The "Happy" Couple

[AwakenedParticipant 35206]

My friend’s daughter just got engaged.

She’s a good looking Woman pushing 30, and I know that she has been sleepin around for many YEARS. She lived with at least one of em and sucked/f~~~ed who knows how many. Of course none of this will keep her from having a “White” Wedding. In other words, your typical western woman.

Anyways, I recently saw “engagement” pictures of the happy couple, and all I could focus on was the “dumb” look on HIS face. He really has NO CLUE what the hell he is doing. He’s “LIVIN the DREAM”, and someday he’ll be
“Livin the Nightmare”.

He’s like the sheep that’s being led off to slaughter.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[jimbob15217Participant 491]

Awakened–

Woman=singular
Women=plural

Just like man is singular and men is plural.

No disrespect bro. Just makes writing clearer.

[ghostParticipant]

Survival of the fittest.

[narwhalParticipant]

Awakened, your post seems to imply that the fact/believe that she’s had numerous sexual partners means she is even less likely to be a good wife. I don’t get the correlation.

I would agree that it is rather disingenuous for a woman who has clearly been around the block to wear white at her wedding. I just don’t think a virgin wife would make a better wife in any way. It’s not like the fact that she’s never had sex with a man before somehow makes her less likely to file for divorce.

Ok. Then do it.

[AwakenedParticipant 35206]

jimbob15217 wrote:

Awakened–

Woman=singular
Women=plural

Just like man is singular and men is plural.

No disrespect bro. Just makes writing clearer.

It escaped me this morning. Thanks

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[AwakenedParticipant 35206]

narwhal wrote:

Awakened, your post seems to imply that the fact/believe that she’s had numerous sexual partners means she is even less likely to be a good wife. I don’t get the correlation.

I’m merely stating that like most western women, she has had numerous c~~~s in her past, and I’m assuming that her marriage will be a train wreck.

The tradition of white meaning purity is a complete Joke.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[TrailbossParticipant 1844]

I think your assumption is spot on! I give this “Happy Couple” 2 years before they implode. Got I hope he doesn’t have a kid with this chick! Not much you can do though…some guys just have to learn the hard way. I know I did. But…I DID learn! #MANOUT!

An educated, armed populace cannot be enslaved.

[Big Viking Chef BVCParticipant 1286]

Young men should talk to a family law lawyer BEFORE they get married to find out exactly what they are getting into. If they still want to get married after they are informed, then go for it. I am all about choices and freedom, but that means informed choices, not blindfolds.

Swallow this RED PILL ===> Men will lay down their lives for their brothers, their women and their children. This makes Men useful as slaves. Women will lay down their lives for ONLY their children. To expect more from women is just a FANTASY created by society and reinforced by the unconditional love that we experienced from our Mothers. The key to freedom is the understanding that the woman you meet is not going to fantastically love you like your Mother did. If you buy into the fantasy, then she is your new master. If you do not buy into the fantasy, then she is nothing, and you retain your freedom.

[AwakenedParticipant 35206]

Big Viking Chef BVC wrote:

I am all about choices and freedom, but that means informed choices, not blindfolds.

Most men are Blinded by the Lies of the Blue Pill, but they will be exposed to the TRUTH of Female Nature during marriage, and that will awaken some to the TRUTH.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Anonymous 42]

Awakened wrote:

He’s like the sheep that’s being led off to slaughter.

A moment of silence for a man that believes marriage is purity and for keeps.

I may have f~~~ed his bride, sorry Charley, you were late to the party!

[finallyfreeParticipant 341]

Sorry but Awakened did use the CORRECT form of the word in his first post??? Woman. Why would he write : “she is a good looking women” ? As 1 woman she is singular not plural. She is not multiple women ? she is 1 woman.

Of course none of this will keep her from having a “White” Wedding. In other words, your typical western woman. – Correct

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

ghost wrote:

Survival of the fittest.

Darwin was wrong. Strong organism do not adapt, they don’t need to, like crocs those f~~~ers are dinosaurs and they still here, or c~~~roaches, week life form need to adapt to survive, strong ones don’t give a f~~~.

If they don’t survive NO ONE CAN.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

Carnage you are correct about adaptation being the device of the weak with one exception.

Intellect rules ignorance forever.

I am one man up against all civil
authority.
I am the weaker and
they are the stronger.
I should have to adapt
and change.
I am on the side
of the truth and they are
running a post truth
system in an environment
of modern tech.
where the truth
is more and more
becoming self evident
and obvious.
They can continue
their attempts
to bully me into
changing but cannot
continue claiming the high
ground morally.
If I refuse to adapt
eventually the stronger
is forced to adapt
by tolerating the truth
that I exist as is
and will not budge
off my morality.
No one likes a bully.
The stronger can only
kill the weaker who are
stubborn as me.
they cannot force
my adaptation to an immoral
system.

Key is to be willing
to die protecting
your position.

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

STATS: Add 10% divorce chance for each premarital sex partner she had. 5 partners? 50% chance divorce. 9 partners? 90%. 0? 0%

[Maraudrz1Participant 2250]

Sad about your friend’s son. He will be living the nightmare in a few years.

Women's brains and vagina have one thing in common. There is nothing in there until a man puts something in there.

[OldBillParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

your post seems to imply that the fact/believe that she’s had numerous sexual partners means she is even less likely to be a good wife. I don’t get the correlation.

There is a direct correlation between the number of sexual partners a woman has had before marriage and the chance the marriage will end in divorce.

Quite frankly and considering how long you’ve been here, I’m surprised you’ve never seen the statistics on the issue. They’re posted rather often.

Edit – Surfdude12 provided a good link on the topic. Watch it, pay attention to it, and remember it.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[SandalsParticipant 4254]

Big Viking Chef BVC wrote:

Young men should talk to a family law lawyer BEFORE they get married to find out exactly what they are getting into. If they still want to get married after they are informed, then go for it. I am all about choices and freedom, but that means informed choices, not blindfolds.

Yeah, but who should he talk to about lawyers before talking to the family lawyer?

[Author]

Posts