The Hens are calling for Traditionalism

[AsceticmonkParticipant 846]

Anonymous wrote:

They won’t obey their husband, they won’t marry as chaste 16 year old virgins, they want to be able to leave with divorce rape and openly commit adultery whenever without consequence.

REKT

[narwhalParticipant]

That’s about a reasonable as calling for a return of the typewriter. Seriously, I think traditionalism would have died out regardless of feminism, simply because the value of a stay at home wife has fallen off tremendously, replaced with modern tech and services.

It could possibly make some sense for a man who makes money fairly easily and has a desire to homeschool his children. Otherwise it does not, as a woman who stays home cannot possible be productive since there just isn’t enough to fill her time. Even if she develops some hobby that brings in some income, it will likely be more of a drain then actual income.

For those who have no kids, it’s just nuts. It’s no difference then letting your adult jobless child live with you rent free. There is no way that child can earn his/her keep and show any real love or respect for you.

Ok. Then do it.

[FreedomParticipant 295]

These traditional housewives can still divorce their husbands and walk off with most of the money, forcing their ex-husbands out of retirement to pay their ex-wives a salary in return for nothing.

Until that is fixed, count me out.

It is wise to fear dangerous commitments.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

trader1913 wrote:

the american dream of a white picket fence house with a wife and 2 kids never existed.

That’s not The American Dream. That’s just the dream of lazy, entitled women. Why should their lazy entitled desires be elevated to the title of The American Dream?

[OldBillParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

that’s about a reasonable as calling for a return of the typewriter.

Very well put.

Sadly, while we repeatedly tell tradcons and similar simpletons that the clock can not be turned back, they continue to ignore the facts. It isn’t that they can’t understand. It’s that they choose not to understand.

Seriously, I think traditionalism would have died out regardless of feminism, simply because the value of a stay at home wife has fallen off tremendously, replaced with modern tech and services.

Again, that’s a fact which tradcons choose not to acknowledge or understand.

I grew up in the 60s and 70s. Leave it to Beaver seems as normal to me as it seems like science-fiction to younger men. Even then, even without the labor saving devices we have now, housewives had very little to do. Many never got dressed beyond slipping into a housecoat for the day. They dressed up with hats and gloves just to go shopping because it helped fill all the empty time they had.

They’d pour a bowl of flakes or scramble some eggs for the family’s breakfast, shoo the kids off to school or outside to play, and then do f~~~ all for hours. They could follow 2, 3 , or 4 soaps every day because they had 2, 3, or 4 hours free every day. Lunch would be sandwiches made a quickly as shuffling a deck of cards and in the late afternoon they’d start preparing for supper.

We kids called one of our neighbors “Mrs. Robot” because she did the same chores at the same time on the same day every f~~~ing week. Monday was laundry day, Tuesday she ironed, Wednesday she baked for the week, Friday she shopped after the morning newspaper circulars came out. She even fed her family the same meals on the same days. She had next to nothing to do every day.

Even if she develops some hobby that brings in some income, it will likely be more of a drain then actual income.

Even their jobs rarely provide the income necessary to support their working. I had a colleague in the early 90s whose wife returned to work after their daughter started kindergarten. She was a legal secretary, not some minimum wage slave, and yet she still didn’t bring home enough to offset the cost of her working. My co-worker ran the numbers and boiled down to his wife’s “career” being dependent on him funding it to the tune of a couple hundred a month. She was hurting rather than helping the family budget and he was essentially paying her to pretend her work meant something.

Of course, feminists and the allies will now squeal that day care and all the rest should be government subsidized completely ignoring the fact that any subsidy is still a subsidy. If what you earn by working doesn’t cover the costs of you doing that job, you’re play acting. You’re pretending your labor matters and ignoring the fact that someone else has to earn the money to make up the shortfall.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[MGTOW KnightParticipant 7477]

sidecar wrote:

That’s not The American Dream. That’s just the dream of lazy, entitled women. Why should their lazy entitled desires be elevated to the title of The American Dream?

George Carlin already solved this very question. There isn’t an American Dream. It is the biggest shame ever concocted to deceive the masses in the U.S.A.

Fuck bitches... literally and metaphorically

[trader1913Participant 1577]

sidecar wrote:

That’s not The American Dream. That’s just the dream of lazy, entitled women. Why should their lazy entitled desires be elevated to the title of The American Dream?

I think it was clear that i was talking about that specific american dream; which in the past represented women and blue pill men which make up 95% of people. If you’re american dream is different then im not talking about that.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

MGTOW Knight wrote:

There isn’t an American Dream.

Oh but there is. And I’m f~~~ing living it.

trader1913 wrote:

I think it was clear that i was talking about that specific american dream;

And I think I was clear that that’s not an American Dream at all, specific or not.

It’s just clever marketing to women by the picket fence industry etc.

[MGTOW KnightParticipant 7477]

sidecar wrote:

Oh but there is. And I’m f~~~ing living it.

