The Great Birth Control Hoax

[WhackerGuy2030Participant 999]

And it’s still working.

I find it funny I run into chicks that tell me they’re on the pill, so “everything is good.” To which I promptly reply, “The public schools are filled with the children of women who were on-the-pill.”

One of two things are going on. Either women are the dumbest species on the planet that they keep getting knocked up on the pill, or it is an invisible rug to be yanked at the time of cashing in.

With the nearly fail safe alternatives like the shot or the ring, the fact that oops still happen is boggling to me. Seems like a paternity fraud ring that should be prosecuted under the RICO statutes.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Whenever any man about is about to be intimate with any woman who says she’s “on the pill so everything is good”….. he should whip out a condom anyway, and watch how offended she gets. Now you know why.

Lying to get pregnant is not exactly “paternity fraud”. That’s when she tells the OTHER guy she’s f~~~ing that she’s “on the pill so everything is good”…. and then 4 months later she tells her boyfriend (or husband) “it’s your baby”.

Even though that’s the worst possible non-violent thing a woman can do to man, it’s still “legal” in all 50 states and Canadian Provinces. And women wouldn’t have it any other way. They think this is their “right”.

Every time it’s uncovered on Maury Povich show (who made an entire career out of this daily f~~~ing occurrence) that the man is “NOT THE FATHER!!”, she should be escorted off stage in handcuffs and sentenced to 18 years of monthly payments.

Instead, he coddles her as she faceplates herself to the ground and CRIES like some “victim” of being Jabba the Slutt.

••••••

“BBBBUHH TOOTA TOOTA SOLO. KONG WUNG-JI KOCH-BA.”

That’s Jabba-nese for “every time Maury says “you are not the father”, no woman ever turns to him and says “sorry”.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[AttonParticipant]

The likely hood of birth control that is correctly implemented and tailored to the woman in question failing is pathetically low. Using say a condom and an implant would make the likelihood of a pregnancy lower than 0.001%. A woman would have a much great chance of being hit by a meteorite and killed.
I am going to go with this since it seems more likely.

or it is an invisible rug to be yanked at the time of cashing in.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[economistParticipant 225]

Exactly. I know quite a few girls my age (early 20’s) who have gotten pregnant, had kids, and tricked some unlucky sucker into settling down with them despite being on birth control. “Oops!”. They’re smart enough to realize how much easier it is to be a housewife than to participate in the labor force. The funny thing is these are usually the same whores that preach about feminism and female empowerment! Anything that allows them to continue to live life on “easy mode”.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

The male pill has been blocked for over 30 years.

The last time it was voted down by the European medical council in Prague.

The board of 11 medical experts was 60% women.

Control birth and you control a nation.

[HitmanParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

“every time Maury says “you are not the father”, no woman ever turns to him and says “sorry”.

are they EVER sorry for getting busted ?
good one Key. ..
they are SPERM RAPISTS .
LOWEST OF THE LOW.
the “kids” can’t swim in peace while human vacuumes like that walk about !
eeyeuhhhww.!

[RoyDalParticipant]

WhackerGuy2030 wrote:

Either women are the dumbest species on the planet that they keep getting knocked up on the pill, or it is an invisible rug to be yanked at the time of cashing in.

I’m going with “invisible rug.” If a woman wants to virtually guarantee getting pregnant, all she needs to do is stop taking the pill a day before getting a sperm donation. Interrupting the pill cycle guarantees ovulation. “Hi daddy!”

A condom is a smart move given how women can be carriers of STDs and STIs but symptom-free. About 1/3 of the adult population of the US has a STD or STI, so what are your odds?

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 25]

If a woman says she is on the pill and ‘accidentally’ forgets to take it the guy should have a claim against her for her negligence. Not sure if it’s ever been tried. Would love some guy to do it though.

There was some eastern country where a woman had a lot of plastic surgery. The man didn’t know and sued her for compensation for being hideously ugly as she deceived him and he ended up with a child that was ugly.

