The Nawalt Irrelevance

[Darth SinParticipant 576]

Greetings fine gentlemen.

When we ourselves talk or hear other men talk about women, especially a collective of women, in a critical and unapologetic way, one of the many supposed rebuttals that we hear, apart from shaming tactics, is NAWALT and its variations.

For those who do not know, NAWALT is the acronym for Not All Women Are Like That. Other variations of NAWALT include NAFALT where F is for feminists.

As such,I would like to talk today about the NAWALT argument. Specifically, why the NAWALT argument is pointless and irrelevant when we speak of the human female collective..

The reasons for the NAWALT irrelevance boils down to two things :- Systems and Incentives.

The reality is that the systems and incentives that are currently in existence in many parts of the world allow women to do whatever they want and whenever they want with little to no consequences whatsoever. Consequently, there is no reason for women to hold back or think through their actions. Why bother doing such petty actions when you have a myriad of safety nets covering your arse should you go full retard ?

If women falsely accuses men of rape or violent assault and they are discovered doing that, they get next to nothing. At worst, they get a slap on the wrist. If their false accusations were not discovered, their word are almost always believed as true.

If women assault men or rape them, either nothing happens to the women or once again, thanks to pussy pass, they, at most, get a slap on the wrist combined with society making up excuses for them. For instance, observe the rising reports of female teachers raping young boys in north American schools and see what happens to these women. Next to nothing.

If women divorce men on a whim or because of feels, nothing happens either. They get half the man’s stuff, his car, his house and custody of his kids most of the time.

If women choose to enter a particular profession, they have tons of affirmative action, diversity policies and “equality” laws at their side. Oh, and they have white knighting men and corporations who will bend over backwards to accomodate for them or let them in.

If women cheat or commit adultery, there is almost no consequence for it either. In fact, this is seen as a form of female empowermen. It is usually the man’s fault. Par for the course really.

If women are broke or homeless or decided to do stupid things like get pregnant while in their teens, they have a welfare system that full supports their life choices with checks every month. What’s worse is that welfare checks in USA will make you get more money than a postgraduate student.

If women commit crimes, they are guaranteed to get lesser sentencing or no sentencing depending on how much of a feminist or white knighting fools the judges and the juries are.

In addition to all this, there are legions of moronic Sir White Knightingtons who are willing to play Captain Save-A-Hoe for women instead of letting women fend for themselves. Titanic anyone ?

I can keep going on and on and on but the essence of it is this :- When you have a system that allows a group of people to get away with whatever they do and want, they will act on their self interest and focus on seeking their own gratification with little regard to anything else. Why should they give a damn about anything else ? They are getting to have their cake and eat it too.

This is why, no matter how nice a woman might be, no matter if she is a NAWALT or not, no matter if NAWALTs exist or not, men still face a big risk when they interact with women. Because the systems and incentives in place allow any and all women, no matter if they are NAWALT or not, to go full retard and f~~~ you up with little to no consequences for doing so. NAWALTs are irrelevant because the exist in a system which allows them to go full blown AWALTs with no problems.

As such, will you, as a man, rely on the fragile and whimsical notion that women might be good ? That she might not make uses of the systems to cash in on its rewards ? That she might remain good for long periods of time ? That you might have to beg with her or parlay with her endlessly to ensures she remains good and not use the systems in place ? I say that only a man who is desperately addicted to women, white knights and manginas of the worst degree, will do such things.

A thinking man, a rational man, a sensible man, a practical will not rely on slim chances. They will not rely on irrelevant deflections. A thinking man will look at all that is going on and be cautious when he is dealing with women, out of a sense of self-preservation. A thinking man will use his rational mind, not his dickhead and not his emotions when interacting with women. Most importantly, a thinking man will not rely on theoreticals like NAWALT.

Cheers.

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

Yep. It doesn’t matter if you find a NAWALT, you are in a system engineered to profit off of your mistakes, a system designed for you to fail, in which women are weaponized to aid in that process. At any moment, a woman can ruin you or attempt to ruin you with hardly any consequences for her.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

Yes indeed. It seems like a lot of hard work but you only have to absorb it once. Then auto instinct kicks in.

I don’t even think that way anymore ….. it’s as simple as breathing.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Snake wrote:

Yep. It doesn’t matter if you find a NAWALT, you are in a system engineered to profit off of your mistakes, a system designed for you to fail, in which women are weaponized to aid in that process. At any moment, a woman can ruin you or attempt to ruin you with hardly any consequences for her.

I would add profit from your success if not your very existence.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[BONEParticipant 448]

as far as I’m concerned…EWALT (enough women are like that) I’ll have a better chance at beating “battle toads” than finding a NAWALT.

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

Any Woman Can Choose To Be Like That With No Accountability

[BurgundyParticipant 1525]

Yop, As long the game is rigged, don’t play the game. For men the game is on hardcore mode, death is punishment, for women, there is no punishment, it’s all about how much you can win through a raffle system with some titty input.

 

I sometimes really want to believe in the NAWALT, but a woman can do an 180 at any time, the second she does, she has all your extra lives, and spawn point in her claws, lol.

 

Even if the playing field should finally get even again, I only see it as a timesink, better spent on furthering your own dreams, than chasing some tail.

