The SJW and the rise of the Nanny State

[Anonymous 1]

I was thinking today about the history of the SJW in the United States. The temperance moment came to mind. Back in the 1800’s the Pub was the man-o-sphere. Women didn’t like that so they wanted to invade that space. Ever hear of Carrie Nation?

Carrie Nation

She was one of the big SJW of her time. She would throw stones at bar goers smash up your bar with a hatchet. No one dared touch her because she was a little ole’ lady. She claimed she was doing it to “save men’s souls” (using violence of course). Fast forward a couple of years, women finally got the right to vote with the 19th amendment. The first thing they did was ban alcohol to destroy the “Man Space” of that time. Keep in mind this is the same era that saw WWI. Men who didn’t want to go and fight were shamed by the women of the time. These SJW women would stuff a white feather in your shirt if you didn’t go to WWI and get killed for them. Of course the women wanted “equality” but they did not go and fight in WWI.

White Feather Movement

This whole attack on masculinity coincides perfectly with the women’s suffrage movement. In reality women’s suffrage and the Social Justice War is a full spectrum attack on all things masculine. They even went so far as to poison the alcohol during the prohibition era. That was fine because as Carrie Nation says death is what drunks deserve.

Chemists Poison Liquor to Kill Drinkers

Well thats my little trip down memory lane for the day. What are your thoughts on the precursor to the modern SJW? Isn’t it interesting how this coincides with the rise of Socialism in the western world?

[Anonymous 25]

Well Trump is kicking that to the kerb.

He is demolishing the administrative (nanny) state. UK went Brexit too and both seek to re-establish the special relationship.

The cycle repeats and we’ve now entered to era of reaganism and thatcherism. The difference this time round is that men went awol (herbivore in Japan) and (mgtow in West)

I’m really interested to see how this plays out. But I’m fairly certain it’s not in communist sjw and feminist’s favour

[Anonymous 3]

As much as I say AWALT, I must confess at times I have wondered if white women are just the absolute worst women on the planet. White birthrates have always been lower than other races, all through history from what records we have.

Feminism is white women just forcing their s~~~ on everyone else. The minority women probably were never that great, but they get infected by white women, but even then they have a resistance to going full into feminism the way your average white woman is so giddy to join into it. I’ve actually seen minority women fight with white women on this stuff.

And white women seem keen on betraying white men, whereas women of other races do seem to want to stand by their men more.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

I’m really interested to see how this plays out.

We already know how it’s going to play out. They’re all going to emigrate to Canada on my beaver nickel… 🙁

[Anonymous 5]

Prohibition was the love child of the SJW hamsters known as Women’s Christian Temperance Union
They were the equivalent of the self righteous, pontificating feminist SJW’s of today but they used alcohol to as a weapon to shame men. Look at the horror Prohibition caused.
The hamster road to hell is paved with SJW good intentions.

It’s all rather ironic considering the wine cask sucking single women of today.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Anonymous wrote:

She was one of the big SJW of her time. She would throw stones at bar goers smash up your bar with a hatchet. No one dared touch her because she was a little ole’ lady. She claimed she was doing it to “save men’s souls” (using violence of course).

Somehow I can imagine this women being condemned to hell for her pride, with her punishment being to drown in a lake of liquor.

Anonymous wrote:

Fast forward a couple of years, women finally got the right to vote with the 19th amendment. The first thing they did was ban alcohol to destroy the “Man Space” of that time.

And now the largest percentage of drunks in the nation are women.

Anonymous wrote:

Keep in mind this is the same era that saw WWI. Men who didn’t want to go and fight were shamed by the women of the time. These SJW women would stuff a white feather in your shirt if you didn’t go to WWI and get killed for them. Of course the women wanted “equality” but they did not go and fight in WWI.

Now the progressive hawks are so bloodthirsty they openly support drafting both men and women.

My how things have changed.

Things are finally starting to go wrong for the SJW feminists. The results of the November election broke what few strands of sanity they had left. SJWs are becoming more and more disruptive and violent.

Many women are starting to reject feminism because they realize they have a good thing and if the SJWs continue women in general will find themselves sent back to the kitchen with no rights. Either by collapse or gunpoint. I am not sure which. Because men have a limit until they decide to force change, at which point governments collapse and society is changed by force.

[Anonymous 1]

Faust For Science wrote:

SJWs are becoming more and more disruptive and violent.

Yes, thats what they do. Even 100 years ago Carrie Nation was using violence to go into a pub and disrupt the man’s world. Pubs were places were men used to go an have a few drinks, unwind, talk about life and important things that affected their communities. Then the WCTU came in and disrupted it, shutting down real community from happening. Now with all the rules about drinking its killed the whole pub atmosphere. Thats why men need their own space, MGTOW is taking it back.

[Anonymous 3]

Faust For Science wrote:

Many women are starting to reject feminism because they realize they have a good thing and if the SJWs continue women in general will find themselves sent back to the kitchen with no rights. Either by collapse or gunpoint. I am not sure which. Because men have a limit until they decide to force change, at which point governments collapse and society is changed by force.

They wish they could go back to the kitchen. Pretty much all women go through this schedule if they can: full time work—>s~~~ out baby—>part time work—>another baby—>never work again

A lot of times they even try to skip the baby part of the simp pack mule will let her get away with it. And then often at home she’s busy f~~~ing other men while he works.

But there has never been a time in world history where women were “forced into the kitchen with no rights” and certainly not at gunpoint.

