Home › Forums › Blue Pill Hell › The Jungle Book (2016)
This topic contains 6 replies, has 5 voices, and was last updated by
Max 4 years, 4 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
There’s a live action movie on The Jungle Book coming out next year, and I’ve been honestly looking forward to it. I love the original cartoon, and thought the trailer looked pretty awesome…there’s one slight problem, though.
You hear a woman talking throughout the trailer, and I thought it was just some voiceover or something. Turns out, it’s Kaa! Apparently, they gender-swapped one of my favorite characters in the film to a female!! WHY WAS THAT NECESSARY? I don’t give a frag that it’s Scarlett Johansson voicing “her.” Do we REALLY need to gender-swap for the sake of inclusion?? I don’t recall anyone EVER complaining about there being “too many males” in the original cartoon.
Still looking forward to Keymast–I mean Bill Murray voicing Baloo, though.
Actually, Kaa is the only role that I think would be PERFECT for a woman.
I mean, Kaa is THE role model of a “modern woman”, don’t you think?
A snake, a betrayer, an evil, yet cunning person, who only “fights” with “venom” (call that “venom” ‘shaming and nagging’ and we have a real woman), who does nothing than to try to f~~~ with the man’s life…
Yep, if that is not the perfect depict of a “modern independent & strong woman”, then I don’t know what else would be…
"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.
Or, since she’s playing a (non-venomous) boa constrictor, we could say she’s like a woman…because they SQUEEZE THE LIFE RIGHT OUT OF YA.
(Still loving your venomous snake analogy regardless!!!)How many f~~~ing remakes of classic animated films are we going to have just to get that extra cash? Originality is just so lost…
my issue with this is that it strays too far from the original authors vision. authors don’t take lightly the decision to make a character male or female. many and sometimes all of the characters have bits and pieces of the author in them or pieces of characters the author knows personally. making changes to characters like this is like adding brush strokes to the Mona Lisa. There’s nothing wrong with female based stories or female main characters, obviously, but writers need to write some rather than just steal them. Ironically, female authors aren’t writing many stories with female main characters and the ones that are being written are heavily romantic in nature with love triangles (2 men fighting for her).
I bathe in the tears of single moms.
my issue with this is that it strays too far from the original authors vision. authors don’t take lightly the decision to make a character male or female. many and sometimes all of the characters have bits and pieces of the author in them or pieces of characters the author knows personally. making changes to characters like this is like adding brush strokes to the Mona Lisa. There’s nothing wrong with female based stories or female main characters, obviously, but writers need to write some rather than just steal them. Ironically, female authors aren’t writing many stories with female main characters and the ones that are being written are heavily romantic in nature with love triangles (2 men fighting for her).
You are right, brother. But I thought about one thing:
Probably, yes, Rudyard Kipling inspired himself in someone to write Kaa, no doubt about it. But think on the character only, here.
Kaa as Megachris said, is a boa constrictor, a serpent that the only one wish is to “squeeze the life out” and eat Mowgli. Now, if you take an example, from today’s life, who in your eyes would fit this character’s as a glove? Who has a behavior that is really like this character’s behaviour?
Women, right? Think of this as a small, a really small dose of a massive red pill, who will be given to anyone who watch this movie…
Sure, a lot of people will ignore it, they will just laugh, they will get “the joke”, but will not agree. And yet, there will be a few souls out there who WILL take the joke seriously, who will look at his side and see the world (and women , of course) for what it really is…
This movie will be like all Chuck Palahniuk movies… It will be like a giant Morpheus showing you both hands with the blue and red pills. And like in The Matrix movies, many will still take the blue one, but a few souls will take the red one. And that, my friend, is how MGTOW will be (massively) spread…
That is the same way that feminism was spreaded in the last fifty years… Sub-consciously, stealthily.
A small dose, here and then, and many more men out there will wake up…
"Young was I once, I walked alone, and bewildered seemed in the way; then I found me another and rich I thought me, for man is the joy of man." Odin, Hàvamàl, stanza 47.
Actually, Kaa is the only role that I think would be PERFECT for a woman.
I mean, Kaa is THE role model of a “modern woman”, don’t you think?
A snake, a betrayer, an evil, yet cunning person, who only “fights” with “venom” (call that “venom” ‘shaming and nagging’ and we have a real woman), who does nothing than to try to f~~~ with the man’s life…
Yep, if that is not the perfect depict of a “modern independent & strong woman”, then I don’t know what else would be…Actually in the original story, Kaa was Mowgli mentor and friend, just like Baloo and Bagheera.
I became a MGTOW because this was the only logical solution for a man survive in a world replete of gynocentrism and biased against men!
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