You live in a matrix just like all of us. If there was an American Dream, the globalist have destroyed it.

Fuck bitches... literally and metaphorically

[trader1913Participant 1577]

sidecar wrote:

And I think I was clear that that’s not an American Dream at all, specific or not.

It’s just clever marketing to women by the picket fence industry etc.

So a dream held by most women and blue pill men is not an american dream but your definition is…not to mention the religious history of the US lends itself to that american dream.

This dream is apparently a marketing ploy and not something deeply rooted in human biological predispositions. Most people want to have children (including most men) and most people want a long term partner to have children with (including most men).

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

MGTOW Knight wrote:

You live in a matrix just like all of us.

What is the matrix if not a dream?

trader1913 wrote:

So a dream held by most women and blue pill men is not an american dream

Of course not. Because there’s nothing specifically American about it. Because, by your own admission, most women and blue pill men want it (though I have my doubts about the blue pill men – they’re just pretending for her sake). But most women are not American, and women everywhere still want that s~~~, or at least the local cultural equivalent.

Spoiler: British women, German women, Chinese women, Tongan women, Kenyan women, and so on ALL want that “white picket fence”. And they all expect men to provide it to them.

AWALT.

[TicParticipant 4329]

is it not a dream to live without the nagging of a ungrateful c~~~? And I get to do it in America, hence my American dream LOL

God bless peace and freedom.

[TicParticipant 4329]

sidecar wrote:

What is the matrix if not a dream?

and the steak tastes so good

God bless peace and freedom.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Tic wrote:

and the steak tastes so good

Especially when you’ve hacked the matrix.

Going Your Own Way is the rootkit.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

Germaine Greer stirred up all the s~~~, and wants none of the blame for the role she played. Did you listen to her part in the video? Zero accountability. She filled these women’s head with nonsense and now women who followed her nonsense have reached the realization that she was full of s~~~. And they’re p~~~ed.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

IRuleMe wrote:

And they’re p~~~ed.

And that is not our problem.

But it is funny as f~~~.

[NotaFoolParticipant 134]

sidecar wrote:

IRuleMe wrote:

And they’re p~~~ed.

And that is not our problem.

But it is funny as f~~~.

Sidecar, you slay me. You took the words right from my brain before they even got to my mouth.
F~~~ those dumb bitches. They follow the flock over the cliff and the one’s who didn’t take the swan dive into their own demise are looking at the false prophet Shepherdesses and looking for a sacrificial lamb to blame there stupidity on.
Why should we give a f~~~ about her or the sheeple that she led astray. They grow wool let them shave it and lay in the bed they made out of that wool.

" if women didn't exist , all the money in the world would have no meaning" Aristotle Onassis "Women are like Elephants, everyone wants to look at them but, nobody wants to have one" W.C. Fields

[narwhalParticipant]

OldBill wrote:

Even their jobs rarely provide the income necessary to support their working. I had a colleague in the early 90s whose wife returned to work after their daughter started kindergarten. She was a legal secretary, not some minimum wage slave, and yet she still didn’t bring home enough to offset the cost of her working. My co-worker ran the numbers and boiled down to his wife’s “career” being dependent on him funding it to the tune of a couple hundred a month. She was hurting rather than helping the family budget and he was essentially paying her to pretend her work meant something.

I ran into this when I was married. She was a Spanish teacher that decided to stay at home. Then when we losing money badly, she said she was going to help out by working part time as an interpreter. I didn’t even have to run the numbers to know that was a bad idea, and I told her so. It would have only drained use further.

I was told that I wasn’t supportive of her. Funny, I thought her goal was to actually help out. And trust me, if she could have managed to stay on budget for once, I would have supported the hell out of her.

Ok. Then do it.

[johny45674Participant 231]

Old Bill as ever has hit the nail on the proverbial head, there is no going back. Time and entropy only allow us to forward, what is done cannot be undone.
Ladies you made your bed beds, now you lie on them (and if men are smart) with only your cats for company.

I'm a one man guy in the morning, the same in the after noon. A one man guy when the sun goes down, I whistle me a one man tune. I'm a one man guy, one man guy, and the one man is me. 👍🏼Thanks Loudon Wainwright for the wise words

[Anonymous 3]

IRuleMe wrote:

Germaine Greer stirred up all the s~~~, and wants none of the blame for the role she played. Did you listen to her part in the video? Zero accountability. She filled these women’s head with nonsense and now women who followed her nonsense have reached the realization that she was full of s~~~. And they’re p~~~ed.

These women chose for themselves to be misandric, to attack men and boys at every opportunity and to proudly play the bitch. As dumb as women are, which is pretty dumb, even they know right from wrong, and they know the things they were doing is blatantly wrong. They laughed as they did all of it after all.

Greer is no more at fault than every other woman. She just spoke out what they were all thinking and feeling.

The fact that women make NAWALT arguments means they know how bad their behavior is, but just want to dodge accountability afterwards. Otherwise they would insist there is nothing wrong with their AWALT behavior.

[Author]

Posts