The Intolerance of the "Tolerant woman"

[IggyThundersParticipant 246]

Okay. Full disclosure. Politically I am a right wing Conservative with some Libertarian leanings. Almost all of the women I come across online however are Liberal/ Left Wing. This is hardly surprising to me as liberalism at its core is very much a mommy party based on emotion and eschewing empirical evidence or your own lying eyes. I dont want to get into a whole political thing here, but this is just how I see it. One of the hallmarks of todays Liberalism is “Tolerance” and non-discrimination to almost suicidal ends. Tolerance and acceptance of other people’s choices, cultures, lifestyles, morality you name it. Yet for liberal women, this so called tolerant facade comes crumbling down when it enters the realm of men whom the liberal female will bless with her company. This can often be witnessed on dating sites. One in particular is OK Cupid. Those familiar with this site know that there is a whole host of questions that both men and women are asked to answer and are used as a barometer of sorts as to their mutual compatibility. Right off the bat you can tell that most of the questions were written by a liberal just from the biased way the questions are framed. But I digress.

I dont know about most other guys, but when I see some girl online that I might be interested in dating there are only a few things I want to know?

1. Am I physically attracted to her.
2. Is she nuts or does she have the high potential of being a ball breaker?
3. Does she seem like she is sweet, caring, nurturing and feminine.
4. Is she a slut with a bunch of kids from three different men.

Thats it! Thats all I want to know or care about at first blush. The rest I will determine from when we go out on our first date or talk to each other. Other than that, I can think of nothing else that would be an initial deal breaker for me, or would prevent me from even talking, texting her. Are their certain things she might list that would have me rolling my eyes and put my radar antenna up? Absolutely. But these things would in no way keep me from meeting someone. So could someone please show me where all this free-flowing tolerance is? The problem with many of these women is that as tolerant and spontaneous as they claim to be, they are the complete opposite. By looking at a mans bio and the way he’s answered some stupid questions they have already gone through a 5 year relationship with you in their head! In two seconds they have created a bunch of different scenarios of your lives together, thought of what their friends would think of you, had your first anniversary together,gone through an unplanned pregnancy and finally divorced!

Here are just a few samples of OK Stupid questions that are immediate “Dont email me” if you dont answer correctly:

1. Your significant other is perfectly content with their minimum wage job and has no plans to look for more challenging/batter paying work. Is this a problem?

Almost all women answer “Yes. I wouldnt be able to tolerate that”. So I guess it matters not if he is the nicest and most decent guy in the world or if he is simply an intellectual who lives in the world of books and ideas and could give a s~~~ about keeping up with the Joneses. My answer? No. I dont give a s~~~.

This next one if very telling of todays American woman. It may not be a “Deal breaker” question but is very revealing.

2. Rate your self confidence. Below average,average, higher than average, Very, very high.

Take a guess what the majority answer? Yup. Higher than average and very, very high. Welcome to the fallout of years of pumped up false and toxic self esteem with nothing to back it up.

3. Could you ever date someone who has strong political feelings that are opposite of your own?

Take a guess. NO.

4. Would you date a smoker?

No. I think its disgusting.

I dont know how most of the older broads made it throgh the 80s and 90s. Granted, this attitude is just for American males. I guarantee you if some devilishly handsome Frenchmen with a Guilloise hanging from his lips sniffed in her direction she would be buying him his ashtrays.

5. Would you date someone who has negative feelings towards another race?

No.

Of course it doesnt occur to these knee jerk’s that there are things known as gradations. They just see a guy with a white hood giving a “Sieg Heil”. Just because someone has a problem with other races, there could be a rational reason. It doesnt immediately mean they are ready to comit genocide. Once again. Non-Discrimination as todays highest moral value rears its head.

6. Would you date someone who tells racist jokes.

NO.

Of course a few Polish, Irish or Italian jokes would be okay though. Because hey, they are just dumb white European oppressors anyway.

