The so-called ex-feminist…beware of her trick.

[dobsin593Participant 239]

When you see the latest wave of feminism recently; the bitchy, nasty, psycho, vile, feminists and then see some of them saying they aren’t feminists anymore, beware of a deception…
A lot of these so called ex-feminists are still feminists and if you have discernment, you can see whats happening.
I brought up the latest wave of feminism. Do you guys remember the first wave of feminism and what women were like? It was back in the days of ladies and gentleman, women held to being ladylike(now a sexist term in feminism), and gentlemen were groomed to show women entering the workplace and all walks of society, common courtesy, good manners, respect, chivalry, partiality, etc.
Many ‘ex-feminists’ are simply reverting back to the beginnings of different aspects of the first wave of feminism. They are simply starting all over and will still acquire men showing them courtesy’s coupled with benefits they have already acquired from feminism of today. I’ve seen it in some ex-feminists and know they are pretenders. Not paranoia but an observation.

[Anonymous 6]

Honestly, this “New Wave” that you’re talking about isn’t quite how you’ve described it, but it does include what you’ve described.

The “New Wave” of feminism is to redefine what it is, to equivocate the original and dictionary meaning of the word. Here is an article to read:

http://msmagazine.com/blog/2010/09/07/10-years-of-feminism-is-for-everybody/

In the above mentioned article the author defines feminism as:

It’s that simple: Feminism stands opposed to oppression. If you’re not down with that, you’re against it, no matter how many times you try to rebrand the word by taking it out of context.

So the Author is the one who is rebranding the word and taking it out of context. The Oxford Dictionary defines feminism as, “The advocacy of women’s rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes.”

This is ultimately what any feminist or ever ex feminist is all about. Redefining words to fit whatever agenda that they now have. Women are chameleons without any scruples what-so-ever.

By the way if you’re still not convinced of what I’m saying read that article a bit. It actually says there are as many “versions” of feminism as there are women. That means feminism means whatever the bitch using the term want’s for to mean. It also means that ex-feminists are actually feminists themselves. They just have the wrong idea about what feminism means.

[AttonParticipant]

Feminism is a gun and the women folk are the users.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[UntamedParticipant]

Now, all of a sudden they’re not feminists? so f~~~ing what? Who f~~~ing cares knowing that every single word that escapes their mouth is a lie, knowing that a word doesn’t describe a person, knowing that they’re All Like That?
Weemins think of feminism as some abstract sets of semantic they may or may not agree with, Men see feminism as the embodiment of a weemin’s character.
Feminism didn’t create weemins, weemins created feminism out of they own warped view of the world and the Men who conquered it. Feminism becomes them.
I’ve talked to so-called ex-feminists and make no mistake about it, they retain the view that weemins are somehow oppressed and that the advances feminism has brought us aren’t enough, they still view this world as if it was under a Patriarchy, they simply don’t use the word and bring it all down to their personal lives.
Go ahead and trash feminism in all its ugly forms in front of a so-called ex-feminist, you’ll see how she STILL defends it as some “progress that did help weemins at one time” while nothing could be further from the truth.

Weemins who say they used to be feminists but not anymore have simply woken up to the fact that guys usually stay away from a woman who calls herself a feminist, even if she has no clue what it really means. She’ll be the FIRST one to defend another bitch even knowing that bitch is in the wrong.
Don’t get fooled by their words, watch their actions.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[mgtowcuriousSpectator 91]

I just posted a vid thread on this..wow…I was not wrong..thank you god

[joetechParticipant]

Any woman who says they’re not a feminist is a liar. Of course, we all know that women lie like they breathe. They hate truth, objectivity, and anything that doesn’t benefit them directly. A woman is always right no matter what (just ask one) and the minute she’s proven wrong she’ll change her opinion like a dirty tampon and claim she never held an opposing view. In their minds responsibility is something only men have. What do women have? They have the delusion that no matter how good they have it, it should always be better, and it’s always a man’s fault that it isn’t.

"Don't follow in my footsteps...I stepped in something."

[CataphractParticipant 2656]

They are rejecting only the “label” of feminism not its core beliefs because they are coming to understand that identifying as a feminist is husband-repellent and the prospect of ending up as a lonely old spinster horrifies most women.

Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

dobsin593 wrote:

When you see the latest wave of feminism recently; the bitchy, nasty, psycho, vile, feminists and then see some of them saying they aren’t feminists anymore, beware of a deception…
A lot of these so called ex-feminists are still feminists and if you have discernment, you can see whats happening.
I brought up the latest wave of feminism. Do you guys remember the first wave of feminism and what women were like? It was back in the days of ladies and gentleman, women held to being ladylike(now a sexist term in feminism), and gentlemen were groomed to show women entering the workplace and all walks of society, common courtesy, good manners, respect, chivalry, partiality, etc.
Many ‘ex-feminists’ are simply reverting back to the beginnings of different aspects of the first wave of feminism. They are simply starting all over and will still acquire men showing them courtesy’s coupled with benefits they have already acquired from feminism of today. I’ve seen it in some ex-feminists and know they are pretenders. Not paranoia but an observation.

Modern day feminism finds courtesy, manners, respect, and chivalry from men to be abhorrent. Because they find men to be abhorrent. Unless those men fit into their agenda. Then they merely tolerate them.

[sidecarParticipant 35864]

Deeds not words, laydeez.

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then might I give a f~~~ what so-called “anti-feminist” women have to say.

[OgreParticipant 5863]

As a man let me just say.

1. I was never a rapist actual or potential.

2. I was the father of female children who I loved, protected, and provided for.

3. You’ll never find me unless you’re looking, so who is the aggressor.

4. I took care of my ability to impregnate years ago. Take your pregnancy claims to whoever made that happen.

5. Last but not least, my mirrors are for seeing what’s trying to get me not to see what I chose to leave behind.

I failed to realize in my youth that I was the prize. I was going to work. I was going to earn. Little did I realize that due to feminism, that no longer meant I had to share. Road soon, Desert after.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12053]

Anonymous wrote:

This is ultimately what any feminist or ever ex feminist is all about. Redefining words to fit whatever agenda that they now have. Women are chameleons without any scruples what-so-ever.

This is the best definition I have read so far for feminism, and that’s exactly what is about.
It’s women nature brough into politics, feminism is like the wife manipulating the husband (the husband being the government).
That’s why I tirelessly repeat to not confuse feminism with marxism: you KNOW what marxists could do.
In example marxists do NOT support capitalism. NEVER.
Feminists ask (and get) incentives for private businesses owned by females, and quotas for women in the corporate boards.
Marxists do NOT support treating men and women in a different way: in example under every marxist government prostitution was forbidden and both the prostitute and the customer were arrested.
Feminists ask (and get) women being free to sell sexual services and men buying sexual services being criminalized.

You can expect a lot, really a lot, of s~~~ under a marxist government, but never the feminist things I just cited.
The only thing you know about an hypothetical fully feminist government is that it would be fully detrimental to men and fully benefitting women, but you can NOT have idea of its policies, because their “ideology” isn’t really an ideology, every step is calculated to give to women an advantage, and steps change according how situation change.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts