40 hours a week. And even those 2-4 months get harder and harder to work as the years go by and my investments pay more.

    #313288
    +1
    Samsquanch
    Samsquanch
    Participant
    4226

    Men provide
    Women consume

Viewing 13 posts - 1 through 13 (of 13 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.