Ahh I found the link:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2223718/Chinese-man-sues-wife-ugly-court-AGREES–awarding-120-000.html

China again. It’s starting to look like a fun country to move to.

[Anonymous 3]

Even if a girl is “on the pill” it does not keep you getting STD-s. That’s the reason you can say, why you always wear a condom as a rule. And even if a girl is on the pill and not forgetting to take it and has no STD, some pills need a month or more to really stop unwanted pregnancy. (at least my ex told this long time ago)

I only had sex without condom when i saw that my ex took the pills in front of me, and i have had her for a long time.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

Of course its a hoax, when they get preagnant from chad thunderc~~~ and cant find a blue pill mangina to raise the child they just abort the kid.

The “im on the pill” and “oops i got pregnant” is just a hoax to enslave a blue pill men.

[RockmaninoffParticipant 1641]

Richard Feynman talked about how dishonest science can be, when scientists aren’t up front about how their research might be wrong, what results don’t confirm their theories, etc. Alex Epstein talked about this a bit in The Moral Case for Fossil Fuels too, about how the whole discussion of global warming is a disgrace.

Apropos birth control, everyone knows that there’s a “rate of failure” associated with them, even when used “perfectly.” However, I have yet to see one scientist suggest that that failure rate is due to the “use” being not so “perfect” as was assumed.

Besides, it’s not like the scientists themselves, when studying birth control, actually observe how they’re being used, right? I’m pretty sure that they just ask “how often do you take it” and then take the answer at face value.

Seems like a scientific dereliction of duty.

". . . elle, suivant l’usage des femmes et des chats qui ne viennent pas quand on les appelle et qui viennent quand on ne les appelle pas, s’arrêta devant moi et m’adressa la parole"—Prosper Mérimée

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10910]

Get a vasectomy and tell no one about it. If you’re going to have sex without a condom, it won’t prevent you from getting STD’s but it will give you piece of mind.
Women are on the prowl 24/7 for a man who will have unprotected sex with them. The benefits for them are many. They can already be pregnant and trick you into thinking it’s yours or lie about getting pregnant from you in order to s~~~ test you, control you, etc.
The look on their faces (from what I hear) can be priceless when you tell them you were fixed after they try to drop a pregnancy bomb onto you. They seem to get really p~~~ed when they realize the player got played.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

It shows just how f~~~ed up our society is that women have the vast vast majority of birth control options while being the least trustworthy to use them responsibly.

Why so untrustworthy? Because women have everything to gain from and no responsibility whatsoever for a pregnancy. While men have all the responsibility and no say whatsoever. And yet women still persist in their line of bulls~~~ that pregnancy is somehow an unfair burden on them.

Make women solely responsible for the full cost of raising their children and suddenly you’ll see them being a lot more careful about taking their pill every single day. I guarantee it.

[hellraiderParticipant 2837]

Yup, sidecar, thats my opinion as well.

Cut the umbilical cord to single mothers.
The goverment doesnt have to spend money on the offspring of this retarded c~~~s.

In fact, stop giving money away to women and childcare.

If this dumb c~~~s want to f~~~ thugs and chad thunderc~~~s let them.

But dont waste my tax money suporting them and their litter.

[OracleSummonParticipant 179]

Birth Control should not be paid for by our tax dollars. I get nothing for having my money taken away just so it can be used up for women’s promiscuous desires and decisions.

Luckily, I have vowed a life of celibacy so the chances of me getting involved with someone is extremely low to non-existant. I will also stick to my guns to ensure that the celibate line is never crossed.

[the roadParticipant 3125]

Someone mentioned the ring. Never rely on the ring for birth control!!!! That’s how my son came around. When I found out that my ex was pregnant, the bitch said “it must have fallen out”…. WTF?!!

She wasn’t a loose prostitute either. I kept on banging her because she was ultra tight. Pretty sure she took it out in an attempt to keep me. I’m sure she could tell that I was about to leave her, because that is exactly what I was planning on doing.