[BDParticipant 1146]

BONE wrote:

EWALT (enough women are like that) I’ll have a better chance at beating “battle toads” than finding a NAWALT.

Battletoads was freaking hard! Would a game genie help?

Ewalt, newalt, whatever walt are all irrelevant.

Because in order to be able to think, you have to risk being offensive.

[kizellParticipant 368]

There is no such things as nawalt.   Every western woman will always find some way that she has been “wronged” as justification for her decisions.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

kizell wrote:

There is no such things as nawalt. Every western woman will always find some way that she has been “wronged” as justification for her decisions.

Now ain’t that just the absolute truth. After a while, you just gotta get tired of the fukery, and be done with it. Period.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[Great-OzParticipant 226]

Back in my youth and blue-pill/White-Knight days I totally believed in the NAWART. I would allow women whom I felt an emotional connection to walk all over me and get away with everything. I placed myself in risky situation after risky situation. The end result was that I ended up being caught in the legal spider web. Now, as I continue from the purple-pill and into the full red-pill stage I find that I no longer believe in any woman doing anything for me without some benefit to her from that action. Looking back throughout my history I can see where each time a women helped me, whether it be stranger or family member, there was always an agenda lurking to be sprung with the timing fit their needs. I strongly caution anyone male that believes his unicorn exists or is even possible in the current world climate.

"Life is the future, not the past." Wizard's 7th rule, Terry Goodkind

[treelville..miamiParticipant 893]

I feel ya bro!

Women are sole property of the state, which is loaded with white knight scumbags.
As for NAWALT and what not they’re all the goddamn same every last one of em.

"The wounds of honor are self inflicted"

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Society wants to sell you lottery tickets, very low odds things of happen, to have you generate loyalty to their patterns, and operate under the delusion that it can be different, all you need to is just get lucky, and keep trying.

My view is that I don’t care if not all women are like that.  What I can about is NO women I deal with, on a personal level are like that.  And if none exist, well I don’t have any then.  Tough.  It is my job to make sure that I don’t have any who are, and if I do, it is my fault.   I say this as an empower view of things, and do know I, and other men can slip up.  But, that doesn’t mean I have to.

 

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[FreeGhostSpectator 318]

It’s difficult to tell if you have one or if she’s trying to set you up down the road. Almost always, she is trying to use you.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

BD wrote:

Revolutionbegins wrote:

EWALT (enough women are like that) I’ll have a better chance at beating “battle toads” than finding a NAWALT.

Battletoads was freaking hard! Would a game genie help? Ewalt, newalt, whatever walt are all irrelevant.

I am sure guys can be able to see a metaphor in the jet bike level of that game.  Go through hoops, jumping from platform to platform, and avoid getting clobbered.  Someone going along with you there doesn’t help.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[FitzBonesParticipant 304]

Sure, maybe there are NAWALTs around. Rare but possible. My point though? They dont stay that way. As the adage goes, men go into a relationship expecting a woman to stay the same..

"If you can fill the unforgiving minute with sixty seconds' worth of distance run,"

[Anonymous 11]

The very term NAWALT itself implies that most women are like that. Women are fickle by nature, and they consider it their prerogative to change their minds at will. Today’s NAWALT could very well be tomorrow’s cheating cougar out f~~~ing every teenage boy in a 10 block radius while you’re out working.

Woman in general are so selfish and corroded that to place your fate in one’s hands is extremely risky.

[Anonymous 25]

Darth Sin wrote:

This is why, no matter how nice a woman might be, no matter if she is a NAWALT or not, no matter if NAWALTs exist or not, men still face a big risk when they interact with women.

I agree. As far as I’m concerned I want danger money for having to be around any woman. I’m not talking marriage here. If I go to the shops or walk past them in the street or be around them at work I am at risk of some of their stupid nonsense allegations.

I don’t work for free and I don’t take on risks for free, they owe me danger money. I can’t wait until the litigation starts on this point. It’s going to be hilarious.

[Ned TrentParticipant 4894]

BD wrote:

Ewalt, newalt, whatever walt are all irrelevant.

Which actually happens to bring us back to Women are like that Disney …

I'd rather die a natual death with a clear MGTOW conscience somewhere off the grid than one within "modern" civilisation with a big stress mark on my forehead and a couple of dozen tubes plugged into my body. Back to the plantation..? Me..? Hey, literally: I won't ever fucking kid myself...YZERLMNTSIC

[DybbukParticipant 182]

Echoing some of the other opinions above…there are NAWALTs out there, but people change when their environment changes. Specifically, if you get married to a NAWALT, there is a massive power shift from you to her, and as the old saying goes, powers corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Even if the woman still intends to treat you fairly (unlikely), the dynamic has changed, and she’s probably doing it out of pity, like you were a pet.

And marriage also changes the man in a way that damages the relationship. A big part of what it means to be a man is to be able to choose your own destiny and put in the effort to strive toward that destiny. By getting married you forfeit that possibility by surrendering all your (legal and cultural) power to your wife. Such an emasculated, helpless man will be less attractive to his wife. The modern institution of marriage is thus autodestructive.

[Author]

Posts