Women intentionally choose the home, because it’s easy. And they can get away with it. If men had the power, men would force women to work, while men would sit at home. We have some threads on here showing experiments where they tried equal work, and the women would always run off to home the first chance they’d get. And that’s also happening in the West. Every woman that can does it. The women that can’t, because they flooded the workplace and also aren’t nearly attractive enough to land a high class man that can support a household with one income, work only because they have to. Most jobs suck. Whining about that won’t change that. Even if all the non-elite men were kicked out of the workforce, there still wouldn’t be enough “good” jobs for women to lord it over in.

But the danger women find themselves in today is that men won’t marry them and won’t let them be in kitchen. LOL@ this idea that we’re going to marry women and force them into the kitchen at gunpoint. Why would we do that. We get to go our own way, they get to work and have cats, while we get freedom.

Women were always a burden. They used to marry young, and a father would have to pay a dowry to a man to take his daughter of his hands. And she had to be a virgin, and she couldn’t be fat, and she couldn’t be a bitch. None of this was coerced, they could be all those things and then be unmarried, a burden on her parents because no man would take her. Hence why fathers made sure their daughters were marriageable and then married at a young age, because if that didn’t happen he was stuck with her.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Anonymous wrote:

But there has never been a time in world history where women were “forced into the kitchen with no rights” and certainly not at gunpoint.

Never in history has there been a MGTOW movement such as this. The issue is that if women keep pushing men then women are going to lose everything they have one way or another.

Anonymous wrote:

Women were always a burden. They used to marry young, and a father would have to pay a dowry to a man to take his daughter of his hands. And she had to be a virgin, and she couldn’t be fat, and she couldn’t be a bitch. None of this was coerced, they could be all those things and then be unmarried, a burden on her parents because no man would take her.

I do not believe you understand the full concepts of “arranged marriage” and “dowry”. There is “coercion” going on the part of the would-be bride.

[Anonymous 3]

Faust For Science wrote:

phoenix wrote:

But there has never been a time in world history where women were “forced into the kitchen with no rights” and certainly not at gunpoint.

Never in history has there been a MGTOW movement such as this. The issue is that if women keep pushing men then women are going to lose everything they have one way or another.

phoenix wrote:

Women were always a burden. They used to marry young, and a father would have to pay a dowry to a man to take his daughter of his hands. And she had to be a virgin, and she couldn’t be fat, and she couldn’t be a bitch. None of this was coerced, they could be all those things and then be unmarried, a burden on her parents because no man would take her.

I do not believe you understand the full concepts of “arranged marriage” and “dowry”. There is “coercion” going on the part of the would-be bride.

Then please explain, brother Faust.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22558]

Anonymous wrote:

Then please explain, brother Faust.

In some cases an arranged marriage in some parts were by the family to marry off the daughter to anyone they could find to take her off their hands. The dowry was the bribe. And the daughter has no say as to whom she would be marrying.

[CataphractParticipant 2656]

I get the distinct impression that what women hate most of all is men-only spaces, it doesn’t matter if there were a million co-ed or women-only spaces nearby, if there is even just one man-only space, they seem to lose their minds over its existence.

Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

[Anonymous 3]

Cataphract wrote:

I get the distinct impression that what women hate most of all is men-only spaces, it doesn’t matter if there were a million co-ed or women-only spaces nearby, if there is even just one man-only space, they seem to lose their minds over its existence.

Yes, and we have evidence that has been going on for thousands of years.

That is really how to balance the sexes, more than anything else. Men need our spaces.

Women are inferior physically and intellectually, but are superior emotionally. Partly because they don’t have emotions. But they can easily manipulate men, and it’s really quite brilliant. That’s how the genders are equal.

Now when you empower women even more on that, and balance out with force everything else, men are going to just get completely destroyed. Natural already created equality as each gender has its roles and specialties, creating man made equally on its face ignores those natural equities and only enslaves men. I believe in Rome it was Cicero or Augustus that understood this, but it was too late by then. And it’s been mentioned since by great male minds.

[sidecarParticipant 35838]

Anonymous wrote:

Fast forward a couple of years, women finally got the right to vote with the 19th amendment. The first thing they did was ban alcohol to destroy the “Man Space” of that time.

Actually the 18th Amendment banned alcohol. That came before the 19th Amendment gave women the privilege of voting without the responsibility of being drafted.

However it was definitely women pushing for the 18th Amendment even without the vote. It should have been a grim warning of the idiocy those bitches would accomplish if ever they got the franchise. But it wasn’t.

And you can thank those c~~~s for income tax, too. They had no chance at ramming through prohibition while the government was dependent on tariffs on alcohol sales. Prohibit the manufacture and sale of alcohol and the government would lose most of its income. So they “liberated” the government from that restriction in the 16th Amendment, effectively destroying the constitutional prohibition against confiscatory taxes and giving congress the power to use the tax code to bypass all other limitations on federal power. And just look at the s~~~ that has gotten us into. A massive, bloated federal budget, unwarranted burdens on the productive, and $20,000,000,000,000.00 in debt. Thanks laydeez.

[Anonymous 1]

sidecar wrote:

However it was definitely women pushing for the 18th Amendment even without the vote. It should have been a grim warning of the idiocy those bitches would accomplish if ever they got the franchise. But it wasn’t.

Yes, my mistake. The point of my argument is that the temperance movement and women’s suffrage movement went hand in hand to destroy the “man-o-sphere” of that era. Your point about the income tax is great! That never could have existed without prohibition. I think when it started it was a couple of percent. Now its like 30%. It was incrementally increased over time so that people wouldn’t riot.

[Author]

Posts