I still left her but I told her that I will be around for my child- which I am and I am far more involved with him btw.

I was called a coward and a chicken s~~~. Whatever, I didn’t love her and there was no way I was going to fake it. Shouldn’t have gotten pregnant beeotch. Now we have a lifetime of two households to deal with.

#MANOUT

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

OracleSummon wrote:

Birth Control should not be paid for by our tax dollars.

Birth control is MUCH cheaper than 18+ years of welfare and entitlements. And then the next generation of welfare and entitlements. And then the next. Rinse. Repeat.

So I have no problem with tax dollars going to birth control if it’s part of a deal where the welfare gravy train gets irrevocably cut off.

Luckily, I have vowed a life of celibacy so the chances of me getting involved with someone is extremely low to non-existant. I will also stick to my guns to ensure that the celibate line is never crossed.

Oh but you are involved, whether you want to be or not. Every April 15th you get to pay so selfish irresponsible women can exercise their right to do what they want with their bodies by having children they cannot afford to feed. So you are forced to feed them.

the road wrote:

Never rely on the ring for birth control!!!!

Never rely on a woman for birth control.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

Anonymous wrote:

I only had sex without condom when i saw that my ex took the pills in front of me, and i have had her for a long time.

Bad move man…if she didn’t take it for a couple days when you weren’t around then was a good girl and took it in front of you the night she f~~~ed you, she could have got pregnant. If they miss a pill in the series it could f~~~ up that whole cycle…its not like they pop a pill and are anti-preggo for the next 24 hours.

[OracleSummonParticipant 179]

sidecar wrote:

OracleSummon wrote:

Birth Control should not be paid for by our tax dollars.

Birth control is MUCH cheaper than 18+ years of welfare and entitlements. And then the next generation of welfare and entitlements. And then the next. Rinse. Repeat.

So I have no problem with tax dollars going to birth control if it’s part of a deal where the welfare gravy train gets irrevocably cut off.

We should not be rewarding irresponsible (intentional or not) mothers by paying for their kids. This only encourages the behavior as it provides a safety net.

I figure that paying for birth control pills are the lesser of the two evils, but it still cheats us out of money.

Luckily, I have vowed a life of celibacy so the chances of me getting involved with someone is extremely low to non-existant. I will also stick to my guns to ensure that the celibate line is never crossed.

Oh but you are involved, whether you want to be or not. Every April 15th you get to pay so selfish irresponsible women can exercise their right to do what they want with their bodies by having children they cannot afford to feed. So you are forced to feed them.

I know that my tax dollars are going to feed single mothers and it baffles and enrages me at the same time. They are breeding the next generation of criminals and yet I am expected to pay for it. This gravy train is going to end sooner or later, then we will see the next law that Government cooks to get men to surrender more money.

[WhackerGuy2030Participant 999]

What’s amazing, is that the best earning year I ever had, I paid $31,000 in taxes. It earned me the prestigious “top 10%” of wage earners status according to the IRS. What was also a giant let down, is that my contribution as a top 10%’er was completely consumed by one land whale on the take. How the country can survive that is beyond me.

Fast forward, I’ve successfully built my investment and retirement base. I’m not retired yet, but I’ve got enough set aside that if I can just hold her steady from here, I should retire quite comfortably 20 years from now. I outperformed my age 33 savings goal by about 4 times what I was planning to have to have to compound my way to a posh retirement.

The next phase is to take my 401k from my previous job, and get all the taxes paid on it now by converting it to a Roth IRA. I’ve used two tax years to do that, and will likely have it done in another one or two. I’ve paid quite a bit in tax to do it, but for the time being, i’m in the lowest bracket I’ll be in ever again and I’m using it while the window is open. In the event I move back to my home state (the land of 10,000 taxes) I won’t be carrying a huge deferred tax bill with me.

[Author]

Posts