7. Would you date someone who kept a gun in the house?
NO.

Of course that attitude would dramatically change if rapist and murderer entered her house and her boyfriend who was staiyng over just happened to pull out a Glock. But hey, no critical thought neede here. After all, if he owns a gun he is just one step away from being a mass murderer and right wing nut job right?

The list just goes on and on.

[braininavatParticipant 95]

It is one of the ironies of the contemporary idea of tolerance that it has become a highly intolerant ideology. We’ve all seen the videos of women protesting speaking engagements of Warren Farrell. And have you ever listened to Dr. Farrell? He comes off as a real Caspar Milquetoast. By that I mean he is soft-spoken, reasonable, careful with his statistics, never over-the-top in his critique. But even this is too much for the ideologically-motivated gender feminists. I like to imagine what might happen if Barbarossa or Stardusk gave a public lecture on a college campus. It might trigger the decline and fall of civilization. Even the smallest deviation from the party line of the superficially tolerant is enough to get you frozen out. For ordinary folks this doesn’t have to be catastrophic, but for academics it would mean the end of their career, and so we can understand how the intolerance of “tolerance” has blossomed on university campuses. Nothing is acceptable other that rigid indoctrination and complete self-abasement before the party line.

You’re certainly right that the vast majority of women identify as left/liberal, and I see this as a completely straight-forward translation of political interests. Many MGTOW sources have analyzed in some detail how the income-redistributing nanny state is essentially a feminist creation that takes men’s productivity and re-distributes it to women. (There is a WIC program, but there is no MIC program; there are quotas for women, but none for men, etc.) There are subtle and politically sophisticated ways of doing this without ever explicitly acknowledging that this is what is being done. The PPACA is only the only the most recent, obvious, and potentially expensive examples of this. Politicians pander to the female vote, because women are the majority of voters and regularly turn out to vote in their interest. Again, Barbarossa and Stardusk have both developed the idea that feminism is “weaponized female nature” and “non-stop female advocacy” and that women will continue to vote in subsidies for women even when it harms them. I think it was Barbarossa who noted that in the university context this means that female subsidies and preferences have resulted in a male-hostile environment that means that husband-hunting women actually disadvantage themselves by reducing the number of men on campus. Why are more women than men today getting degrees? What is the source of this social crisis? Maybe it has something to do with colleges systematically marginalizing men and male interests.

In short, women’s “tolerance” means “tolerance for men doing what women say that men should do and be.” That’s it. And even then it’s not enough. We all know that women are contemptuous of the white knights and pathetic male feminists who advocate for women’s interests, and it is the alpha thugs that they want to f~~~, as long as they can find a “dad” to pay the bills for their offspring. The more men who refuse to be chump, the more this female strategy will be self-defeating. Until then, we are stuck with “tolerance.” Fortunately we all get to enjoy the warm fuzzies for living in such a tolerant society.

[Total LeeParticipant 1573]

By looking at a mans bio and the way he’s answered some stupid questions they have already gone through a 5 year relationship with you in their head! In two seconds they have created a bunch of different scenarios of your lives together, thought of what their friends would think of you, had your first anniversary together,gone through an unplanned pregnancy and finally divorced!

Jesus Christ that is the truth.

Would you date a smoker?

This is a real gem. I like to have a smoke when Im drinking and so does every chick who says she doesn’t smoke and thinks it’s disgusting. I will call them out on it and ask her why she misrepresents herself like that. If it’s disgusting, then it’s disgusting, but they are all “ok just one” and then she’s chain smoking all night long. If smoking is so disgusting why can’t I tell her fat is disgusting?

ON TOLERANCE – CANADA STYLE
(this directly from that vaginized website Yahoo)

Jiggs McDonald, NHL Hall of Fame broadcaster speaking in Orillia, Ontario, says: “I am truly perplexed that so many of my friends are against another mosque being built in Toronto. I think it should be the goal of every Canadian to be tolerant regardless of their religious beliefs. Thus the mosque should be allowed, in an effort to promote tolerance.

That is why I also propose that two nightclubs be opened next door to the mosque thereby promoting tolerance from within the mosque. We could call one of the clubs, which would be gay, “The Turban Cowboy,” and the other a topless bar called “You Mecca Me Hot.”

Next door should be a butcher shop that specializes in pork, and adjacent to that an open-pit barbecue pork restaurant, called “Iraq of Ribs.”

Across the street there could be a lingerie store called “Victoria Keeps Nothing Secret,” with sexy mannequins in the window modelling the goods.

Next door to the lingerie shop there would be room for an adult sex toy shop, “Koranal Knowledge,” its name in flashing neon lights, and on the other side a liquor store called “Morehammered.”

All of this would encourage Muslims to demonstrate the tolerance they demand of us, so their mosque issue would not be a problem for others.”

Yes we should promote tolerance, and you can do your part by passing this on.
And if you are not laughing or smiling at this point… It is either past your bedtime,
or it’s midnight at the oasis and time to put your camel to bed!!!!

[TheBardParticipant 974]

Those who preach tolerance are often the most intolerant.

To me there is no such thing as a fully tolerant person because it is impossible. If a guy is a rapist, murder, and child molester no one is going to be tolerant of that. Our whole political system is based on intolerance. Every election is about attacking the other party and each political aligned news network telling its viewers why they are right and the other side is wrong. In college I used to laugh while in polysci classes and all the women thought they were so smart for choosing to vote Democrat and actually believing the politicians cared about them. I used to be a huge Republican a long time ago, but then I saw that they were no different from the Democrats and grew to hate politics. Nothing more funny than a women going on about how men have oppressed women and don’t treat them equal, but than demands women get special treatment over men.

Of course that attitude would dramatically change if rapist and murderer entered her house and her boyfriend who was staiyng over just happened to pull out a Glock. But hey, no critical thought neede here. After all, if he owns a gun he is just one step away from being a mass murderer and right wing nut job right?

Last year there was this article about how some liberal group in New York published the names and address’s of every gun owner in the city without asking them or telling them. It was obvious they did that so people go go harass them, but when I brought that was ironic because women say no one should be able to know if they had an abortion because of right to privacy why can;t gun owners have privacy to not let people know about their guns. The women’s response was “if you have a gun what do you have to hide?” My response “If you got an abortion what do you have to hide? Both are legal so why not have everybody share their personal business with the world?” Her response to that was “Well 1 in every 3 women has had an abortion so you better get used to it” I didn’t say anything else because she obviously had no logical things to say. Leave it to a woman to say no man should control her body, but it is ok to control our weapons and give out our names and address just because you disagree with gun ownership.

[VileNordParticipant 766]

Those who preach tolerance are often the most intolerant.

This is actually known in philosophy as the “Paradox of tolerance”. The paradox lies within the fact that a person preaching tolerance cannot do so without expressing his/her intolerance of………intolerance.

Lust for comfort suffocates the soul

[TheBardParticipant 974]

<cite>@vilenord said:</cite>
This is actually known in philosophy as the “Paradox of tolerance”. The paradox lies within the fact that a person preaching tolerance cannot do so without expressing his/her intolerance of………intolerance.

That is exactly what it is. Watch any type of tolerance talk and they are always hating one someone. Some of my favorites are “Legalize drugs, people should be able to put what they want in their bodies. Ban fast food it is bad for your body” or “Those people are so intolerant for not wanting a Muslim temple built there. Christianity is an evil religion that should be banned because it is evil.”

[MurveParticipant 21]

<cite>@gonesolo said:</cite>

When women answer those question, they are so dishonest it’s unbelievable! Each and every “no i wouldn’t” is a lie. They say whatever they think other women want to hear.

So many women care so much what others think about them that they will spout any old drivel that they think sounds the best at the expense of looking like a complete hypocrite to anyone intelligent or enlightened to see between the lines. I really like people that don’t give a rat’s arse what others think about them and I think that’s the case with most men, even women. You can’t have everyone like you as a person and to accept that feels liberating.

[Author]

Posts